Group C nerve fiber

(Redirected from C fibers)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Infobox Anatomy

Structure and Anatomy

Location

C fibers are found in the peripheral nerves of the somatic sensory system [1]. They are unique because unlike most other nerves in the nervous system, they are unmyelinated [1]. This lack of myelination is the cause of their slow conduction velocity, which is on the order of no more than 2 m/s [1]. C fibers are on average .2-1.5 μm in diameter [1].

Structure

C fibers are a type of axon that classifies its attached free nerve endings, which are pain-sensing nociceptors [1]. The other main classification of nociceptors is Aδ fibers [1]. These fibers have axons that are larger (1-5 μm), in diameter, are thinly myelinated, and have a higher conduction velocity, which is on the order of about 20 m/s [1].

Remak bundles

C fiber axons are grouped together into what is known as Remak bundles [2]. These occur when an unmyelinated Schwann cell bundles the axons close together by surrounding them [3]. The Schwann cell keeps them from touching each other by squeezing its cytoplasm between the axons [3]. The condition of Remak bundles varies with age [3]. The number of C fiber axons in each Remak bundle varies with location [2]. For example in a rat model, large bundles of greater than 20 axons are found exiting the L5 dorsal root ganglion, while smaller bundles of average 3 axons are found in distal nerve segments [2]. Multiple neurons contribute axons to the Remak bundle with an average ratio of about 2 axons contributed per bundle [2]. The cross sectional area of a Remak bundle is proportional to the number of axons found inside it [2]. Remak bundles in the distal peripheral nerve are clustered with other Remak bundles [2]. The Remak Schwann cells have been shown to be electrochemically responsive to action potentials of the axons contained within them [2].

In experiments where nerve injury is caused but nearby C fibers remain intact, increased spontaneous activity in the C fibers is observed [2]. This phenomenon supports the theory that damaged nerve fibers may release factors that alter the function of neighboring undamaged fibers [2]. Study of Remak bundles has important implications in nerve regeneration after sustaining injury [2]. Currently, recovery of distal C fiber function takes months and may still only regain incomplete function [2]. This may result in abnormal sensory function or neuropathic pain [2]. Remak bundles are thought to release certain trophic factors that promote the regeneration of the damaged axons [2].

Pathway

C fibers synapse to second-order projection neurons in the spinal cord at the upper laminae of the dorsal horn in the substantia gelatinosa [4]. The second-order projection neurons are of the wide dynamic range (WDR) type, which receive input from both nociceptive terminals as well as myelinated A-type fibers [4]. There are three types of second order projection neurons in the spinothalamic tract: wide dynamic range (WDR), high threshold (HT), and low threshold (LT) [5]. These classifications are based on their responses to mechanical stimuli [5]. The second-order neurons ascend to the brain stem and thalamus in the ventrolateral, or anterolateral, quadrant of the contralateral half of the spinal cord, forming the spinothalamic tract [1]. The spinothalamic tract is the main pathway associated with pain and temperature perception, which immediately crosses the spinal cord laterally [1]. This crossover feature is clinically important because it allows for identification of the location of injury.

Function

Because of their higher conduction velocity, Aδ fibers are responsible for the sensation of a sharp first pain [1]. They respond to a weaker intensity of stimulus [1]. C fibers, however, respond to a stronger intensity of stimulus and are responsible for the slow, dull, longer-lasting, second pain [1].

C fibers are considered polymodal because they can respond to thermal, mechanical, and chemical stimuli [1]. C fibers respond to all kinds of physiological changes in the body [6]. For example, they can respond to hypoxia, hypoglycemia, hypo-osmolarity, the presence of muscle metabolic products, and even light or sensitive touch [6]. C fiber receptors include:

  • C fiber nociceptors
    • responsible for the second, burning pain
  • C fiber warming specific receptors
    • responsible for warmth
  • ultra-slow histamine-selective C fibers
    • responsible for itch
  • tactile C fibers
    • sensual touch
  • C mechano- and metabo- receptors in muscles or joints
    • responsible for muscle exercise, burn and cramp [6]

This variation of input signals calls for a variety of cells of the cortex in lamina 1 to have different modality-selectiveness and morphologies [6]. These varying neurons are responsible for the different feelings we perceive in our body and can be classified by their responses to ranges of stimuli [6]. The brain uses the integration of these signals to maintain homeostasis in the body whether it is temperature related or pain related [6].

