Standardized Kt/V
WikiDoc Resources for Standardized Kt/V 
Articles 

Most recent articles on Standardized Kt/V Most cited articles on Standardized Kt/V 
Media 
Powerpoint slides on Standardized Kt/V 
Evidence Based Medicine 
Cochrane Collaboration on Standardized Kt/V 
Clinical Trials 
Ongoing Trials on Standardized Kt/V at Clinical Trials.gov Trial results on Standardized Kt/V Clinical Trials on Standardized Kt/V at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt 
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Standardized Kt/V NICE Guidance on Standardized Kt/V

Books 
News 
Commentary 
Definitions 
Patient Resources / Community 
Patient resources on Standardized Kt/V Discussion groups on Standardized Kt/V Patient Handouts on Standardized Kt/V Directions to Hospitals Treating Standardized Kt/V Risk calculators and risk factors for Standardized Kt/V

Healthcare Provider Resources 
Causes & Risk Factors for Standardized Kt/V 
Continuing Medical Education (CME) 
International 

Business 
Experimental / Informatics 
Standardized Kt/V, also std Kt/V, is a way of measuring (renal) dialysis adequacy. It was developed by Frank Gotch and is used in the USA to measure dialysis. Despite the name, it is quite different from Kt/V. In theory, both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis can be quantified with std Kt/V.
Derivation
Standardized Kt/V is motivated by the steady state solution of the mass transfer equation often used to approximate kidney function (equation 1), which is also used to define clearance.
where
 is the mass generation rate of the substance  assumed to be a constant, i.e. not a function of time (equal to zero for foreign substances/drugs) [mmol/min] or [mol/s]
 t is dialysis time [min] or [s]
 V is the volume of distribution (total body water) [L] or [m^{3}]
 K is the clearance [mL/min] or [m^{3}/s]
 C is the concentration [mmol/L] or [mol/m^{3}] (in the USA often [mg/mL])
From the above definitions it follows that is the first derivative of concentration with respect to time, i.e. the change in concentration with time.
Derivation equation 1 is described in the article clearance (medicine).
The solution of the above differential equation (equation 1) is
where
 C_{o} is the concentration at the beginning of dialysis [mmol/L] or [mol/m^{3}]
 e is the base of the natural logarithm
The steady state solution is
This can be written as
Equation 3b is the equation that defines clearance. It is the motivation for K' (the equivalent clearance):
where
 K' is the equivalent clearance [mL/min] or [m^{3}/s]
 is the mass generation rate of the substance  assumed to be a constant, i.e. not a function of time [mmol/min] or [mol/s]
 C_{o} is the concentration at the beginning of dialysis [mmol/L] or [mol/m^{3}]
Equation 4 is normalized by the volume of distribution to form equation 5:
Equation 5 is multiplied by an arbitrary constant to form equation 6:
Equation 6 is then defined as standardized Kt/V (std Kt/V):
 ^{[1]}^{[2]}
where
 const is 7×24×60×60 seconds, the number of seconds in a week.
Interpretation of std Kt/V
Standardized Kt/V can be interpreted as a concentration normalized by the mass generation per unit volume of body water.
Equation 7 can be written in the following way:
If one takes the inverse of Equation 8 it can be observed that the inverse of std Kt/V is proportional to the concentration of urea (in the body) divided by the production of urea per time per unit volume of body water.
Comparison to Kt/V
Kt/V and standardized Kt/V are not the same. Kt/V is a ratio of the pre and postdialysis urea concentrations. Standardized Kt/V is an equivalent clearance defined by the initial urea concentration (compare equation 8 and equation 10).
Kt/V is defined as (see article on Kt/V for derivation):
 ^{[3]}
Since Kt/V and std Kt/V are defined differently, Kt/V and std Kt/V values cannot be compared.
Advantages of std Kt/V
 Can be used to compare any dialysis schedule (i.e. nocturnal home hemodialysis vs. daily hemodialysis vs. conventional hemodialysis)
 Applicable to peritoneal dialysis.
 Can be applied to patients with residual renal function; it is possible to demonstrate that C_{o} is a function of the residual kidney function and the "cleaning" provided by dialysis.
 The model can be applied to substances other than urea, if the clearance, K, and generation rate of the substance, , are known.^{[2]}
Criticism/disadvantages of std Kt/V
 It is complex and tedious to calculate, although webbased calculators are available to do this fairly easily.
 Many nephrologists have difficulty understanding it.
 Urea is not associated with toxicity.^{[4]}
