Dabigatran: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 51: Line 51:


==FDA Review of Atrial Fibrillation Data From RELY on September 20th, 2010==
==FDA Review of Atrial Fibrillation Data From RELY on September 20th, 2010==
RELY was a non-inferiority trial. Primary endpoints was a composite of stroke and systemic embolism. RELY patients included those patients with non-valvular [[atrial fibrillation]]. Both patients who were [[coumadin]] naive and non naive were enrolled. Both doses of dabigatran were inferior with a hazard ratio margin of 1.38. The 150 mg dose of dabigatran was superior in the prevention of the primary endpoint.   
RELY was a non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke and systemic embolism. RELY patients included those patients with non-valvular [[atrial fibrillation]]. Both patients who were [[coumadin]] naive and non naive were enrolled. Both doses of dabigatran were inferior with a hazard ratio margin of 1.38. The 150 mg dose of dabigatran was superior in the prevention of the primary endpoint.   
There was an increased risk of clinically manifest MI associated with Dabigatran dosing. There was no increased risk of revascularization. There was no data available regarding study drug discontinuation in the day or days before an MI to link rebound to an increased risk of MI.  There was numerically a higher risk of major bleeds the week before an MI in the dabigatran group, although this number did not reach statistical significance.
There was an increased risk of clinically manifest MI associated with Dabigatran dosing. There was no increased risk of revascularization. There was no data available regarding study drug discontinuation in the day or days before an MI to link rebound to an increased risk of MI.  There was numerically a higher risk of major bleeds the week before an MI in the dabigatran group, although this number did not reach statistical significance.
While [[dyspepsia]] was increased, this was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding.
While [[dyspepsia]] was increased, this was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding.
Patients who dropped out could be followed up by telephone contact. Being seen in clinic may yield different ascertainment of endpoints than when being followed up by phone. Similar rates to being followed up by phone (8%) and being seen in clinic. 96% of subjects completed the trial. 19% of dabigatran patients and 15% of coumadin patients discontinued therapy. Number of events need to reverse non inf finding, would need 40 events.  Non inf of 15o dose appears to be robust.
Efficacy of warfarin, was it given the right way. When you look at other RCTs, historical rates for placebo were higher than RELY for placebo. Warfarin rate similar to RCTs.
===Time in Therapeutic Range===
Time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 64% is not too dissimilar to other RCTs. TTR in RELY is similar to that in SPORTIF III and V. Rate may depend upon frequency of TTR monitoring.  High TTR may reflect a low frequency of INR monitoring.
===Quality of Data and Adjudciation===
===Quality of Data and Adjudciation===
The rate of concordance between investigator and CEC reported events was 50% to 85%.
The rate of concordance between investigator and CEC reported events was 50% to 85%.

Revision as of 14:39, 20 September 2010

{{drugbox | | IUPAC_name = Ethyl 3-{[(2-{[(4-{N'-[(hexyloxy)carbonyl] carbamimidoyl}phenyl)amino]methyl}-1-methyl-1H- benzimidazol-5-yl)carbonyl] (2-pyridinyl)amino}propanoate | image = Dabigatran etexilate.png | width = 135px | CAS_number = 211915-06-9 | CAS_supplemental = 211914-51-1 | ATC_prefix = | ATC_suffix = | ATC_supplemental= | PubChem = 6445226 | DrugBank = | chemical_formula = | C=34 | H=41 | N=7 | I= | Br= | Cl= | F= | O=5 | P= | S= | Se= | Na= | charge= | molecular_weight = 627.734 (471.511 without etexilate) | specific_rotation = | sec_combustion = | bioavailability = | protein_bound = | metabolism = | elimination_half-life = | excretion = | pregnancy_AU = | pregnancy_US = | pregnancy_category = | legal_AU = | legal_UK = | legal_US = | legal_status = | dependency_liability = unknown | routes_of_administration = oral }} Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

WikiDoc Resources for Dabigatran

Articles

Most recent articles on Dabigatran

Most cited articles on Dabigatran

Review articles on Dabigatran

Articles on Dabigatran in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Dabigatran

Images of Dabigatran

Photos of Dabigatran

Podcasts & MP3s on Dabigatran

Videos on Dabigatran

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Dabigatran

Bandolier on Dabigatran

TRIP on Dabigatran

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Dabigatran at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Dabigatran

Clinical Trials on Dabigatran at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Dabigatran

NICE Guidance on Dabigatran

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Dabigatran

CDC on Dabigatran

Books

Books on Dabigatran

News

Dabigatran in the news

Be alerted to news on Dabigatran

News trends on Dabigatran

Commentary

Blogs on Dabigatran

Definitions

Definitions of Dabigatran

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Dabigatran

Discussion groups on Dabigatran

Patient Handouts on Dabigatran

Directions to Hospitals Treating Dabigatran

Risk calculators and risk factors for Dabigatran

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Dabigatran

Causes & Risk Factors for Dabigatran

Diagnostic studies for Dabigatran

Treatment of Dabigatran

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Dabigatran

International

Dabigatran en Espanol

Dabigatran en Francais

Business

Dabigatran in the Marketplace

Patents on Dabigatran

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Dabigatran

Please Join in Editing This Page and Apply to be an Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Overview