Vanilliod Receptor

The vanilliod receptor (VR-1) is a receptor that is found on the free nerve endings of both C and Aδ fibers that responds to elevated levels of heat (>43°C) and the chemical capsaicin [1]. Capsaicin activates C fibers by opening a ligand-gated ion channel and causing an action potential to occur [1]. Because this receptor responds to both capsaicin and heat, chili peppers are sensed as hot [1]. VR-1 is also able to respond to extracellular acidification and can integrate simultaneous exposure to all three sensory stimuli [7]. VR1 is essential for the inflammatory sensitization to noxious thermal stimuli [7]. A second type of receptor, a vanilliod-like receptor (TRPV1), has a higher threshold of activation regarding heat of about 52°C and also does not respond to capsaicin [1]. Both types of receptors are transmembrane receptors that are closed during resting conditions [1]. When open, these receptors allow for an influx of sodium and calcium which initiates an action potential across the fibers [1]. Both receptors are part of a larger family of receptors called transient receptor potential (TRP) receptors [1]. If damage to these heat transducer receptors occurs, the result can be chronic neuropathic pain caused by lowering the heat pain threshold for their phosphorylation [8].

Role in Neuropathic Pain

Activation of nociceptors is not necessary to cause the sensation of pain [8]. Damage or injury to nerve fibers that normally respond to innocuous stimuli like light touch may lower their activation threshold needed to respond; this change causes the organism to feel intense pain from the lightest of touch [8]. Neuropthaic pain syndromes are caused by lesions or diseases of the parts of the nervous system that normally signal pain [9]. There are four main classes:

After a nerve lesion of either C fibers or Aδ fibers, they become abnormally sensitive and cause pathological spontaneous activity [4]. This alteration of normal activity is explained by molecular and cellular changes of the primary afferent nociceptors in response to the nerve damage [4]. The abnormal activity of the damaged nerves is associated with the increased presence of mRNA for voltage-gated sodium channels [10]. Irregular grouping of these channels in sites of the abnormal activity may be responsible for lowering the activation threshold, thus leading to hyperactivity [10].

Central Sensitization

After nerve damage, WDR neurons experience a general increase in excitability [4]. This hyper-excitability can be caused by an increased neuronal response to a noxious stimulus, a larger neuronal receptive field, or spread of the hyper-excitability to other segments [4]. This condition is maintained by C fibers [4]. C fibers cause central sensitization of the dorsal horn in the spinal cord in response to their hyperactivity [4]. The mechanism underlying this phenomenon involves the release of glutamate by these pathologically sensitized C fibers [4]. Presynaptic neuronal voltage-gated N-calcium channels contribute to central sensitization by the release of glutamate and the neuropeptide, substance P [4]. After a nerve lesion, these presynaptic channels are over expressed [4]. The glutamate interacts with the postsynaptic NMDA receptors, which aids the sensitization of the dorsal horn [4]. Once this abnormal central sensitization is established, previously non-noxious stimuli evoke a pain response [4].

Central sensitization of the dorsal horn neurons that is evoked from C fiber activity is responsible for temporal summation of “second pain” (TSSP) [11]. This event is called ‘windup’ and relies on a frequency greater or equal to 0.33[[Hertz | Hz] of the stimulus [11]. Windup is associated with chronic pain and central sensitization [11]. This minimum frequency was determined experimentally by comparing healthy patient fMRI’s when subjected to varying frequencies of heat pulses [11]. The fMRI maps show common areas activated by the TSSP responses which include contralateral thalamus (THAL), S1, bilateral S2, anterior and posterior insula (INS), mid-anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and supplemental motor areas (SMA) [11]. TSSP events are also associated with other regions of the brain that process functions such as somatosensory processing, pain perception and modulation, cognition, pre-motor activity in the cortex [11].

