Incidentaloma differential diagnosis

Revision as of 18:13, 30 August 2017 by Medhat (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Incidentaloma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Incidentaloma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Incidentaloma differential diagnosis On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Incidentaloma differential diagnosis

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Incidentaloma differential diagnosis

CDC on Incidentaloma differential diagnosis

Incidentaloma differential diagnosis in the news

Blogs on Incidentaloma differential diagnosis

Directions to Hospitals Treating Psoriasis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Incidentaloma differential diagnosis

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief:

Overview

[Disease name] must be differentiated from other diseases that cause [clinical feature 1], [clinical feature 2], and [clinical feature 3], such as [differential dx1], [differential dx2], and [differential dx3].

Differentiating Incidentaloma from other Diseases

  • [Disease name] must be differentiated from [[differential dx1], [differential dx2], and [differential dx3]
Differential Diagnosis Clinical picture Imagings Laboratory tests
Adrenal adenoma
  • Round and homogeneous density, smooth contour and sharp margination [15]
  • Diameter less than 4 cm, unilateral location
  • Low unenhanced CT attenuation values (<10 HU) (image 1)
  • Rapid contrast medium washout (10 minutes after administration of contrast, an absolute contrast medium washout of more than 50 percent)
  • Isointensity with liver on both T1 and T2 weighted MRI sequences
  • Chemical shift evidence of lipid on MRI
Adrenocortical carcinoma
  • Mass effect symptoms; symptoms related to excess glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, androgen, or estrogen secretion
  • Irregular shape
  • Inhomogeneous density because of central areas of low attenuation due to tumor necrosis (image 4)
  • Tumor calcification
  • Diameter usually >4 cm
  • Unilateral location
  • High unenhanced CT attenuation values (>20 HU)
  • Inhomogeneous enhancement on CT with intravenous contrast
  • Delay in contrast medium washout (10 minutes after administration of contrast, an absolute contrast medium washout of less than 50 percent)
  • Hypointensity compared with liver on T1 weighted MRI and high to intermediate signal intensity on T2 weighted MRI
  • High standardized uptake value (SUV) on FDG-PET-CT study
  • Evidence of local invasion or metastases
  • Serum DHEAS
  • Measures of clinicallyindicated
  • steroid
Cushing's syndrome
  • Imaging may show adenoma if presents
Pheochromocytoma
  • Increased attenuation on nonenhanced CT (>20 HU)
  • Increased mass vascularity (image 2)
  • Delay in contrast medium washout (10 minutes after administration of contrast, an absolute contrast medium washout of less than 50 percent)
  • High signal intensity on T2 weighted MRI (image 3)
  • Cystic and hemorrhagic changes
  • Variable size and may be bilateral
Adrenal metastasis
    • Symptoms and signs of primary malignancy especially lung cancer.
    • General constitutional symptoms:
    • Fever
    • Fatigue
    • Weight loss
  • Irregular shape and inhomogeneous nature
  • Tendency to be bilateral
  • High unenhanced CT attenuation values (>20 HU) and enhancement with intravenous contrast on CT
  • Delay in contrast medium washout (10 minutes after administration of contrast, an absolute contrast medium washout of less than 50 percent)
  • Isointensity or slightly less intense than the liver on T1 weighted MRI and high to intermediate signal intensity on T2 weighted MRI (representing an increased water content)
  • Elevated standardized uptake value on FDG-PET scan

References

Template:WH Template:WS