Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


==Overview==
==Overview==
While echocardiography remains the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, simultaneous left and right heart catheterization demonstrates a pressure gradient such that the [[pulmonary capillary wedge pressure]] (a surrogate of the left atrial pressure) exceeds the [[left ventricular end diastolic pressure]].
While echocardiography remains the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, [[cardiac catheterization]] is useful to evaluate mitral stenosis when the results of the non-invasive testing are insufficient.  Simultaneous left and right heart catheterization demonstrate a [[pressure gradient]] such that the [[pulmonary capillary wedge pressure]] (a surrogate of the left atrial pressure) exceeds the [[left ventricular end diastolic pressure]].


==Cardiac catheterization==
==Cardiac Catheterization==
[[Image:Mitral_stenosis_pressure_tracings.png|300px|Intracardiac pressure measurements in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Pressure tracings in the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV) in an individual with severe mitral stenosis.  Blue areas represent the diastolic pressure gradient due to the stenotic valve.]]
A definitive method of assessing the severity of mitral stenosis is the simultaneous left heart catheterization and right heart catheterization.  The right heart catheterization gives the physician the mean [[pulmonary capillary wedge pressure]], which is a reflection of the left atrial pressure. The left heart catheterization, on the other hand, gives the pressure in the [[left ventricle]]. By simultaneously taking these pressures, it is possible to determine the gradient between the left atrium and right atrium during ventricular [[diastole]], which is a marker for the severity of mitral stenosis.  This method of evaluating mitral stenosis tends to over-estimate the degree of mitral stenosis, however, because of the time lag in the pressure tracings seen on the right heart catheterization and the slow Y descent seen on the wedge tracings. If a trans-septal puncture is made during right heart catheterization, however, the [[pressure gradient]] can accurately quantify the severity of mitral stenosis.


A definitive method of assessing the severity of mitral stenosis is the simultaneous left heart catheterization and right heart catheterization. The right heart catheterization gives the physician the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, which is a reflection of the left atrial pressure.  The left heart catheterization, on the other hand, gives the pressure in the left ventricle.  By simultaneously taking these pressures, it is possible to determine the gradient between the left atrium and right atrium during ventricular [[diastole]], which is a marker for the severity of mitral stenosis.  This method of evaluating mitral stenosis tends to over-estimate the degree of mitral stenosis, however, because of the time lag in the pressure tracings seen on the right heart catheterization and the slow Y descent seen on the wedge tracings.  If a trans-septal puncture is made during right heart catheterization, however, the pressure gradient can accurately quantify the severity of mitral stenosis.
Shown below is an image depicting intracardiac pressure measurements in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Pressure tracings in the [[left atrium]] (LA) and the [[left ventricle]] (LV) in an individual with severe mitral stenosis.  Blue areas represent the [[diastolic]] pressure gradient due to the stenotic valve.


==ACC/AHA Guidelines-Indications for Invasive Hemodynamic Evaluation of Mitral Stenosis (DO NOT EDIT) <ref name="pmid18848134">{{cite journal| author=Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD et al.| title=2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 2008 | volume= 52 | issue= 13 | pages= e1-142 | pmid=18848134 | doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18848134  }} </ref>==
[[Image:Mitral_stenosis_pressure_tracings.png|300px|Intracardiac pressure measurements in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Pressure tracings in the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV) in an individual with severe mitral stenosis.  Blue areas represent the diastolic pressure gradient due to the stenotic valve.]]
 