Treatment

Currently, the availability of drugs proven to treat neuropathic pain is limited and varies widely from patient to patient [8]. Many developed drugs have either been discovered by accident or by observation [8]. Some past treatments include opiates like poppy extract, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs like salicylic acid, and cocaine [8]. Other recent treatments consist of antidepressants and anticonvulsants, although no substantial research on the actual mechanism of these treatments has been performed [8]. However, patients respond differently to these treatments possibly because of gender differences or genetic backgrounds [8]. Therefore, researchers have come to realize that no one drug or one class of drugs will reduce all pain [8]. Research is now focusing on the underlying mechanisms involved in pain perception and how it can go wrong in order to develop an appropriate drug for patients afflicted with neuropathic pain [8].

Microneurography

Microneurography is a technique using metal electrodes to observe neural traffic of both myelinated and unmyelinated axons in efferent and afferent neurons of the skin and muscle [12]. This technique is particularly important in research involving C fibers [12]. Single action potentials from unmyelinated axons can be observed [12]. Recordings from efferent postganglionic sympathetic C fibers of the muscles and skin yield important insights into the neural control autonomic effector organs like blood vessels and sweat glands [12]. Readings of afferent discharges from C nociceptors identified by marking method have also proved as important tools to revealing the mechanisms underlying sensations such as itch [12].

Unfortunately, interpretation of the microneurographic readings can be difficult because axonal membrane potential can not be determined from this method [13]. A supplemental method used to better understand these readings involves examining recordings of post-spike excitability and shifts in latency; these features are associated with changes in membrane potential of unmyelinated axons like C fibers [13]. Moalem-Taylor et. al. experimentally used chemical modulators with known effects on membrane potential to study the post-spike super-excitability of C fibers [13]. The researchers found three resulting events [13]. Chemical medulators can produce a combination of loss of super-excitability along with increased axonal excitability, indicating membrane depolarization [13]. Secondly, membrane hyperpolarization can result from a blockade of axonal hyperpolarization-activated current [13]. Lastly, a non-specific increase in surface charge and a change in the voltage-dependent activation of sodium channels results from the application of calcium [13].

References

  1. ↑ 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 Purves, Dale (2004). Neuroscience. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. ISBN 0-87893-725-0. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  2. ↑ 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 2.11 2.12 Murinson, BB (2004). "C-fiber structure varies with location in peripheral nerve". Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 63: 246–254. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Fagan, Tom (2003). "Glial Cells Critical for Peripheral Nervous System Health". News from Harvard Medical, Dental and Public Health Schools.
  4. ↑ 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 Baron, Ralph (2006). "Mechanisms of Disease: neuropathic pain—a clinical perspective". Nature Clinical Practice Neurology. 2.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Chung, J.M. (1979). "Excitation of primate spinothalamic neurons by cutaneous C-fiber volleys". .” Journal of Neurophysiology. 42: 1354–1369. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Craig, AD (2003). "Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 13: 500–505.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Davis, JB (2000). "Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia". Nature. 405: 183–7. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 Scholz, Joachim (2002). "Can we conquer pain?". Nature Neuroscience. 5: 1062–1067. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  9. ↑ Baron, Ralph (2000). "Peripheral neuropathic pain: from mechanisms to symptoms". Clinical Journal of Pain. 16: S12–20.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Lai, J (2003). "The role of voltage-gated sodium channels in neuropathic pain". Current Opinion Neurobiology. 13: 291–297.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 Staud, Roland (2007). "Brain activity related to temporal summation of C-fiber evoked pain". Pain (1-2 ed.). 129: 130–142. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Mano, Tadaaki (2006). "Microneurography as a tool in clinical neurophysiology to investigate peripheral neural traffic in humans". Clinical Neurophysiology. 117: 2357–2384. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 13.6 Moalem-Taylor, Gila (2007). "Post-spike excitability indicates changes in membrane potential of isolated c-fibers". Muscle and Nerve. 36: 172–182. Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help)


See also

Template:Jb1 Template:WH Template:WikiDoc Sources

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php?title=Group_C_nerve_fiber&oldid=675712"