Sandbox Thymoma staging

Revision as of 22:58, 28 February 2014 by Gerald Chi- (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thymoma Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Thymoma from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Sandbox Thymoma staging On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sandbox Thymoma staging

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Sandbox Thymoma staging

CDC on Sandbox Thymoma staging

Sandbox Thymoma staging in the news

Blogs on Sandbox Thymoma staging

Directions to Hospitals Treating Thymoma

Risk calculators and risk factors for Sandbox Thymoma staging

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Amr Marawan, M.D. [2]

Overview

Staging of thymic epithelial tumors was initially proposed by Bergh and his colleagues in 1978,[1] modified by Wilkins and Castleman in 1979,[2] and advanced by Masaoka et al. in 1981 and became widely adopted.[3][4] In 1999, World Health Organization (WHO) proposed

  • There is no universally accepted system; no AJCC staging exists.
  • Historically, a classifiaction system used both histological features and clinical behavior.
  • Masaoka staging is the clinically used staging system, although it may not be predictive for thymic carcinoma.
  • GETT staging is the surgical staging system, and may have better correlation with outcome.
  • A meta-analysis from UCLA suggests that evaluation of transcapsular extension (Stage I vs. Stage IIa) is of no clinical value, as they have same DFS and OS outcomes.


GETT Staging

  • Stage IA - Encapsulated, completely resected.
  • Stage IB - Macroscopically completely resected but suspicion of mediastinal adhesions or potential capsular invasion at surgery.
  • Stage II - Invasive tumor, completely resected.
  • Stage IIIA - Invasive tumor, subtotal resection.
  • Stage IIIB - Invasive tumor, biopsy alone.
  • Stage IVa - Supraclav or pleural met.
  • Stage IVb - Distant metastases.[5]


Historical Classification

Modified Masaoka-Koga Staging (1994)[6]
Stage Description
I Grossly and microscopically completely encapsulated
II1 Microscopic transcapsular invasion
II2 Macroscopic invasion into thymic or surrounding fatty tissue, or grossly adherent to but not breaking
through mediastinal pleura or pericardium
III Macroscopic invasion of neighboring organ (i.e., pericardium, great vessel, or lung)
IVa Pleural or pericardial dissemination
IVb Lymphatic or hematogenous metastasis


TNM Classification by Yamakawa and Masaoka (1991)[7]
T/N/M Stage Description
T factor T1 Macroscopically completely encapsulated and microscopically no capsular invasion
T2 Macroscopically adhesion or invasion into surrounding fatty tissue or mediastinal pleura,
or microscopic invasion into capsule
T3 Invasion into neighboring organs, such as pericardium, great vessels, and lung
T4 Pleural or pericardial dissemination
N factor N0 No lymph node metastasis
N1 Metastasis to anterior mediastinal lymph nodes
N2 Metastasis to intrathoracic lymphnodes except anterior mediastinal lymph nodes
N3 Metastasis to extrathoracic lymphnodes
M factor M0 No hematogenous metastasis
M1 Hematogenous metastasis


Masaoka Staging System (1981)[3]
Stage Description
I Macroscopically completely encapsulated and microscopically no capsular invasion
II1 Macroscopic invasion into surrounding fatty tissue or mediastinal pleura
II2 Microscopic invasion into capsule
III Macroscopic invasion into neighboring organ, ie, pericardium, great vessels, or lung
IVa Pleural or pericardial dissemination
IVb Lymphogenous or hematogenous metastasis


Clinical Staging by Bergh (1978) and Wilkins (1979)[1][2]
Author Stage Description
Bergh et al. I Intact capsule or growth within the capsule
II Pericapsular growth into the mediastinal fat tissue
III Invasive growth into the surrounding organs and/or intrathoracic metastases
Wilkins et al. I Intact capsule or growth within the capsule
II Pericapsular growth into the mediastinal fat tissue or adjacent pleura or pericardium
III Invasive growth into the surrounding organs and/or intrathoracic metastases


References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Bergh, NP.; Gatzinsky, P.; Larsson, S.; Lundin, P.; Ridell, B. (1978). "Tumors of the thymus and thymic region: I. Clinicopathological studies on thymomas". Ann Thorac Surg. 25 (2): 91–8. PMID 626543. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. 2.0 2.1 Wilkins, EW.; Castleman, B. (1979). "Thymoma: a continuing survey at the Massachusetts General Hospital". Ann Thorac Surg. 28 (3): 252–6. PMID 485626. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. 3.0 3.1 Masaoka, A.; Monden, Y.; Nakahara, K.; Tanioka, T. (1981). "Follow-up study of thymomas with special reference to their clinical stages". Cancer. 48 (11): 2485–92. PMID 7296496. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Kondo, K. (2005). "Invited commentary". Ann Thorac Surg. 80 (6): 2000–1. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.053. PMID 16305832. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. "Seventeen years of surgical treatmen... [Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991] - PubMed - NCBI".
  6. Koga, K.; Matsuno, Y.; Noguchi, M.; Mukai, K.; Asamura, H.; Goya, T.; Shimosato, Y. (1994). "A review of 79 thymomas: modification of staging system and reappraisal of conventional division into invasive and non-invasive thymoma". Pathol Int. 44 (5): 359–67. PMID 8044305. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  7. Yamakawa, Y.; Masaoka, A.; Hashimoto, T.; Niwa, H.; Mizuno, T.; Fujii, Y.; Nakahara, K. (1991). "A tentative tumor-node-metastasis classification of thymoma". Cancer. 68 (9): 1984–7. PMID 1913546. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)