Revision as of 12:14, 20 November 2018 by imported>Citation bot(Add: year, pages, issue, volume, journal, title, pmc, pmid, author pars. 1-3. Formatted dashes. You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Ruslik0)
Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) or gastroinhibitory peptide, also known as the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, is an inhibiting hormone of the secretin family of hormones.[1] While it is weak inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, its main role is to stimulate insulin secretion.[2]
GIP is derived from a 153-amino acid proprotein encoded by the GIP gene and circulates as a biologically active 42-amino acid peptide. It is synthesized by K cells, which are found in the mucosa of the duodenum and the jejunum of the gastrointestinal tract.[4]
It has traditionally been named gastrointestinal inhibitory peptide or gastric inhibitory peptide and was found to decrease the secretion of stomach acid[5] to protect the small intestine from acid damage, reduce the rate at which food is transferred through the stomach, and inhibit the GI motility and secretion of acid. However, this is incorrect, as it was discovered that these effects are achieved only with higher-than-normal physiological level, and that these results naturally occur in the body through a similar hormone, secretin.
It is now believed that the function of GIP is to induce insulin secretion, which is stimulated primarily by hyperosmolarity of glucose in the duodenum.[6] After this discovery, some researchers prefer the new name of glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, while retaining the acronym "GIP." The amount of insulin secreted is greater when glucose is administered orally than intravenously.[7]
In addition to its role as an incretin GIP is known to inhibit apoptosis of the pancreatic beta cells and to promote their proliferation. It also stimulates glucagon secretion and fat accumulation. GIP receptors are expressed in many organs and tissues including the central nervous system enabling GIP to influence hippocampal memory formation and regulation of appetite and satiety.[8]
GIP recently appeared as a major player in bone remodeling. Researchers at Universities of Angers and Ulster evidenced that genetic ablation of the GIP receptor in mice resulted in profound alterations of bone microarchitecture through modification of the adipokine network.[9] Furthermore, the deficiency in GIP receptors has also been associated in mice with a dramatic decrease in bone quality and a subsequent increase in fracture risk.[10] However, the results obtained by these groups are far from conclusive because their animal models give discordant answers and these works should be analysed very carefully.
Pathology
It has been found that Type 2 diabetics are not responsive to GIP and have lower levels of GIP secretion after a meal when compared to non-diabetics.[11] In research involving knockout mice, it was found that absence of the GIP receptors correlates with resistance to obesity.[12]
References
↑Meier JJ, Nauck MA (2005). "Glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP-1) in biology and pathology". Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews. 21 (2): 91–117. doi:10.1002/dmrr.538. PMID15759282.
↑Thorens B (Dec 1995). "Glucagon-like peptide-1 and control of insulin secretion". Diabète & Métabolisme. 21 (5): 311–8. PMID8586147.
↑Boron WF, Boulpaep EL (2009). Medical physiology: a cellular and molecular approach (2nd International ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier. ISBN9781416031154.
↑Mieczkowska A, Irwin N, Flatt PR, Chappard D, Mabilleau G (Oct 2013). "Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor deletion leads to reduced bone strength and quality". Bone. 56 (2): 337–42. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.003. PMID23851294.
↑Skrha J, Hilgertová J, Jarolímková M, Kunešová M, Hill M (2010). "Meal test for glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) in obese and type 2 diabetic patients". Physiological Research. 59 (5): 749–55. PMID20406045.
↑Yamada Y, Seino Y (2004). "Physiology of GIP--a lesson from GIP receptor knockout mice". Hormone and Metabolic Research. 36 (11–12): 771–4. doi:10.1055/s-2004-826162. PMID15655707.