HDL laboratory test: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


==Overview==
==Overview==
The association between [[HDL]] levels and cardiovascular outcomes, especially in statin treated high risk patient with residual cardiovascular risks, has triggered a large interest in conducting trials for the evaluation of [[HDL]] lowering drugs.  [[HDL]] is one of the most complicated and heterogeneous among the different lipoproteins as [[HDL]] subfractions can largely vary in function, structure, size, cholesterol and triglyceride contents.  The widely used method of measurement of [[HDL]] is through the chemical measurement of HDL-cholesterol ( HDL-c); however, recent evidence suggest that HDL-c might not be the best method to quantify [[HDL]] and study its relationship with cardiovascular outcomes in statin treated patients. Newer studies postulate that HAL-particles (HDL-p) might be a better measure for [[HDL]]'s effect on residual cardiovascular risks.


==HDL Measures==
==HDL Measures==

Revision as of 19:22, 19 September 2013

High Density Lipoprotein Microchapters

Home

Patient information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Physiology

Pathophysiology

Causes

Low HDL
High HDL

Epidemiology and Demographics

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

HDL Laboratory Test

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Future or Investigational Therapies

Clinical Trials

Landmark Trials

List of All Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

HDL laboratory test On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of HDL laboratory test

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on HDL laboratory test

CDC on HDL laboratory test

HDL laboratory test in the news

Blogs on HDL laboratory test

Directions to Hospitals Treating High density lipoprotein

Risk calculators and risk factors for HDL laboratory test

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Rim Halaby, M.D. [2]

Overview

The association between HDL levels and cardiovascular outcomes, especially in statin treated high risk patient with residual cardiovascular risks, has triggered a large interest in conducting trials for the evaluation of HDL lowering drugs. HDL is one of the most complicated and heterogeneous among the different lipoproteins as HDL subfractions can largely vary in function, structure, size, cholesterol and triglyceride contents. The widely used method of measurement of HDL is through the chemical measurement of HDL-cholesterol ( HDL-c); however, recent evidence suggest that HDL-c might not be the best method to quantify HDL and study its relationship with cardiovascular outcomes in statin treated patients. Newer studies postulate that HAL-particles (HDL-p) might be a better measure for HDL's effect on residual cardiovascular risks.

HDL Measures

HDL Measurement Modalities

Chemical Measurements

Chemical measurements can be used to estimate HDL concentrations present in a blood sample, though such measurements may not indicate how well the HDL particles are functioning to reverse transport cholesterol from tissues. HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) is measured by first removing LDL particles by aggregation or precipitation with divalent ions (such as Mg++) and then coupling the products of a cholesterol oxidase reaction to an indicator reaction. The measurement of apo-A reactive capacity can be used to measure HDL cholesterol but is thought to be less accurate.

Electrophoresis Measurements

Since the HDL particles have a net negative charge and vary by size, electrophoresis measurements have been utilized since the 1960s to both indicate the number of HDL particles and additionally sort them by size. Larger HDL particles are carrying more cholesterol.

NMR Measurements

The newest methodology for measuring HDL particles, available clinically since the late 1990s uses nuclear magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the particles to measure both concentration and sizes. This methodology was pioneered by researcher Jim Otvos and the North Carolina State University academic research spinoff company and dramatically reduced the cost of HDL measurements.

References