Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics

Jump to navigation Jump to search


Resident
Survival
Guide

Mitral Regurgitation Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Mitral Regurgitation from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Stages

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Chest X Ray

Electrocardiogram

Echocardiography

Cardiac MRI

Cardiac Catheterization

Treatment

Overview

Acute Mitral Regurgitation Treatment

Chronic Mitral Regurgitation Treatment

Surgery

Follow Up

Case Studies

Case #1

Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA onMitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics

CDC on Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics

Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics in the news

Blogs on Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics

Directions to Hospitals Treating Mitral regurgitation

Risk calculators and risk factors for Mitral regurgitation epidemiology and demographics

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S., Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan, M.B.B.S., Rim Halaby, M.D. [2] Khizer Yaseen, M.B.B.S.[3]

Overview

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular regurgitation abnormality and the most common valvular heart disease in the United States[1], with degenerative mitral regurgitation being the most frequent cause of primary MR in developed countries[2]. The prevalence of MR of a severity equal to or more than mild was reported in The Framingham Heart Study as 19.0% in men and 19.1% in women. The prevalence of MR increases with age.

Prevalence

  • The Framingham Heart Study, a prospective epidemiologic study, evaluated the prevalence and severity of MR and other valvular diseases by color Doppler examinations in 1,696 men and 1,893 women.
  • Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular regurgitation in the general population, followed by tricuspid regurgitation and aortic regurgitation, and constitutes a major proportion of the burden of valvular heart disease in population-based studies[3].
  • Degenerative mitral regurgitation is particularly prevalent in developed countries and represents the most common etiology of primary MR in Western populations[2].
  • The prevalence of MR (with a severity ranging from trace to ≥ moderate regurgitation) was 87.7% in men and 91.5% in women.
  • When trace regurgitation is excluded, the prevalence of MR of a severity ≥ mild was 19.0% in men and 19.1% in women.
  • The elevated prevalence of trace regurgitation can be a normal finding related to an artifact or an anatomic characteristic of the closure of the mitral valve.[4][5]

Age

  • The prevalence of MR increases with age. MR is one of the most common valvular heart disease in the elderly.
  • Shown below are tables depicting the prevalence of MR by age and severity in men and women according the results of the Framingham Heart Study.[4]
  • Clinical outcomes in mitral regurgitation are influenced by age, with older age identified as an important determinant of mortality and disease progression[6]
Severity of MR Prevalence of MR by age in men
26-29 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-83
No MR (%) 14.4 13.3 11.3 12.7 9.0
Trace (%) 76.7 72.9 74.6 60.3 51.7
Mild (%) 8.9 13.5 12.5 24.6 28.1
Moderate or severe (%) 0 0.3 1.6 2.4 11.2


Severity of MR Prevalence of MR by age in women
26-29 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-83
No MR (%) 14.0 8.6 9.0 7.2 5.6
Trace (%) 76.3 75 74 66.5 70.8
Mild (%) 9.7 15.5 16 24 23.6
Moderate or severe (%) 0 0.9 1 2.3 0

Gender[7]

Sex differences have been observed in the structural remodeling associated with primary mitral regurgitation, with females generally demonstrating smaller left ventricular dimensions for the same degree of regurgitation severity[7][8]. Additionally, women may be referred for surgical intervention less frequently and at later stages of disease compared with men[7].

Prognosis

Without appropriate intervention, severe primary mitral regurgitation carries an adverse prognosis, with more than 90% of untreated patients developing heart failure or death within 10 years[9]

Demographic Factors

Several demographic and clinical factors influence outcomes in primary mitral regurgitation. Older age, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end-systolic dimension, left atrial enlargement, pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, and atrial arrhythmias have been associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased mortality[6].

References

  1. Rosenhek R, Rader F, Klaar U, Gabriel H, Krejc M, Kalbeck D, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2006 May 9;113(18):2238-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.599175. Epub 2006 May 1. PMID: 16651470.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Enriquez-Sarano M, Akins CW, Vahanian A. Mitral regurgitation. Lancet. 2009 Apr 18;373(9672):1382-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60692-9. Epub 2009 Apr 6. PMID: 19356795.
  3. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006 Sep 16;368(9540):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8. PMID: 16980116.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D, Larson MG, Freed LA, Fuller DL; et al. (1999). "Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study)". Am J Cardiol. 83 (6): 897–902. PMID 10190406.
  5. Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D, Larson MG, Freed LA, Fuller DL; et al. (1999). "Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study)". Am J Cardiol. 83 (6): 897–902. PMID 10190406.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Gaasch WH, Meyer TE. Left ventricular response to mitral regurgitation: implications for management. Circulation. 2008 Nov 25;118(22):2298-303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.755942. PMID: 19029478.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Avierinos JF, Inamo J, Grigioni F, Gersh B, Shub C, Enriquez-Sarano M. Sex differences in morphology and outcomes of mitral valve prolapse. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 2;149(11):787-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-11-200812020-00003. PMID: 19047025; PMCID: PMC2897166.
  8. Abadie BQ, Cremer PC, Vakamudi S, Gillinov AM, Svensson LG, Cho L. Sex-Specific Prognosis of Left Ventricular Size and Function Following Repair of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 16;83(2):303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.033. PMID: 38199708.
  9. Watt TMF, Brescia AA, Murray SL, Burn DA, Wisniewski A, Romano MA, Bolling SF; Michigan Mitral Research Group (MMRG). Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair Restores Life Expectancy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Aug 28. PMID: 31472142; PMCID: PMC7377922.

Template:WH Template:WS