{{cquote|
===[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class I]]===
 
'''1.''' Cardiac catheterization for hemodynamic evaluation should be performed for assessment of severity of MS when noninvasive tests are inconclusive or when there is discrepancy between noninvasive tests and clinical findings regarding severity of MS. ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])
 
'''2.''' Catheterization for hemodynamic evaluation including left ventriculography (to evaluate severity of MR) for patients with MS is indicated when there is a discrepancy between the Doppler-derived mean gradient and valve area. ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])


===[[European society of cardiology#Classes of Recommendations|Class IIa]]===
== 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines<ref name="pmid33332150">{{cite journal| author=Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F | display-authors=etal| title=2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. | journal=Circulation | year= 2021 | volume= 143 | issue= 5 | pages= e72-e227 | pmid=33332150 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923 | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=33332150  }}</ref> ==
{| class="wikitable"
|-
| colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LightGreen" |[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class I]]
|-
| bgcolor="LightGreen" |1.   In patients with rheumatic MS and a discrepancy between resting echocardiographic findings and clinical symptoms, exercise testing with Doppler or invasive hemodynamic assessment is recommended to evaluate symptomatic response, exercise capacity, and the response of the mean mitral gradient and pulmonary artery pressure.''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C-LD]])''
|}


'''1.''' Cardiac catheterization is reasonable to assess the hemodynamic response of pulmonary artery and left atrial pressures to exercise when clinical symptoms and resting hemodynamics are discordant. ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])
==2008 and Incorporated 2006 ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease (DO NOT EDIT)<ref name="pmid18820172">{{cite journal |author=Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, ''et al.'' |title=2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons |journal=Circulation |volume=118 |issue=15 |pages=e523–661 |year=2008 |month=October |pmid=18820172 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748 |url=}}</ref>==


'''2.''' Cardiac catheterization is reasonable in patients with MS to assess the cause of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension when out of proportion to severity of MS as determined by noninvasive testing. ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])
===Invasive Hemodynamic Evaluation Indications (DO NOT EDIT)<ref name="pmid18820172">{{cite journal |author=Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, ''et al.'' |title=2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons |journal=Circulation |volume=118 |issue=15 |pages=e523–661 |year=2008 |month=October |pmid=18820172 |doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748 |url=}}</ref>===


===[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class III]]===
{|class="wikitable"
|-
| colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LightGreen"|[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class I]]
|-
| bgcolor="LightGreen"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' [[Cardiac catheterization]] for hemodynamic evaluation should be performed for assessment of severity of [[mitral stenosis]] when noninvasive tests are inconclusive or when there is discrepancy between noninvasive tests and clinical findings regarding severity of [[mitral stenosis]].''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|-
| bgcolor="LightGreen"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' [[Cardiac catheterization]] for hemodynamic evaluation including [[left ventriculography]] (to evaluate severity of [[mitral regurgitation]]) for patients with [[mitral stenosis]] is indicated when there is a discrepancy between the Doppler-derived mean gradient and valve area.''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|}


'''1.''' Diagnostic cardiac catheterization is not recommended to assess the MV hemodynamics when 2D and Doppler echocardiographic data are concordant with clinical findings. ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])}}
{|class="wikitable"
|-
| colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LightCoral"|[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class III]]
|-
| bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' Diagnostic [[cardiac catheterization]] is not recommended to assess the [[mitral valve]] hemodynamics when 2D and Doppler echocardiographic data are concordant with clinical findings.''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|}


==Sources==
{|class="wikitable"
*2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease <ref name="pmid18848134">{{cite journal| author=Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD et al.| title=2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. | journal=J Am Coll Cardiol | year= 2008 | volume= 52 | issue= 13 | pages= e1-142 | pmid=18848134 | doi=10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=18848134  }} </ref>.
|-
| colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LemonChiffon"|[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class IIa]]
|-
| bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' [[Cardiac catheterization]] is reasonable to assess the hemodynamic response of [[pulmonary artery]] and left atrial pressures to exercise when clinical symptoms and resting hemodynamics are discordant.''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|-
| bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' [[Cardiac catheterization]] is reasonable in patients with [[mitral stenosis]] to assess the cause of severe [[pulmonary arterial hypertension]] when out of proportion to severity of [[mitral stenosis]] as determined by noninvasive testing.''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki>
|}


==References==
==References==
Line 40: Line 57:
[[Category:Cardiac surgery]]
[[Category:Cardiac surgery]]
[[Category:Surgery]]
[[Category:Surgery]]
[[Category:Overview complete]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date cardiology]]
[[Category:For review]]
[[Category:Up-To-Date]]
[[Category:Template complete]]
[[Category:Best pages]]


