Pericarditis CT: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
{{CMG}}
{{CMG}}


==Computed Tomography (CT) in Pericarditis <small><ref>Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE (1999) Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595-599</ref>  <ref>Ohnesorge BM, Becker CR, Flohr TG, Reiser MF (2001) Multislice CT in cardiac imaging. Springer-Verlag</ref> </small>==
==Computed Tomography of the Normal Pericardium==
There is normally 15 to 50 mL of fluid in the pericardial sac which may contribute to the apparent thickness of the pericardium, and should be considered normal.


'''Pericardial Effusion'''
==Computed Tomography in the Patient with Pericardial Effusion==
If the fluid is free-flowing and not loculated, it will first accumulate at the posterior lateral aspect of the left ventricle in the supine position. It can be hard to differentiate a small pericardial effusion from pericardial thickening of about 4 mm Since both entities generate a similar signal.  In the presence of acute pericarditis, the pericardium can generate an intermediate signal intensity and may enhance after gadolinium administration.


Cross-sectional imaging by CT or MRI is very sensitive in the detection of generalized or loculated pericardial effusions. Some fluid in the pericardial sac contributes to the apparent thickness and should be considered normal. Commonly, free-flowing fluid accumulates first at the posterolateral aspect of the left ventricle, when the patient is imaged in the supine position.  
Estimation of the amount of fluid is possible to a limited extent based on the overall thickness of the crescent of fluid. Hemorrhagic effusions can be differentiated from a transudate or an exudate based on signal characteristics (high signal on T1-weighted images) or density (high-density clot on CT). Pulsation artefacts may cause local areas of low signal in a hemorrhagic effusion.


Estimation of the amount of fluid is possible to a limited extent based on the overall thickness of the crescent of fluid. Compared to cardiac ultrasound, CT and MRI may be particularly helpful in detecting loculated effusions, owing to the wide field of view provided by these techniques. Hemorrhagic effusions can be differentiated from a transudate or an exudate based on signal characteristics (high signal on T1-weighted images) or density (high-density clot on CT). Pulsation artefacts may cause local areas of low signal in a hemorrhagic effusion. Effusions are often incidentally noted on CT scans obtained for other indications.  
==Pericardial Effusion as an Incidentoloma on Computed Tomography ==
A pericardial effusion is often incidentally noted on CT scans obtained for other indications.


Pericardial thickening (thickness >4 mm) is difficult to differentiate from a small generalized effusion. Both entities will reveal a low signal/density line that is thicker than the normal pericardial thickness. In acute pericarditis, the pericardial lining can show intermediate signal intensity and may enhance after gadolinium administration.  
==Advantages of Computed Tomography Over Echocardiography in the Assessment of Pericardial Effusion==
Both MRI and CT have an advantage over echocardiography insofar as they can detect loculated effusions as well as generalized effusions<small><ref>Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE (1999) Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595-599</ref>  <ref>Ohnesorge BM, Becker CR, Flohr TG, Reiser MF (2001) Multislice CT in cardiac imaging. Springer-Verlag</ref>. Computed tomography superior to MRI in the assessment of pericardial calcification.


[http://www.radswiki.net Images courtesy of RadsWiki]
[http://www.radswiki.net Images courtesy of RadsWiki]

Revision as of 19:04, 17 July 2011

Pericarditis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

HIV
Post MI
Dressler's syndrome
Post-pericardiotomy
Radiation
Tuberculosis
Uremia
Malignancy

Differentiating Pericarditis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Pericardial Effusion
Cardiac Tamponade
Constrictive Pericarditis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Pericardiocentesis
Pericardial Window
Pericardial Stripping

Treatment Related Videos

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Pericarditis CT On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Google Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Pericarditis CT

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pericarditis CT

CDC on Pericarditis CT

Pericarditis CT in the news

Blogs on Pericarditis CT

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pericarditis CT

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Computed Tomography of the Normal Pericardium

There is normally 15 to 50 mL of fluid in the pericardial sac which may contribute to the apparent thickness of the pericardium, and should be considered normal.

Computed Tomography in the Patient with Pericardial Effusion

If the fluid is free-flowing and not loculated, it will first accumulate at the posterior lateral aspect of the left ventricle in the supine position. It can be hard to differentiate a small pericardial effusion from pericardial thickening of about 4 mm Since both entities generate a similar signal. In the presence of acute pericarditis, the pericardium can generate an intermediate signal intensity and may enhance after gadolinium administration.

Estimation of the amount of fluid is possible to a limited extent based on the overall thickness of the crescent of fluid. Hemorrhagic effusions can be differentiated from a transudate or an exudate based on signal characteristics (high signal on T1-weighted images) or density (high-density clot on CT). Pulsation artefacts may cause local areas of low signal in a hemorrhagic effusion.

Pericardial Effusion as an Incidentoloma on Computed Tomography

A pericardial effusion is often incidentally noted on CT scans obtained for other indications.

Advantages of Computed Tomography Over Echocardiography in the Assessment of Pericardial Effusion

Both MRI and CT have an advantage over echocardiography insofar as they can detect loculated effusions as well as generalized effusions[1] [2]. Computed tomography superior to MRI in the assessment of pericardial calcification.

Images courtesy of RadsWiki

Cardiac MSCT: Pericardial effusion


Constrictive Pericarditis

Pericardial thickening may result in constrictive pericarditis. In this entity, pericardial thickening will hamper cardiac function, with hemodynamic consequences. Many disease conditions can lead to constrictive pericarditis (infection, tumor, radiation, heart surgery, etc.).

The diagnostic features include thickened pericardium in conjunction with signs of impaired right ventricular function: dilatation of caval veins and hepatic veins, enlargement of the right atrium, and the right ventricle itself may be normal or even reduced (tubular, sigmoid) in size due to compression. Localized pericardial thickening may also cause functional impairment (localized constrictive pericarditis). Sometimes constriction may occur despite a normal appearance of the pericardium.

Pericardial calcifications are easily visualized by CT but may be difficult or impossible to appreciate on MRI.

Pericardial Tumor

A pericardial cyst is most commonly located at the right cardiophrenic angle. On T1, it appears either as a low signal or an intermediate signal due to high protein content, or with a characteristic light-bulb appearance on T2.

Unusual tumors may arise from the pericardium (mesothelioma, angiosarcoma, etc.). Malignant primary tumors have many overlapping imaging features and generally cannot be differentiated. The role of cross-sectional imaging is to establish a diagnosis and to define the extent of the lesion (invasion of cardiac structures, veins, pericardium, etc.). Sometimes lesions may have helpful signal characteristics to suggest a specific diagnosis, e.g., high-signal fat on T1 or low-density fat on CT in lipoma / liposarcoma.

Secondary tumors are much more common than primary tumors. Lung cancer may invade the mediastinal and cardiac structures directly or indirectly.

The most common secondary tumors affecting the heart are lung cancer, breast cancer, and lymphoma. Metastatic pericardial disease commonly presents as hemorrhagic effusion. Tumor nodules may enhance after intravenous gadolinium administration.

Pericardial Metastases

Image courtesy of Professor Peter Anderson DVM PhD and published with permission © PEIR, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Pathology

Pericardial Metastases


Pericardial Metastases


Pericardial Metastases


Pericardial Metastases


Pericardial Metastases


Pericardial Metastases


References

  1. Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE (1999) Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology 210:595-599
  2. Ohnesorge BM, Becker CR, Flohr TG, Reiser MF (2001) Multislice CT in cardiac imaging. Springer-Verlag

Template:WH Template:WS