Chronic stable angina historical perspective: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


==Overview==
==Overview==
Although this form of heart related pain was not systematically described until the latter part of the 18th century, [[Lucius Annaeus Seneca]] first described his own sufferings as "to have any other malady is to be sick; to have this is to be dying" in the 4th century B.C.. Indeed, the term angina derives from the [[Greek language|Greek]] ''ankhon'' ("strangling") and the [[Latin]] ''pectus'' ("chest"), and can therefore be translated as "a strangling feeling in the chest". The Italian anatomist [[Giovanni Battista Morgagni]] gave a clear description of a paroxysm of angina in a case of aortic aneurysm in 1707.
Chronic stable angina is a form of chest pain classified by lack of blood flow to the myocardium of the heart ([[ischemia]]). The term angina was originally derived from the Greek word ''ankhon'' and the Latin word ''pectus'', which when combined, loosely translates as “a strangling feeling in the chest.” Attempts to classify this disease state began as early as the 4th century B.C., when [[Lucius Annaeus Seneca]] first described the symptoms he was experiencing as “to have any other malady is to be sick; to have this is to be dying.” Throughout history many renowned researchers and health care professionals have contributed to the understanding, definition, and recognition of angina.  


The names of [[John Hunter]], [[Edward Jenner]] and Caleb Hillier Parry are also intimately associated with definition and recognition angina in its early history. [[John Hunter]] suffered from angina himslef, and ultimately died during an anginal attack. [[Edward Jenner]] pointed out a definitive connection between sclerosis of the coronary arteries and [[angina pectoris]] in 1799. Although Caleb Hillier Parry recognized the connection of angina with heart disease, he considered the attacks due to paralysis of the heart and named it as "syncope anginosa".
Circa 1707, the Italian anatomist [[Giovanni Battista Morgagni]] attempted to describe an episode angina that preceded the onset of an aortic aneurysm. Later, [[John Hunter]], [[Edward Jenner]] and [[Caleb Hillier Parry]] also became influential contributors to the clinical definition and diagnosis of angina. [[John Hunter]], a well known Scottish surgeon, personally suffered from angina, and subsequently died due to [[myocardial infarction]]. Shortly after, in 1799, [[Edward Jenner]] became the first physician to identify a correlation between the existence of coronary arterial sclerosis and the presence of [[angina pectoris]]. Jenner was not the only one aware of this correlation; Caleb Hillier Parry also recognized the association between cardiovascular disease and the presence of angina. However, unlike Jenner, he attributed an attack of angina to a temporary paralysis of the heart and coined the term “syncope anginosa.


In 1768, [[William Heberden]] presented a classic description of angina pectoris based upon his more than 40 years clinical experience 'in the chambers of the sick' in a lecture at the [[Royal College of Physicians]]. His notes were published first in 1772.  The French physician Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny wrote a letter which also contained the description of angina in a patient who subsequently died in February 1768 (4 months earlier than Heberden’s letter). In recent years a debate arose between French and English physicians regarding who first described angina. In 1970, this subject was reviewed in detail by Evan Bedford. He reported that Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny did not describe the same syndrome as [[William Heberden]] which was effort angina.  Perhaps Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny was describing unstable angina in so far as the patient died.
In 1768, [[William Heberden]] presented a classic description of angina pectoris based upon his more than 40 years clinical experience 'in the chambers of the sick' in a lecture at the [[Royal College of Physicians]]. His notes were published first in 1772.  The French physician Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny wrote a letter which also contained the description of angina in a patient who subsequently died in February 1768 (4 months earlier than Heberden’s letter). In recent years a debate arose between French and English physicians regarding who first described angina. In 1970, this subject was reviewed in detail by Evan Bedford. He reported that Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny did not describe the same syndrome as [[William Heberden]] which was effort angina.  Perhaps Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny was describing unstable angina in so far as the patient died.

Revision as of 20:53, 20 July 2011

Chronic stable angina Microchapters

Acute Coronary Syndrome Main Page

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Classic
Chronic Stable Angina
Atypical
Walk through Angina
Mixed Angina
Nocturnal Angina
Postprandial Angina
Cardiac Syndrome X
Vasospastic Angina

Differentiating Chronic Stable Angina from Acute Coronary Syndromes

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Stratification

Pretest Probability of CAD in a Patient with Angina

Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Test Selection Guideline for the Individual Basis

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Exercise ECG

Chest X Ray

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Pharmacologic Stress

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy with Thallium

Echocardiography

Exercise Echocardiography

Computed coronary tomography angiography(CCTA)

Positron Emission Tomography

Ambulatory ST Segment Monitoring

Electron Beam Tomography

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Coronary Angiography

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Revascularization

PCI
CABG
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Alternative Therapies for Refractory Angina

Transmyocardial Revascularization (TMR)
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)
Enhanced External Counter Pulsation (EECP)
ACC/AHA Guidelines for Alternative Therapies in patients with Refractory Angina

Discharge Care

Patient Follow-Up
Rehabilitation

Secondary Prevention

Guidelines for Asymptomatic Patients

Noninvasive Testing in Asymptomatic Patients
Risk Stratification by Coronary Angiography
Pharmacotherapy to Prevent MI and Death in Asymptomatic Patients

