Bone or cartilage mass imaging

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bone or Cartilage Mass Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Classification

Causes

Differential Diagnosis

Epidemiology and Demographics

Screening

Diagnosis

Evaluation of Bone or Cartilage Mass

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Studies

Imaging

Biopsy

Other Diagnostic Studies

Case Studies

Case #1

Bone or cartilage mass imaging On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Bone or cartilage mass imaging

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Bone or cartilage mass imaging

CDC on Bone or cartilage mass imaging

Bone or cartilage mass imaging in the news

Blogs on Bone or cartilage mass imaging

Directions to Hospitals Treating bone or soft tissue mass

Risk calculators and risk factors for Bone or cartilage mass imaging

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Maria Fernanda Villarreal, M.D. [2]

Overview

Conventional radiography is the method of choice for the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors. The evaluation of bone and cartilage tumors will depend on 7 characteristics: periosteal reaction, opacity and mineralization, location, size, margins, cortical involvement, and soft-tissue component.[1]

Imaging

Plain Radiograph

Conventional radiography is the method of choice for the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors. The evaluation of bone and cartilage tumors will depend on 7 characteristics: location, margins, opacity and mineralization, size, periosteal reaction, cortical involvement, and soft-tissue component.[1]


 
 
 
 
 
Plain Radiograph
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What type of bone is involved?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long bone
 
 
 
Flat bone
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Where is the lesion located?
❑ Epiphysis
❑ Diaphysis
❑ Metaphysis
❑ Apophysis
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What is the pattern involved?
❑ Osteoblastic
❑ Osteolytic
❑ Mixed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What is the transversal location?
❑ Medullary
❑ Cortical
❑ Juxtacortical
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What type of margin is involved?
❑ Well defined
❑ Ill-defined
❑ Sclerotic
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Is there a periosteal reaction?
❑ Yes
❑ No
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
What is the size?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Likely benign?
 
 
 
Likely malignant?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Location

  • Bone and cartilage tumors can be divided by location into 3 different categories, such as:
  • Location in relation to the skeleton
  • Location in relation to the physis (long bones)
  • Location in relation to the transverse bone

Bone and cartilage tumors location by different parts of the skeleton, include:

  • Axial skeleton
  • Appendicular skeleton
  • Long bones
  • Flat bones

Bone and cartilage tumors location in relation to the physis, include:

Bone and cartilage tumors location in relation to the transverse bone, include:

  • Medullary
  • Cortical
  • Juxtacortical

Margin

The margin evaluation of bone and cartilage tumors, is divided into 3 categories:

  • Transition zone
  • Narrow
  • Wide
  • Margin characteristics
  • Well-defined
  • Ill-defined
  • Sclerotic
  • Patterns of bone destruction (appearance)
  • Moth-eaten (myeloma, metastases, Ewing's sarcoma)
  • Geographic (non-ossifying fibroma, chondromyxoid fibroma, and eosinophilic granuloma)
  • Permeated (round cell lesions)

Opacity and mineralization

  • Bone and cartilage tumors opacity depends on the stimulation of osteoclasts or osteoblasts in the bone
  • Bone and cartilage tumors can be characterized by the tumor opacity into 3 different categories, including:
  • Lytic lesions
  • Sclerotic lesions
  • Mixed lesions
  • Bone and cartilage tumors can be characterized by 2 patterns of mineralization:
  • Osseous
  • Fluffy
  • Cloud-like
  • Chondral
  • Punctate
  • Flocculent
  • Arclike

Periosteal reaction

  • Periosteal reaction is a non-specific radiographic feature, that occurs with periosteal irritation
  • Periosteal reactions may be broadly characterized by pattern and tumor nature (benign/aggressive)
  • Useful to characterize a bone lesion
  • Common periosteal reactions, include:
  • Single layer
  • Multilayered (onion-skin)
  • Solid
  • Spiculated
  • Perpendicular (hair-on-end)
  • Divergent (sunburst)
  • Sloping (velvet)
  • Disorganised/complex
  • Codman triangle

Size

  • In some cases, bone tumor size may be helpful to establish the diagnosis (eg. osteoblastoma (>1.5 cm) vs osteoid osteoma (<1.5 cm))
  • Size can range from 0.1 cm - 10 cm
  • In general, large size tumors are more likely to be malignant, whereas small size tumors tend to be related with benign origin.

Cortical involvement

  • In some cases, bone and cartilage tumors lesions can specifically arise within the cortex, in such cases the evaluation will depend on:
  • Type of erosion
  • Endosteal scalloping
  • "Soap bubble” lesions

Soft-tissue component

  • Involvement of the soft-tissue is suggestive of a malignant process.

CT

  • Bone CT scan may be helpful in the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors
  • The majority of bone and cartilage tumors require further evaluation with CT scan
  • Features of bone CT scan, include:[2]
  • Characterization of sclerotic or mixed (lytic/sclerotic) lesions
  • Imaging method of choice for follow-up of malignant tumors
  • Characterization of occult bone destruction

MRI

  • Musculoskeletal MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors, common features include:[3]
  • Evaluation of the local extent of a malignant process
  • Useful for tumor staging
  • Evaluation of soft tissue extension
  • Extension within the bone marrow compartment and tumoral tissue infiltration
  • Soft-tissue edema
  • Narrow the differential diagnosis of bone and cartilage tumors, especially when there are signs of aggressiveness
  • Contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal MRI can help demonstrate vascularized parts of the tumor
  • Useful evaluating lesions involving the cortical or medullary region, and determine whether they penetrate or invade the region
  • Useful to assess the response of chemotherapy in malignant bone tumors
  • The use of FS/STIR sequences may be helpful to confirm the presence or absence of fat in a lesion (useful to differentiate hemangioma from lipoma)

Gallery

Plain Radiograph

CT

MRI

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Miller TT (2008). "Bone tumors and tumorlike conditions: analysis with conventional radiography". Radiology. 246 (3): 662–74. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463061038. PMID 18223119.
  2. American College of Radiology (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Follow-up of Malignant or Aggressive Musculoskeletal Tumors. Available via http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/FollowupMalignantOrAggressiveMusculoskeletalTumors.pdf.
  3. Nascimento D, Suchard G, Hatem M, de Abreu A (2014). "The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tumours and tumour-like lesions". Insights Imaging. 5 (4): 419–40. doi:10.1007/s13244-014-0339-z. PMC 4141345. PMID 25005774.


Template:WikiDoc Sources