{{WH}}
{{WH}}
{{WS}}
{{WS}}

Latest revision as of 01:44, 7 December 2022

Mitral Stenosis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Mitral Stenosis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Stages

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography

Cardiac MRI

Cardiac Catheterization

Treatment

Overview

Medical Therapy

Percutaneous Mitral Balloon Commissurotomy (PMBC)

Surgery

Follow Up

Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA onMitral stenosis cardiac catheterization

CDC on Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization

Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization in the news

Blogs on Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization

Directions to Hospitals Treating Mitral Stenosis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Mitral stenosis cardiac catheterization

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]

Overview

While echocardiography remains the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, cardiac catheterization is useful to evaluate mitral stenosis when the results of the non-invasive testing are insufficient. Simultaneous left and right heart catheterization demonstrate a pressure gradient such that the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (a surrogate of the left atrial pressure) exceeds the left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

Cardiac Catheterization

A definitive method of assessing the severity of mitral stenosis is the simultaneous left heart catheterization and right heart catheterization. The right heart catheterization gives the physician the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, which is a reflection of the left atrial pressure. The left heart catheterization, on the other hand, gives the pressure in the left ventricle. By simultaneously taking these pressures, it is possible to determine the gradient between the left atrium and right atrium during ventricular diastole, which is a marker for the severity of mitral stenosis. This method of evaluating mitral stenosis tends to over-estimate the degree of mitral stenosis, however, because of the time lag in the pressure tracings seen on the right heart catheterization and the slow Y descent seen on the wedge tracings. If a trans-septal puncture is made during right heart catheterization, however, the pressure gradient can accurately quantify the severity of mitral stenosis.

Shown below is an image depicting intracardiac pressure measurements in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Pressure tracings in the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV) in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Blue areas represent the diastolic pressure gradient due to the stenotic valve.

Intracardiac pressure measurements in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Pressure tracings in the left atrium (LA) and the left ventricle (LV) in an individual with severe mitral stenosis. Blue areas represent the diastolic pressure gradient due to the stenotic valve.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines[1]

Class I
1.   In patients with rheumatic MS and a discrepancy between resting echocardiographic findings and clinical symptoms, exercise testing with Doppler or invasive hemodynamic assessment is recommended to evaluate symptomatic response, exercise capacity, and the response of the mean mitral gradient and pulmonary artery pressure.(Level of Evidence: C-LD)

2008 and Incorporated 2006 ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease (DO NOT EDIT)[2]

Invasive Hemodynamic Evaluation Indications (DO NOT EDIT)[2]

Class I
"1. Cardiac catheterization for hemodynamic evaluation should be performed for assessment of severity of mitral stenosis when noninvasive tests are inconclusive or when there is discrepancy between noninvasive tests and clinical findings regarding severity of mitral stenosis.(Level of Evidence: C) "
"2. Cardiac catheterization for hemodynamic evaluation including left ventriculography (to evaluate severity of mitral regurgitation) for patients with mitral stenosis is indicated when there is a discrepancy between the Doppler-derived mean gradient and valve area.(Level of Evidence: C) "
Class III
"1. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization is not recommended to assess the mitral valve hemodynamics when 2D and Doppler echocardiographic data are concordant with clinical findings.(Level of Evidence: C) "
Class IIa
"1. Cardiac catheterization is reasonable to assess the hemodynamic response of pulmonary artery and left atrial pressures to exercise when clinical symptoms and resting hemodynamics are discordant.(Level of Evidence: C) "
"2. Cardiac catheterization is reasonable in patients with mitral stenosis to assess the cause of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension when out of proportion to severity of mitral stenosis as determined by noninvasive testing.(Level of Evidence: C) "

References

  1. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Gentile F; et al. (2021). "2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 143 (5): e72–e227. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. PMID 33332150 Check |pmid= value (help).
  2. 2.0 2.1 Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K; et al. (2008). "2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons". Circulation. 118 (15): e523–661. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190748. PMID 18820172. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WH Template:WS