Landmark Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

Chronic stable angina historical perspective On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Chronic stable angina historical perspective

CDC onChronic stable angina historical perspective

Chronic stable angina historical perspective in the news

Blogs on Chronic stable angina historical perspective

to Hospitals Treating Chronic stable angina historical perspective

Risk calculators and risk factors for Chronic stable angina historical perspective

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]

Overview

Chronic stable angina is a form of chest pain classified by lack of blood flow to the myocardium of the heart (ischemia). The term angina was originally derived from the Greek word ankhon and the Latin word pectus, which when combined, loosely translates as “a strangling feeling in the chest.” Attempts to classify this disease state began as early as the 4th century B.C., when Lucius Annaeus Seneca first described the symptoms he was experiencing as “to have any other malady is to be sick; to have this is to be dying.” Throughout history many renowned researchers and health care professionals have contributed to the understanding, definition, and recognition of angina.

Circa 1707, the Italian anatomist Giovanni Battista Morgagni attempted to describe an episode angina that preceded the onset of an aortic aneurysm. Later, John Hunter, Edward Jenner and Caleb Hillier Parry also became influential contributors to the clinical definition and diagnosis of angina. John Hunter, a well known Scottish surgeon, personally suffered from angina, and subsequently died due to myocardial infarction. Shortly after, in 1799, Edward Jenner became the first physician to identify a correlation between the existence of coronary arterial sclerosis and the presence of angina pectoris. Jenner was not the only one aware of this correlation; Caleb Hillier Parry also recognized the association between cardiovascular disease and the presence of angina. However, unlike Jenner, he attributed an attack of angina to a temporary paralysis of the heart and coined the term “syncope anginosa.”

In 1768, William Heberden presented a classic description of angina pectoris based upon his more than 40 years clinical experience 'in the chambers of the sick' in a lecture at the Royal College of Physicians. His notes were published first in 1772. The French physician Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny wrote a letter which also contained the description of angina in a patient who subsequently died in February 1768 (4 months earlier than Heberden’s letter). In recent years a debate arose between French and English physicians regarding who first described angina. In 1970, this subject was reviewed in detail by Evan Bedford. He reported that Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny did not describe the same syndrome as William Heberden which was effort angina. Perhaps Nicolas François Rougnon de Magny was describing unstable angina in so far as the patient died.

This classic description by William Heberden (based upon his study of hundred cases) was translated from the Latin and published with minor changes in 1802 a year after his death by his son (also named William Heberden). The description was published in the book Commentaries on the History and Cure of Diseases in a chapter entitled "Pectoris Dolor = Disorder of the breast". In its concise brevity this account of a “hitherto unrecognized malady” has never been bettered. The following paragraphs and quotations are taken from different parts of the original lecture notes[1]:

"There is a disorder of the breast, marked with strong and peculiar symptoms, considerable for the kind of danger belonging to it, and extremely rare, of which I do not recollect any mention among medical authors. The seat of it, and sense of strangling and anxiety, with which it is attended, may make it not improperly be called angina pectoris. Those who are afflicted with it are seized, while they are walking and more particularly when they walk soon after eating, with a painful and most disagreeable sensation in the breast, which seems as if it would take their life away, if it were to increase or to continue: the moment they stand still all this uneasiness vanishes”.


“After it has continued some months, it will not cease so instantaneous upon standing still; and it will come on, not only when the persons are walking, but when they are lying down, and oblige them to rise up from their beds every night for many months together; and in one or two very inveterate cases it has been brought on by the motion of a horse or a carriage, and even by swallowing, coughing, going to stool or speaking, or by any disturbance of mind”.


“But all the rest, whom I have seen, who are at least twenty, were men, and almost all above 50 years old, and most of them with a short neck, and inclining to be fat. When a fit of this sort comes on by walking, its duration is very short, as it goes off almost immediately upon stopping. If it comes on in the night, it will last an hour or two; and I have met one, in whom it once continued for several days, during all which time the patient seemed to be in imminent danger of death”.


“But the natural tendency of this illness be to kill the patients suddenly, yet unless it have a power of preserving a person from all other ails, it will easily be believed that some of those, who are afflicted with it, may die in a different manner, since this disorder will last, as I have known it more than once, near twenty years, and most usually attacks only those who are above fifty years of age. I have accordingly observed one, who sunk under a lingering illness of a different nature”.


“The os sterni is usually pointed to as the seat of this malady, but it seems sometimes as if it was under the lower part of it, and at other times under the middle or upper part, but always inclining more to the left side, and sometimes there is with it a pain about the middle of the left arm”.

Later on, the syndrome of angina pectoris was described as rare in textbooks of medicine by Austin Flint in 1866 and by William Osler in 1892. Paul Dudley White wrote: "angina pectoris was uncommon in my early professional years. But when the automobile came in the 1920s and the population became more prosperous and over nourished, the current epidemic of coronary heart disease, as shown mainly by the symptom angina pectoris, began and incidentally involved younger and younger men".

References

  1. Fuster, O'Rourke, Walsh. Hurst's the heart. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing, 2008


Template:WikiDoc Sources