Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Endometriosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Endometriosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy

CDC on Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy

Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy in the news

Blogs on Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type chapter name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Endometriosis cost-effectiveness of therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]

Overview

Formal cost-effectiveness analyses of endometriosis therapies are limited.  

However, evidence-based management strategies may reduce recurrence, repeat surgery, and long-term morbidity, which may have indirect economic implications.[1][2][3]

Cost-Effective Considerations

  • Cost-effectiveness analyses specific to endometriosis therapies are not well established.  
  • Guideline-supported presumed diagnosis based on symptoms and imaging may reduce unnecessary diagnostic laparoscopy and associated healthcare utilization.[4][5]
  • Postoperative hormonal suppression reduces recurrence (10.7% vs 26.4%; RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26–0.65), which may decrease need for repeat surgical intervention.[2]
  • Repeated surgical procedures should be avoided when possible due to limited evidence of long-term benefit and associated morbidity.[3]
  • Ovarian conservation during hysterectomy, when appropriate, may reduce long-term cardiovascular, metabolic, and mental health risks associated with surgical menopause.[6][7][8]

References

  1. Singh SS, Allaire C, Al-Nourhji O, et al. Guideline No. 449: diagnosis and impact of endometriosis—a canadian guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024; 46(5):102450. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102450
  2. 2.0 2.1 Zakhari A, Delpero E, McKeown S, Tomlinson G, Bougie O, Murji A. Endometriosis recurrence following post-operative hormonal suppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(1):96-107. doi:10.1093/humupd/ dmaa033
  3. 3.0 3.1 Fang QY, Campbell N, Mooney SS, Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Tyson K. Evidence for the role of multidisciplinary team care in people with pelvic pain and endometriosis: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;64(3):181-192. doi:10.1111/ajo.13755
  4. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Australian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2021. Accessed February 10, 2025. https://ranzcog.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/+2022/02/Endometriosis-clinical-practice-guideline.+pdf
  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Management: NICE Guideline 37. Published September 6, 2017. Updated April 16, 2024. Accessed January 13, 2025. https://www.nice.org.+uk/guidance/ng73/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-+4550371315
  6. Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Aragam K, et al. Association of premature natural and surgical menopause with incident cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2019;322(24):2411-2421. doi:10.1001/jama. 2019.19191
  7. Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Khan Z,Weaver AL, Smith CY, RoccaWA, Stewart EA. Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study. Menopause. 2018;25(5):483-492. doi:10.1097/GME. 0000000000001043
  8. Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Satish A, Khan Z, Smith CY, RoccaWA, Stewart EA. Long-term risk of de novo mental health conditions after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study. Menopause. 2020;27(1):33-42. doi:10.1097/GME. 0000000000001415