Sandbox:huda

Jump to navigation Jump to search



Overview

This section provides a short and straight to the point overview of the disease or symptom. The first sentence of the overview must contain the name of the disease.

Birth Control Options

Female birth control options

Long acting reversible contraception(LARC): 99% effective, high rate of satisfaction, long-term use, quick return to fertility when discontinued

  • IUDs (> 99% effective)
    • Copper IUD: effective for up to 10 years, used for patients with light menstrual periods, desire long-term contraception, not prefer using hormonal contraception
    • Progestin-releasing IUD, effective for up to 5 years, for patients with heavy menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea
  • Subdermal implant (> 99% effective), effective for up to 3 years, SE: unscheduled bleeding, weight gain, headache. Ovulation and fertility occur within one month after removal
  • Depot Medroxyprogesterone, IM injection given every 3 months (94% effective),
  • Combined hormonal contraceptives
    • Oral contraceptive (estrogen/progestin pills) (OCPs) (91% effective)
    • Birth Control Patch (91% effective)
    • Vaginal Ring (91% effective)
  • Barrier Methods
    • Diaphragm
    • Cervical Cap
    • Sponge
  • Spermicide (80% failure rate if used alone). Should be used with cervical cap or diaphragm, may damage the genital epithelium and increase risk of acquiring SDIs
  • Natural contraception (Natural Family Planning and Fertility Awareness)
    • Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) (Breastfeeding can help with child spacing)
  • Abstinence
  • Permanent Sterilization

Emergency contraception


Male birth control options

Barrier contraception (Condoms) (80% effective), the only type of contraception that prevent sexual transmitted infections

Vasectomy

Withdrawal (coitus interruptus) (75% effective)


Note:

  • You can use IUD in a nulliparous female
  • Progestin subdermal implant is more effective that IUD (failure rate .2-.8%) and female fertilization (.5% failure rate)


Indications

  • Pregnancy prevention
  • Treatment of different conditions such as:
    • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): OCPs are used for menstrual regulation
    • Endometriosis
    • Amenorrhea
    • Dysmenorrhea
    • Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS)
    • Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI)
    • Heavy Menstrual Periods
    • Acne


Contraindications

Oral contraceptives (estrogen) alter the transport and tissue delivery of thyroid hormone by increasing the synthesis of throxine-binding globulin , relative hypothyroid state in patients with hypothyroidism. Increase the dose of levothyroxine when starting OCPs.

Combined hormonal contraceptives

Absolute contraindications

  • Less than 6 wks postpartum
  • Smoking (age > 35, and >15 cigarettes per day)
  • Hypertension (systolic > 160mmHg or diastolic > 100mmHg)
  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (current of past history)
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Cerebrovascular accident history
  • Complicated valvular heart disease (pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, history of subacute bacterial endocarditis)
  • Migraine headache with aura or focal neurological symptoms
  • Breast cancer (current)
  • Diabetes with retinopathy/nephropathy/neuropathy
  • Severe cirrhosis
  • Liver tumor (adenoma or hepatoma)


IUDs

  • Uterine anomalies
  • Active pelvic infection

Relative contraindications

  • Smoker over the age of 35 (< 15 cigarettes per day)
  • Adequately controlled hypertension
  • Hypertension (systolic 140 - 159mmHg or diastolic 90 - 99mmHg)
  • Migrain headache over the age of 35
  • Currently symptomatic gallbladder disease
  • Mild cirrhosis
  • History of combined OCP-related cholestasis

Medications that interfere with OCPs:

Subdermal implant

  • Progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer


Do's

  • Increase the levothyroxine dose in patients with hypothyroidism who started taking OCPs. OCPs (estrogen) increases the liver synthesis of thyroxin-binding globulin (TBG)
  • OCPs also decrease the effect of Warfarin, so consider increasing the dose

Don'ts

  • The content in this section is in bullet points.

References

FIRE: Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation

A Focused Initial Rapid Evaluation (FIRE) should be performed to identify patients in need of immediate intervention.

Boxes in red signify that an urgent management is needed.

