Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tricuspid Regurgitation Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Tricuspid Regurgitation from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Stages

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Echocardiography

Cardiac CT

Cardiac MRI

Chest X Ray

Electrocardiogram

Cardiac Stress Test

Cardiac Catheterization

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA onTricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT

CDC on Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT

Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT in the news

Blogs on Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT

Directions to Hospitals Treating Tricuspid regurgitation

Risk calculators and risk factors for Tricuspid regurgitation cardiac CT

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Basir Gill, M.B.B.S, M.D.[2]

Overview

While echocardiography serves as the baseline for diagnosing tricuspid regurgitation (TR), cardiac computed tomography (CT) has become a mandatory adjunct for detailed anatomical mapping and planning transcatheter interventions.[1][2] Its primary advantage lies in its high spatial resolution and 3D imaging capabilities, which provide clarity in patients where poor acoustic windows limit the utility of ultrasound.[1][2]

Anatomical Assessment and TR Morphology

  • Leaflet Configuration: CT is used to identify specific leaflet variations (Types I–IV), which is a vital step in understanding the underlying mechanism of the regurgitation.[3]
  • Annular Measurement: CT is considered the gold standard for calculating the 3D dimensions of the tricuspid annulus, including its perimeter, area, and specific diameters.[2][4]
  • Right-Sided Remodeling: By providing precise measurements of right ventricular (RV) volume and right atrial (RA) size, CT helps clinicians distinguish between "atrial secondary TR" (driven by atrial enlargement) and "ventricular secondary TR" (driven by RV remodeling).[5][2]

Pre-procedural planning for Transcatheter Interventions

For patients being considered for transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) or repair, cardiac CT is a prerequisite for procedural success:[2][6]

  • Peripheral and Central Access: CT scans are used to check the caliber and path of the iliac and femoral veins, as well as the alignment of the inferior vena cava (IVC), to plan the device delivery route.[2]
  • Right Coronary Artery (RCA) Mapping: Because the RCA runs in close proximity to the tricuspid annulus, CT is used to visualize its course to prevent accidental compression or injury during annuloplasty or valve replacement.[2]
  • Evaluation of CIED Leads: In patients with existing pacemakers or defibrillators, CT determines if a lead is a "bystander" or if it is physically impinging on a leaflet, which helps predict the risk of lead entrapment during the procedure.[7][6]
  • Optimizing Fluoroscopy: CT modeling allows the heart team to pre-calculate the best "coplanar" angles for fluoroscopy, ensuring optimal visualization of the annular plane during the operation.[2]

Quantitative Assessment of TR Severity

CT is increasingly used to support the grading of TR when other imaging results are ambiguous:

  • Anatomic Regurgitant Orifice Area (AROA): High-definition CT can measure the physical systolic gap between leaflets, providing an AROA value that correlates with the severity of the leak.[2]
  • Venous Contrast Reflux: The observation of contrast dye flowing backward into the hepatic veins and IVC during a scan serves as a strong qualitative indicator of advanced TR.[2]

Technical Considerations

  • Contrast Protocols: To avoid artifacts in the right atrium that could mask the thin valve leaflets, specialized "split-bolus" or "chaser" contrast injection methods are required.[2]
  • ECG Gating: The scan must be synced with an ECG to allow for multi-phase visualization, ensuring the valve is captured during mid-systole when the regurgitant volume is typically at its peak.[2]
Comparison of CT with Other Modalities[8]
Feature Echocardiography (TTE/TEE) Cardiac CT
Primary Strength Real-time hemodynamics and flow Superior spatial resolution and anatomy
Annular Sizing Less precise due to 2D/3D limitations Preferred standard for 3D measurements
RCA Proximity Often difficult to visualize Excellent for mapping coronary paths
Limitations Dependent on acoustic windows Involves radiation and contrast agents

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Praz, F., Borger, M. A., Lanz, J., Marin-Cuartas, M., Abreu, A., Adamo, M., Ajmone Marsan, N., Barili, F., Bonaros, N., Cosyns, B., De Paulis, R., Gamra, H., Jahangiri, M., Jeppsson, A., Klautz, R. J. M., Mores, B., Pérez-David, E., Pöss, J., Prendergast, B. D., … Moorjani, N. (2025). 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: Developed by the task force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal, 46(44), 4635–4736. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf194
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 Hahn, R. T., Saric, M., Faletra, F. F., Garg, R., Gillam, L. D., Horton, K., Khalique, O. K., Little, S. H., Mackensen, G. B., Oh, J., Quader, N., Safi, L., Scalia, G. M., & Lang, R. M. (2022). Recommended standards for the performance of transesophageal echocardiographic screening for structural heart intervention: From the American society of echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: Official Publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 35(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2021.07.006
  3. Hahn, R. T., Weckbach, L. T., Noack, T., Hamid, N., Kitamura, M., Bae, R., Lurz, P., Kodali, S. K., Sorajja, P., Hausleiter, J., & Nabauer, M. (2021). Proposal for a standard echocardiographic tricuspid valve nomenclature. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging, 14(7), 1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.01.012
  4. Schulz-Menger, J., Bluemke, D. A., Bremerich, J., Flamm, S. D., Fogel, M. A., Friedrich, M. G., Kim, R. J., von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F., Kramer, C. M., Pennell, D. J., Plein, S., & Nagel, E. (2020). Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Official Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 22(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6
  5. Hahn, R. T., Lawlor MD MS, M., Davidson, C. J., Badhwar, V., Sannino, A., Spitzer, E., Lurz, P., Lindman MD MSCI, B., Topilsky, Y., Baron MD MSc, S., Chadderdon, S., Khalique, O. K., Gilbert H.L. Tang, MD, MSc, MBA, Taramasso, M., Grayburn, P. A., Badano, L., Leipsic, J., Lindenfeld, J., Windecker, S., … Hausleiter, J. (2023). Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium Definitions for Tricuspid Regurgitation and Trial Endpoints. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.008
  6. 6.0 6.1 Hahn, R. T., Makkar, R., Makar, M., Davidson, C., Puthamana, J., Zahr, F., Chadderdon, S., Fam, N., Ong, G., Yadav, P. K., Thourani, V. H., Vannan, M. A., Tchétché, D., Dumonteil, N., Bonfils, L., Lepage, L., Smith, R., Grayburn, P. A., Webb, J. G., … Kodali, S. (2024). EVOQUE tricuspid valve replacement system: State-of-the-art screening and intraprocedural guidance. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions, 17(18), 2093–2112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.07.034
  7. Andreas, M., Burri, H., Praz, F., Soliman, O., Badano, L., Barreiro, M., Cavalcante, J. L., de Potter, T., Doenst, T., Friedrichs, K., Hausleiter, J., Karam, N., Kodali, S., Latib, A., Marijon, E., Mittal, S., Nickenig, G., Rinaldi, A., Rudzinski, P. N., … Leclercq, C. (2024). Tricuspid valve disease and cardiac implantable electronic devices. European Heart Journal, 45(5), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad783
  8. Salter, B., Tang, G. H. L., Hahn, R. T., Lala, A., Adams, D. H., Asgar, A., Borger, M. A., Fam, N. P., Ho, E. C., Khera, S., Kini, A. S., Latib, A., Lee, A. P. W., Lerakis, S., Lurz, P., Safi, L. M., Sorajja, P., Stephan von Bardeleben, R., Praz, F., … So, K. C. Y. (2026). A contemporary look at the landscape of treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: A review: A review. JAMA Cardiology, 11(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2025.4337


Template:WikiDoc Sources CME Category::Cardiology