Leprosy other diagnostic studies

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Leprosy Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Leprosy from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Tertiary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Leprosy other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Leprosy other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Leprosy other diagnostic studies

CDC on Leprosy other diagnostic studies

Leprosy other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Leprosy other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Leprosy

Risk calculators and risk factors for Leprosy other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: João André Alves Silva, M.D. [2]

Overview

Although there are no laboratory studies to help in the diagnosis of leprosy, other studies such as biopsy of skin lesions and skin smear tests have an important contribution for the diagnosis of leprosy in patients, whose diagnosis is suspected from the clinical presentation.

Other Diagnostic Studies

Smear test

May be obtained from any skin lesion, from the nasal mucosa and/or the ear lobe. This test has a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 100%. After collection of the [Laboratory specimen|specimen]], in order to visualize the bacteria, the Ziehl-Neelsen stain should be used. According to the Global Initiative from the WHO, in countries where leprosy is endemic, the diagnosis should be made based on the clinical signs and the results of the smear test, despite the availability of more sophisticated tests, such as serology tests.[1][2][3][4]

Skin Biopsy

A biopsy of the skin lesion should be performed and stained according to the Fite-Faraco technique (a especially designed protocol for staining the leprosy bacilli). According to the pole of leprosy in that patient, typical findings include:[1]

  • Tuberculoid pole:
  • Common nerve involvement.
  • Lepromatous pole:

Lepromin Test

Although not a diagnostic test, the lepromin skin test is used to classify and determine the prognosis of the condition. For this test it is used the inactivated form of Mycobacterium leprae, extracted from lepromas, as follows:[1]

1. Early reaction (Fernandez reaction):
2. Later reaction (Mitsuda reaction):

Serology

The serology test using the PGL-1 antibody titer (Phenolic Glycolipid 1) is a useful diagnostic tool, particularly for multibacillary cases. However, it is not a good test for paucibacillary cases.[1][5][6][7]

Polymerase Chain Reaction

The detection of the bacillus with PCR has high sensitivity and specificity, however, it is a very expensive procedure, which limits its use, particularly in developing countries with very little resources and infrastructures.[1]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Eichelmann, K.; González González, S.E.; Salas-Alanis, J.C.; Ocampo-Candiani, J. (2013). "Leprosy. An Update: Definition, Pathogenesis, Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment". Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition). 104 (7): 554–563. doi:10.1016/j.adengl.2012.03.028. ISSN 1578-2190.
  2. Hatta M, van Beers SM, Madjid B, Djumadi A, de Wit MY, Klatser PR (1995). "Distribution and persistence of Mycobacterium leprae nasal carriage among a population in which leprosy is endemic in Indonesia". Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 89 (4): 381–5. PMID 7570870.
  3. Aggarwal A, Pandey A (2010). "Inverse sampling to study disease burden of leprosy". Indian J Med Res. 132: 438–41. PMID 20966523.
  4. Ramaprasad P, Fernando A, Madhale S, Rao JR, Edward VK, Samson PD; et al. (1997). "Transmission and protection in leprosy: indications of the role of mucosal immunity". Lepr Rev. 68 (4): 301–15. PMID 9503866.
  5. Silva EA, Iyer A, Ura S, Lauris JR, Naafs B, Das PK; et al. (2007). "Utility of measuring serum levels of anti-PGL-I antibody, neopterin and C-reactive protein in monitoring leprosy patients during multi-drug treatment and reactions". Trop Med Int Health. 12 (12): 1450–8. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01951.x. PMID 18076551.
  6. Banerjee S, Sarkar K, Gupta S, Mahapatra PS, Gupta S, Guha S; et al. (2010). "Multiplex PCR technique could be an alternative approach for early detection of leprosy among close contacts--a pilot study from India". BMC Infect Dis. 10: 252. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-252. PMC 2942881. PMID 20735843.
  7. Martins AC, Miranda A, Oliveira ML, Bührer-Sékula S, Martinez A (2010). "Nasal mucosa study of leprosy contacts with positive serology for the phenolic glycolipid 1 antigen". Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 76 (5): 579–87. PMID 20963340.


Template:WikiDoc Sources