Abbreviations: CAD: coronary artery disease; DVT: deep venous thrombosis; ECG: electrocardiogram; ICU: intensive care unit; JVD: jugular venous distension; LBBB: left bundle branch block; NSTEMI: non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI: ST elevation myocardial infarction; TEE: transesophageal echocardiography



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Order ECG
Order serial cardiac biomarkers (troponins) and CK MB
Perform a bedside echocardiography (if available)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Does the patient fulfill the criteria of myocardial infarction?

❑ Rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarker, preferably troponin, with at least one of the measurements >99th percentile of the upper limit of normal

PLUS at least one of the following

❑ Symptoms of ischemia
❑ New ST-T wave changes

ST-T wave changes in STEMI:
ST elevation in at least 2 contiguous leads of 2 mm (0.2 mV) in men or 1.5 mm (0.15 mV) in women in leads V2–V3 and/or of 1 mm (0.1mV) in other contiguous chest leads or the limb leads, OR
ST depression in at least two precordial leads V1-V4 (suggestive of posterior MI), OR
ST depression in several leads plus ST elevation in lead aVR (suggestive of occlusion of the left main or proximal LAD artery)

ST-T wave changes in NSTEMI:
❑ No changes
❑ Non specific ST- T wave changes
T wave inversion
ST depression in at least 2 contiguous leads

❑ New LBBB
❑ New Q wave

❑ New regional wall abnormality or new myocardial loss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes
 
No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rule out the following life-threatening conditions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Aortic dissection
 
Pulmonary embolism
 
Tension pneumothorax
 
Esophageal rupture
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Look for supportive symptoms and signs:

❑ Sudden onset of chest pain radiating to the back or interscapular pain
Acute heart failure
Syncope
❑ Low pitched early diastolic murmur best heard at the 2nd right intercostal space
❑ Asymmetric blood pressure in the upper extremities
Coma
❑ Diminution or absence of pulse
Altered mental status
❑ Evidence of ischemia

❑ Splanchnic ischemia
❑ Renal insufficiency
❑ Lower extremity ischemia
❑ Focal neurologic deficits
 
Look for supportive symptoms and signs:

Pleuritic chest pain
Dyspnea
Anxiety
❑ History of:

DVT
❑ Recent surgery
Malignancy
❑ Immobility
 
Look for supportive symptoms and signs:

❑ Sudden onset of shortness of breath
Cyanosis
Penetrating chest wound
❑ Flopping sound
❑ Recent medical procedure
❑ Patient on mechanical ventilation
❑ Tracheal deviation towards the unaffected side
❑ Absent heart sound on the affected side

❑ Hyperresonance on the affected side
 
Look for supportive symptoms and signs:

Vomiting
❑ Lower chest pain
Hematemesis
❑ Cervical subcutaneous emphysema
❑ Overindulgence in alcohol

❑ Overindulgence in food
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click here for the detailed management
 
Click here for the detailed management
 
Click here for the detailed management
 
Click here for the detailed management

Acidosis

Historical perspective

PH = 7.3-7.5




COVID-19 and DM

Diagnosis

  • The gold standard test for the diagnosis of DM in covid-19 microbiologic analysis



The diagnosis of COVID-19 cannot be made without microbiologic analysis.



COVID-19 Microchapter outline

Pulmonary Complications

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pulmonary complications
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
COVID-19 approach to hypoxia/hypoxemia
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ARDS
 
Pulmonary embolism
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bacterial pneumonia/super-infection
 
Co-infection (e.g. flue)
 
 
 
 
 
Pulmonary hypertension
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Microchapter Template
 
Microchapter Template
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Microchapter Template
 
Microchapter Template
 
 
 
 
 
Microchapter Template














Medication

Hydroxychloroquine

215 studies worldwide 55 studies in the USA Placebo: Vitamin D, Pacebo: Calcium citrate, Vit C, Mannitol, glucose tablets, Folic Acid, Ascorbic Acid Combination/comparison: Drug: Vitamin D, Zinc sulfate, Azythromycin, Doxycycline,Indomethacin, Zithromax Oral Product, Ivermectin, Camostat Mesilate, Bromhexine, Nitazoxanide, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Sirolimus, Telmisartan, Active Comparator (Ciclesonide inhalor), Favipiravir, diltiazem and niclosamide, Clevudine, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Favipiravir, Interferon-β 1a, Bromhexine, Baricitinib, Nitazoxanide,



Purpose of study:

