Osteomyelitis laboratory findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Osteomyelitis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Osteomyelitis from Other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

X Ray

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Osteomyelitis laboratory findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Osteomyelitis laboratory findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Osteomyelitis laboratory findings

CDC on Osteomyelitis laboratory findings

Osteomyelitis laboratory findings in the news

Blogs on Osteomyelitis laboratory findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Osteomyelitis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Osteomyelitis laboratory findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Nate Michalak, B.A., Seyedmahdi Pahlavani, M.D. [2]

Overview

Laboratory findings in osteomyelitis include increased acute phase reactants (ESR and CRP) levels and leukocytosis.[1] Blood cultures should be performed in all suspected cases. Bone probing and direct sampling is a reliable method, especially in diabetic ulcers which are contaminated with many flora.

Laboratory Findings

Microbiology and histopathology are essential for diagnosis and determining treatment of osteomyelitis.

  • Histopathology of bone biopsy samples typically provides the most accurate diagnosis.
  • Blood cultures are typically more reliable for hematogenous or vertebral osteomyelitis.
  • Samples obtained from swabbing sinus tracts should not be used as the isolate may be contaminated with non-pathogenic microorganisms.

Isolation techniques to determine the causative agent include:

Laboratory tests to determine infection include:[2][3]

References

  1. Pääkkönen M, Kallio MJ, Kallio PE, Peltola H (2010). "Sensitivity of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in childhood bone and joint infections". Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 468 (3): 861–6. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0936-1. PMC 2816763. PMID 19533263.
  2. Unkila-Kallio L, Kallio MJ, Eskola J, Peltola H (1994). "Serum C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood cell count in acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of children". Pediatrics. 93 (1): 59–62. PMID 8265325.
  3. Cavanagh PR, Lipsky BA, Bradbury AW, Botek G (2005). "Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers". Lancet. 366 (9498): 1725–35. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67699-4. PMID 16291067.