 Standardized Kt/V only models the clearance of urea and thus implicitly assumes the clearance of urea is comparable to other toxins. It ignores molecules that (relative to urea) have diffusionlimited transport  so called middle molecules.
 It ignores the mass transfer between body compartments and across the plasma membrane (i.e. intracellular to extracellular transport), which has been shown to be important for the clearance of molecules such as phosphate.
 The Standardized Kt/V is based on body water volume (V). The Glomerular filtration rate, an estimate of normal kidney function, is usually normalized to body surface area (S). S and V differ markedly between small vs. large people and between men and women. A man and a woman of the same S will have similar levels of GFR, but their values for V may differ by 1520%. Because standardized Kt/V incorporates residual renal function into the calculations, it makes the assumption that kidney function should scale by V. This may disadvantage women and smaller patients of either sex, in whom V is decreased to a greater extent than S.
Calculating stdKt/V from treatment Kt/V and number of sessions per week
The various ways of computing standardized Kt/V by Gotch ^{[5]}, Leypoldt ^{[6]}, and the FHN trial network ^{[7]} are all a bit different, as assumptions differ on equal spacing of treatments, use of a fixed or variable volume model, and whether or not urea rebound is taken into effect ^{[8]}. One equation, proposed by Leypoldt and modified by Depner that is cited in the KDOQI 2006 Hemodialysis Adequacy Guidelines and which is the basis for a web calculator for stdKt/V is as follows:
where stdKt/V is the standardized Kt/V
spKt/V is the singlepool Kt/V, computed as described in Kt/V section using a simplified equation or ideally, using urea modeling, and
eKt/V is the equilibrated Kt/V, computed from the singlepool Kt/V (spKt/V) and session length (t) using, for example, the Tattersall equation ^{[9]}:
where t is session duration in minutes, and C is a time constant, which is specific for type of access and type solute being removed. For urea, C should be 35 minutes for arterial access and 22 min for a venous access.
The regular "rate equation" ^{[10]} also can be used to determine equilibrated Kt/V from the spKt/V, as long as session length is 120 min or longer.
Nomogram to get stdKt/V from treatment Kt/V with different treatment schedules
One can use a nomogram derived from the above equation to estimate standardized Kt/V for any level of singlepool Kt/V. Because the equations are quite dependent on session length, the numbers will change substantially between two sessions given at the same schedule, but with different session lengths. For the present nomogram, a session length of 0.4 Kt/V units per hour was assumed, with a minimum dialysis session length of 2.0 hours.
[[1]  File:Std ktv.svg]
External Links
 Standardized Kt/V calculator  HDCN
References
 ↑ Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13 Suppl 6:104. PMID 9719197. Full Text.
 ↑ ^{2.0} ^{2.1} Gotch FA, Sargent JA, Keen ML. Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int Suppl. 2000 Aug;76:S318. PMID 10936795.
 ↑ Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int. 1985 Sep;28(3):52634. PMID 3934452.
 ↑ Johnson WJ, Hagge WW, Wagoner RD, Dinapoli RP, Rosevear JW. Effects of urea loading in patients with faradvanced renal failure. Mayo Clin Proc. 1972 Jan;47(1):219. PMID 5008253.
 ↑ Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13 Suppl 6:104. Review. PMID 9719197
 ↑ Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Zimmerman DL. Predicting treatment dose for novel therapies using urea standard Kt/V. Semin Dial. 2004 MarApr;17(2):1425. PMID 15043617
 ↑ Suri RS, Garg AX, Chertow GM, Levin NW, Rocco MV, Greene T, Beck GJ, Gassman JJ, Eggers PW, Star RA, Ornt DB, Kliger AS. Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials: Study design. Kidney Int. 2007 Feb;71(4):34959. Epub 2006 Dec 13. PMID 17164834
 ↑ DiazBuxo JA, Loredo JP. Standard Kt/V: comparison of calculation methods. Artif Organs. 2006 Mar;30(3):17885. Erratum in: Artif Organs. 2006 Jun;30(6):490. PMID: 16480392
 ↑ Tattersall JE, DeTakats D, Chamney P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. The posthemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int. 1996 Dec;50(6):2094102. PMID 8943495
 ↑ Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA, Leypoldt J, Gotch F, Schulman G, Star R; Hemodialysis Study Group. Factors that affect postdialysis rebound in serum urea concentration, including the rate of dialysis: results from the HEMO Study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Jan;15(1):194203. PMID 14694173