Primary prevention Post-exposure prophylaxis Treatment Clinical improvement Viral load clearance from Nasopharyngeal sample

Design/Strategy:

Phase 2 vs 3 vs 4 2 arm study vs 4 arm study Dose-based (200 vs 400 vs 600 mg) Frequenc-based ( Once vs twice vs trice per day) Duration-based (5 vs 10 vs 14 ... days)

Hydroxychloroquine

Country Intervention Objective Design&Date Strategy Outcome
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)

(Preprint article)

Treatment efficacy evaluation
  • February 4 to February 28, 2020
  • 62 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis
  • Participants were randomized in a parallel-group trial
  • Males: 46.8%; Female: 53.2%; Mean age: 44.7 years. age and sex were adjusted between the control group and the HCQ group
  • 31 patients treatment group
  • A 5-day HCQ (400 mg/d) treatment
  • The HCQ effect was evaluated at baseline and 5 days after treatment by assessing the following:
    • Time to clinical recovery (TTCR), clinical characteristics, and radiological results
  • TTCR, the body temperature recovery time and the cough remission time were significantly shortened in the HCQ treatment group
  • (80.6%, 25 of 31of patients with improved pneumonia in the HCQ treatment group compared with the control group (54.8%, 17 of 31)
  • 4 patients progressed to severe illness that occurred in the control group
  • 2 patients with mild adverse reactions in the HCQ treatment group
  • Conclusion: The use of HCQ could significantly shorten TTCR and promote the absorption of pneumonia in patients with COVID-19
Méditerranée Infection University Hospital Institute in Marseille, France Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin Treatment efficacy evaluation
  • Early March to March 16th
  • 36 out of 42 patients meeting the inclusion criteria
  • 6 lost to follow up
  • 20 hydroxychloroquine-treated patients
  • 16 control patients
  • Patients were included in a single-arm protocol
  • Inclusion criteria:
    • Age >12 years
    • PCR documented SARS-CoV-2 carriage in nasopharyngeal sample at admission regardless of the clinical status
  • Control was untreated patients from another center and cases refusing the protocol
  • Endpoint: presence and absence of virus at Day6-post inclusion
  • 600mg of HCQ daily
    • 200 mg, three times per day for ten days
  • Viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs was tested daily in a hospital setting

Azithromycin:

  • Added depending on the clinical presentation
  • 500mg on day1 followed by 250mg per day, the next four days
  • To prevent bacterial super-infection under daily electrocardiogram control
  • There was a statistically significant difference between treated patients and controls at days 3-4-5 and 6 (negative PCR)
  • At day 6, 70% of HCQ-treated patients were virologically cured comparing with 12.5% in the control group (p= 0.001)

HCQ vs HCQ-Azithromycin combination

  • There was a statistically significant difference between treated patients and controls at days 3-4-5 and 6 (negative PCR)
  • At day 6, 100% of patients treated with HCQ and azithromycin combination were virologically cured comparing with 57.1% in patients treated with HCQ only, and 12.5% in the control group (p < 0.001)

Conclusion:

  • HCQ is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria, Spain HDQ Chemoprophylaxis
  • Start scheduled for the second week of May 2020
  • Prospective, single center, double blind, randomised, controlled trial (RCT)
  • 450 Adult health-care professionals (18-65 years)
  • Working in areas of high exposure and high risk of transmission of SARS-COV-2
  • Oral Hydroxychloroquine 200mg, once-daily, for two months (HC group) or placebo (P group)
    1. Intervention: (n = 225): One 200 mg hydroxychloroquine sulfate coated tablet once daily for two months.
    2. Comparator (control group) (n = 225): One hydroxychloroquine placebo tablet (identical to that of the drug) once daily for two months
  • In addition to the protective measures appropriate to the level of exposure established by the hospital.
  • A serological evaluation every 15 days with PCR in case of seroconversion, symptoms or risk exposure.
Eight hospitals in Spain Melatonin Prophylaxis Recruitement (May 21-31)

450 participants

225 in the experimental arm

225 in the placebo arm.

Experimental: Melatonin (Circadin®, 2 mg of melatonin orally before bedtime for 12 weeks.

Comparator: Identical looking placebo, orally before bedtime for 12 weeks.

References