Lyme disease primary prevention

Revision as of 23:00, 3 February 2013 by Prashanthsaddala (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lyme disease Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology and Demographics

Causes

Differentiating Lyme disease from other Diseases

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

ECG

X-ray

CT scan

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Sudies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Lyme disease primary prevention On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Lyme disease primary prevention

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Lyme disease primary prevention

CDC on Lyme disease primary prevention

Lyme disease primary prevention in the news

Blogs on Lyme disease primary prevention

Directions to Hospitals Treating Lyme disease

Risk calculators and risk factors for Lyme disease primary prevention

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Vaccination

A vaccine, called Lymerix, against a North American strain of the spirochetal bacteria was available from 1998 to 2002. It was produced by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and was based on the outer surface protein A (Osp-A) of Borrelia. Osp-A causes the human immune system to create antibodies that attack that protein. When taking it off the market, GSK cited poor sales, need for frequent boosters, the high price of the vaccine, and exclusion of children. Some people believe that the actual reason was that the vaccine was neither safe nor effective. A group of patients who took Lymerix developed arthritis, muscle pain and other troubling symptoms after vaccination. Class-action litigation against GSK followed. Cassidy v. SmithKline Beecham, No. 99-10423 (Ct. Common Pleas, PA state court) (common settlement case).[1]

It was later learned that patients with the genetic allele HLA-DR4 were susceptible to T-cell cross-reactivity between epitopes of OspA and lymphocyte function-associated antigen in these patients causing an autoimmune reaction.[2]

New vaccines are being researched using outer surface protein C (Osp-C) and glycolipoprotein as methods of immunization.[3][4]

References

  1. Safety/Efficacy concerns re: Lyme vaccine: LYMErix Controversy LymeInfo.net
  2. Willett TA, Meyer AL, Brown EL, Huber BT (2004). "An effective second-generation outer surface protein A-derived Lyme vaccine that eliminates a potentially autoreactive T cell epitope". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (5): 1303–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0305680101. PMID 14742868.
  3. Earnhart CG, Marconi RT (2007). "OspC phylogenetic analyses support the feasibility of a broadly protective polyvalent chimeric Lyme disease vaccine". Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 14 (5): 628–34. doi:10.1128/CVI.00409-06. PMID 17360854.
  4. Pozsgay V, Kubler-Kielb J (2007). "Synthesis of an experimental glycolipoprotein vaccine against Lyme disease". Carbohydr. Res. 342 (3–4): 621–6. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2006.11.014. PMID 17182019.


Template:WikiDoc Sources