Atherosclerosis medical therapy
|
Atherosclerosis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
ACC/AHA Guideline Recommendations |
|
Case Studies |
|
Atherosclerosis medical therapy On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Atherosclerosis medical therapy |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Atherosclerosis medical therapy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]
Overview
If atherosclerosis leads to symptoms, some symptoms such as angina pectoris can be treated. Non-pharmaceutical means are usually the first method of treatment, such as cessation of smoking and practicing regular exercise. If these methods do not work, medicines are usually the next step in treating cardiovascular diseases, and with improvements, have increasingly become the most effective method over the long term. However, medicines are criticized for their expense, patented control and occasional undesired effects.
Medical Therapy
Lipoprotein imbalances, upper normal and especially elevated blood sugar, i.e. diabetes, high blood pressure, homocysteine, stopping smoking, taking anticoagulants (anti-clotting agents) which target clotting factors, taking omega 3 oils from fatty fish or plant oils such as flax or canola oils, exercising and losing weight are the usual focus of treatments which have proved to be helpful in clinical trials. The target serum cholesterol level is ideally equal or less than 4mmol/L (160 mg/dL) and triglycerides equal or less than 2mmol/L 180 (mg/dL).
In general, the group of medications referred to as statins has seen popularity yet they are not approved in most jurisdictions for treating atherosclerosis. They have relatively few short-term undesirable side-effects and have shown some effect in reducing atherosclerotic disease 'events' in some but not all studies such as ALLHAT.
The newest statin, rosuvastatin, has been the first to demonstrate regression of atherosclerotic plaque within the coronary arteries by IVUS evaluation.[1] The study was not set up to demonstrate clinical benefit or harm. However, for most people, changing their physiologic behaviors, from the usual high risk to greatly reduced risk, requires a combination of several compounds, taken on a daily basis and indefinitely. More and more human treatment trials have been done and are ongoing which demonstrate improved outcome for those people using more complex and effective treatment regimens which change physiologic behaviour patterns to more closely resemble those humans exhibit in childhood at a time before fatty streaks begin forming.
Lowering lipoprotein little a, a genetic variant of LDL, can be achieved with large daily doses of vitamin B3, niacin. Niacin also tends to shift LDL particle distribution to larger particle size and improve HDL functioning. Work on increasing HDL particle concentration and function, beyond the niacin effect, perhaps even more important, is slowly advancing. Combinations of statins, niacin, intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibiting supplements (ezetimibe and others, and to a much lesser extent fibrates have been the most successful in changing dyslipidemia patterns and but, in the case of inhibitors and fibrates without improving clinical outcomes in secondary prevention. In primary prevention, cholesterol lowering agents have not reduced the mortality rates, for example the AFCAPS/TexCAPS and EXCEL trials and the 2 main trials with atorvastatin, Lipitor, as in the ASCOT and SPARCL studies. Dietary changes to achieve benefit have been more controversial, generally far less effective and less widely adhered to with success.
Evidence has increased that people with diabetes, despite not having clinically detectable atherosclotic disease, have more severe debility from atherosclerotic events over time than even non-diabetics who have already suffered atherosclerotic events. Thus diabetes has been upgraded to be viewed as an advanced atherosclerotic disease equivalent.
Lowering homocysteine levels, including within the normal range and dietary supplements of Omega 3 oils, especially those from the muscle of some deep salt water living fish species, also have clinical evidence of significant protective effects as confirmed by 6 double blind placebo controlled human clinical trials.
Medical treatments often focus predominantly on the symptoms. However, over time, the treatments which focus on decreasing the underlying atherosclerosis processes, as opposed to simply treating the symptoms resulting from the atherosclerosis, have been shown by clinical trials to be more effective.
Other physical treatments, helpful in the short term, include minimally invasive angioplasty procedures to physically expand narrowed arteries and major invasive surgery, such as bypass surgery, to create additional blood supply connections which go around the more severely narrowed areas.
High dose supplements of vitamin E or C, with the goal of improving antioxidant protection, have failed to produce any beneficial trends in human, double blind, clinical research trials. However, these trials have consistently used lower doses than those claimed to be effective and have ignored the short half life of high intakes of vitamin C in the body.
On the other hand, the statins, and some other medications have been shown to have antioxidant effects, possibly part of their basis for some of their therapeutic success in reducing cardiac 'events'.
The success of statin drugs in clinical trials is based on some reductions in mortality rates, however never in women or people over the age of 70 CMAJ. For example, in 4S, the first large placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial of a statin in people with advanced disease who had already suffered a heart attack, the overall mortality rate reduction for those taking the statin, vs. placebo, was 30%. For the subgroup of people in the trial who had Diabetes Mellitus, the mortality rate reduction between statin and placebo was 54%. 4S was a 5.4 year trial which started in 1989 and was published in 1995 after completion. There were 3 more dead women at trial's end on statin than in the group on placebo drug. The |ASTEROID trial, mentioned above and in reference 3, has been the first to show actual disease volume regression (see page 8 of the paper which shows cross-sectional areas of the total heart artery wall at start and 2 years of rosuvastatin 40 mg/day treatment); however, its design was not able to "prove" the mortality reduction issue since it has no placebo group.
In summary, the key to the more effective approaches has been better understanding of the widespread and insidious nature of the disease and to combine multiple different treatment strategies, not rely on just one or a few approaches. Additionally, for those approaches, such as lipoprotein transport behaviors, which have been shown to produce the most success, adopting more aggressive combination treatment strategies has generally produced better results, both before and especially after people are symptomatic. However, treating asymptomatic people remains controversial in the medical community.
Patients at risk for atherosclerosis-related diseases are increasingly being treated prophylactically with low-dose aspirin and a statin. The high incidence of cardiovascular disease led Wald and Law[2] to propose a Polypill, a once-daily pill containing these two types of drugs in addition to an ACE inhibitor, diuretic and beta blocker and folic acid. They maintain that high uptake by the general population by such a Polypill would reduce cardiovascular mortality by 80%. It must be emphasized however that this is purely theoretical, as the Polypill has never been tested in a clinical trial.