Cholangitis

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cholangitis
Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.
(Image courtesy of RadsWiki)
ICD-10 K83.0
ICD-9 576.1
DiseasesDB 2514
eMedicine med/2665  emerg/96
MeSH D002761

Cholangitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cholangitis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Cholangitis On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cholangitis

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cholangitis

CDC on Cholangitis

Cholangitis in the news

Blogs on Cholangitis

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cholangitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cholangitis

For patient information click here

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology & Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Causes

Differentiating Cholangitis

Complications & Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Staging | Laboratory tests | Electrocardiogram | X Rays | CT | MRI Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other images | Alternative diagnostics

Treatment

Medical therapy | Surgical options | Primary prevention | Secondary prevention | Financial costs | Future therapies

Pathophysiology

The presence of gallstones alone predisposes to bacterial colonization. 70% of patients with gallstones will have bacteria in the bile while normal bile is usually sterile. CBD have a higher probability of infection. 80% of stones can be culture positive.

The source of biliary infection is usually ascending from the duodenum or jejunum and less commonly direct hematogenous seeding of the portal system. In the presence of obstruction, the small bowel becomes colonized with colonic flora. The common organisms are E.coli, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Enterobacter, Proteus. Anaerobes (Strep, Bacteroides, Clostridia) can be found particularly in the elderly. Higher incidence of Pseudomonas in those who have been instrumented. Broad spectrum antibiotics to cover Gram negatives including Pseudomonas, Enterococcus and anaerobes are needed up front. Cephalosporins should not be used as monotherapy. Cipro has been shown in one study to be as effective as monotherapy despite poor coverage for anaerobes and EC.

The most common causes of biliary obstruction are biliary calculi, benign stricture or malignant neoplasms. Benign strictures are caused by primary sclerosing cholangitis, ischemic cholangitis, iatrogenic biliary tract injury, congenital disease and infection. Chronic inflammation predisposed to the development of cholangiocarcinoma. Extraluminal obstruction can occur from pancreatic cancer or pseudocyst, lymphoma, hepatoma, metastatic disease or ampullary cancer.

Biliary obstruction leads to elevated biliary pressures, favoring migration of bacteria into the portal circulation and bile. As pressures increase hepatocyte secretion is impaired and bacteria move into the lymphatics and systemic circulation.

Diagnosis

50-60% of patients will have all three of Charcot’s triad. 95% will have fever, 66% abdominal pain, jaundice is noted in 80% (When bilirubin >2.5). Nonobstructive stones are more likely to present without pain or fever. Elderly patients may present only with hypotension. Dark urine is noted and acholia can be seen.

The combination of hyperbilirubinemia, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count with bandemia, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase elevations all suggest the diagnosis. Alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin are significantly higher inpatients with malignant rather than benign obstruction. In benign obstruction, the bilirubin rarely exceeds 12. Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and 5’-nucleotidase confirm a biliary origin of the alkaline phosphatase. The prothrombin time is often elevated. AST and ALT may be as high as 1000, especially if microabcesses form.

MRI and CT

CT has a higher sensitivity (63%) and is better to localize the site of obstruction.

MRI

(Images courtesy of RadsWiki)

Other Imaging Findings

  • Ultrasound: Diagnostic evaluation should proceed first with ultrasound which has an 55-85% sensitivity. Small stones in the common bile duct may be missed. The CBD may not be enlarged early or if the stones has passed. The ducts may be totally normal in PSC.

Treatment

80% of patients with acute cholangitis will respond to conservative therapy and elective drainage. In 15-20%, the cholangitis will progress requiring emergent drainage. Markers for these people are persistent abdominal pain, hypotensive, fever >102, and confusion.

Patients should be kept NPO, given IVF, broad spectrum ABX, Vitamin K and be drained. Choices for drainage are ERCP with stone removal and sphincterotomy/stent placement, surgically drainage or percutaneous drainage. Intrahepatic stones cannot be removed via ERCP and should be drained percutaneously. Randomized trials comparing ERCP and surgery showed morbidity and mortality benefit for ERCP (4.7-10% versus 10-50%). A nasobiliary catheter can be placed if ERCP is impossible (<5%) either because of coagulopathy precluding sphincterotomy, too large a stone (>2cm) etc. Next step should be percutaneous drainage as a bridge to elective surgery since emergent surgery has an up to 40% mortality.

References

Template:Gastroenterology


Template:WikiDoc Sources