Endometriosis secondary prevention

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Endometriosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Endometriosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Endometriosis secondary prevention On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Endometriosis secondary prevention

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Endometriosis secondary prevention

CDC on Endometriosis secondary prevention

Endometriosis secondary prevention in the news

Blogs on Endometriosis secondary prevention

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type chapter name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Endometriosis secondary prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2], Aravind Kuchkuntla, M.B.B.S[3]

Overview

There are no established strategies to prevent progression of endometriosis prior to diagnosis.  

However, certain interventions may reduce recurrence, persistent pain, and long-term complications following diagnosis or surgical treatment.[1][2][3]

Secondary Prevention

Postoperative hormonal suppression is associated with reduced recurrence of endometriosis.  

In a meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials and 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 1766), postoperative hormonal suppression reduced recurrence (10.7% vs 26.4%; RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.65).[3]

A separate meta-analysis demonstrated lower pain scores with postoperative suppression compared with no treatment (standard mean difference −0.49; 95% CI −0.91 to −0.07).[3]

Endometriosis is a chronic condition, and long-term suppressive hormonal therapy may be required to reduce symptom recurrence..[1][2]

Repeated surgical interventions should be avoided when possible due to limited high-quality evidence demonstrating long-term benefit.[4]

When hysterectomy is performed for endometriosis-associated pain, ovarian conservation is generally preferred in patients without genetic ovarian cancer risk to reduce long-term complications associated with surgical menopause.[5][6]

Guideline-supported presumed diagnosis based on symptoms and imaging may reduce unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.[7][8][9]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Coxon L, Demetriou L, Vincent K. Current developments in endometriosis-associated pain. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5(10):101769. doi:10.1016/j. xcrm.2024.101769
  2. 2.0 2.1 Kaplan CM, Kelleher E, Irani A, Schrepf A, Clauw DJ, Harte SE. Deciphering nociplastic pain: clinical features, risk factors and potential mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. 2024;20(6):347-363. doi:10.1038/s41582-024-00966-8
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Zakhari A, Delpero E, McKeown S, Tomlinson G, Bougie O, Murji A. Endometriosis recurrence following post-operative hormonal suppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(1):96-107. doi:10.1093/humupd/ dmaa033
  4. Fang QY, Campbell N, Mooney SS, Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Tyson K. Evidence for the role of multidisciplinary team care in people with pelvic pain and endometriosis: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;64(3):181-192. doi:10.1111/ajo.13755
  5. Kvaskoff M, Horne AW, Missmer SA. Informing women with endometriosis about ovarian cancer risk. Lancet. 2017;390(10111):2433-2434. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33049-0
  6. Stewart EA, Missmer SA, RoccaWA.Moving beyond reflexive and prophylactic gynecologic surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(2):291-294. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.012
  7. Singh SS, Allaire C, Al-Nourhji O, et al. Guideline No. 449: diagnosis and impact of endometriosis—a canadian guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024; 46(5):102450. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102450
  8. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Australian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2021. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://ranzcog.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/+2022/02/Endometriosis-clinical-practice-guideline.+pdf
  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Management: NICE Guideline 37. Published September 6, 2017. Updated April 16, 2024. Accessed January 13, 2025. https://www.nice.org.+uk/guidance/ng73/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-+4550371315