Reperfusion injury natural history

Revision as of 23:13, 20 August 2020 by Sara Mohsin (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 1654017 by Sara Mohsin (talk))
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivam Singla, M.D.[2] Anjan K. Chakrabarti, M.D. [3] Kashish Goel, M.D.

Overview

Natural History

Reperfusion Injury Natural History

The Ischemia-reperfusion injury was first seen in 1955 by Sewell while performing ligation of Dog's coronary arteries

Then later Jennings gave the term Myocardial IRI in 1960. He is the first person to name the term Ischemia Reperfusion Injury(IRI) on the basis of histological changes in canine myocardium.

Later various terms were given by the scientist depending upon the various organ system involved:

  • Then Modry gave the term Lung IRI in 1978

Ischemic preconditioning was first explained by Murry et al. In 1986 he performed a study in dog explaining the importance of ischemia reperfusion in dogs on infarct size reduction.

Ischemic post-conditioning was given by Zhao et al in 2003 and explained this with the help of an experiment showing a small episode of Ischemia or reperfusion performed immediately after the resumption of flow following a period of ischemia. They found that this helped in the reduction of infarct size in dogs by up to 40%

Natural History of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

Complications

Complications of IRI

Myocardial stunning: It is mainly defined as an abnormality in the contractile function of myocardium that sometimes persists even after the return of reperfusion and resolution of ischemia. It is mainly due to the release of reactive oxygen species and intracellular calcium overload.

Prognosis

Prognosis in CNS patients

References