Dabigatran is an anticoagulant from the class of the direct thrombin inhibitors. It is being studied for various clinical indications, for some of which it may replace warfarin as the preferred anticoagulant. It is orally administered as the prodrug dabigatran etexilate (planned trade names Rendix and Pradaxa). It was developed by pharmaceutical company Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Development

Dabigatran (then compound BIBR 953) was discovered from a panel of chemicals with similar structure to benzamidine-based thrombin inhibitor α-NAPAP (N-alpha-(2-naphthylsulfonylglycyl)-4-amidinophenylalanine piperidide), which had been known since the 1980s as a powerful inhibitor of various serine proteases, specifically thrombin but also trypsin. Addition of a hydrophobic side chain led to the orally absorbed prodrug BIBR 1048 (dabigatran etexilate).[1]
Phase 3 clinical trials are ongoing in treatment and prevention of secondary venous thromboembolism (VTE) in post-operative orthopedic patients (expected results by Oct 2007); long-term prophylaxis in acute coronary syndrome and stroke patients and symptomatic VTE because of various causes (expected results by 2009-2010).[2]

Dosing

Unlike coumadin, there is no monitoring required (an INR is not required).

A 2004 study showed a good safety profile at doses between 12.5 and 300 mg twice daily.[3]

In a phase II study comparing dabigatran with enoxaparin showed increased efficacy in preventing thrombosis in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, but a possible increased bleeding risk in patients receiving higher doses of dabigatran.[4]

Absorption is unrelated to food but may be decreased with co-administration of proton pump inhibitors.[5]

FDA Review of Atrial Fibrillation Data From RELY on September 20th, 2010

RELY was a non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke and systemic embolism. RELY patients included those patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Both patients who were coumadin naive and non naive were enrolled. Both doses of dabigatran were inferior with a hazard ratio margin of 1.38. The 150 mg dose of dabigatran was superior in the prevention of the primary endpoint. There was an increased risk of clinically manifest MI associated with Dabigatran dosing. There was no increased risk of revascularization. There was no data available regarding study drug discontinuation in the day or days before an MI to link rebound to an increased risk of MI. There was numerically a higher risk of major bleeds the week before an MI in the dabigatran group, although this number did not reach statistical significance. While dyspepsia was increased, this was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Patients who dropped out could be followed up by telephone contact. Being seen in clinic may yield different ascertainment of endpoints than when being followed up by phone. Similar rates to being followed up by phone (8%) and being seen in clinic. 96% of subjects completed the trial. 19% of dabigatran patients and 15% of coumadin patients discontinued therapy. Number of events need to reverse non inf finding, would need 40 events. Non inf of 15o dose appears to be robust. Efficacy of warfarin, was it given the right way. When you look at other RCTs, historical rates for placebo were higher than RELY for placebo. Warfarin rate similar to RCTs.

Time in Therapeutic Range

Time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 64% is not too dissimilar to other RCTs. TTR in RELY is similar to that in SPORTIF III and V. Rate may depend upon frequency of TTR monitoring. High TTR may reflect a low frequency of INR monitoring.

Quality of Data and Adjudciation

The rate of concordance between investigator and CEC reported events was 50% to 85%.

References

  1. Hauel NH, Nar H, Priepke H, Ries U, Stassen JM, Wienen W. Structure-based design of novel potent nonpeptide thrombin inhibitors. J Med Chem 2002;45:1757-66. PMID 11960487.
  2. Currently active clinical trials of Dabigatran at ClinicalTrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/search?term=Dabigatran&submit=Search
  3. Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Ahnfelt L, Kalebo P, Stangier J, Nehmiz G, Hermansson K, Kohlbrenner V. Dose escalating safety study of a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, in patients undergoing total hip replacement: BISTRO I. J Thromb Haemost 2004;2:1573-80. PMID 15333033.
  4. Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Buller HR, Hettiarachchi R, Rosencher N, Bravo ML, Ahnfelt L, Piovella F, Stangier J, Kalebo P, Reilly P; BISTRO II Study Group. A new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, compared with enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip or knee replacement: the BISTRO II randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost 2005;3:103-11. PMID 15634273.
  5. Stangier J, Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Ahnfelt L, Nehmiz G, Stahle H, Rathgen K, Svard R. Pharmacokinetic profile of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in healthy volunteers and patients undergoing total hip replacement. J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:555-63. PMID 15831779.

External links

Template:SIB

Template:WikiDoc Sources