Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case studies

Case #1

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings

CDC on Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings in the news

Blogs on Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings

Directions to Hospitals Treating Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Risk calculators and risk factors for Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease other imaging findings

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Parth Vikram Singh, MBBS

Overview

There are no other imaging findings associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by elastography

Vibration-controlled transient elastography is used to noninvasively measure liver stiffness and is commonly used after FIB-4 testing in patients at increased risk for advanced fibrosis. A liver stiffness measurement greater than 8.0 kPa should prompt referral to a hepatologist for further evaluation.

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography [SWE]) can estimate liver stiffness measurements: "LS of 8 and 12.5 kPa represent generally accepted cut-off values for F3 and F4 fibrosis. LS highly correlates with portal pressure, and esophageal varices are likely at values >20 kPa."[1]

  • LS of 8 suggests F3 fibrosis
  • LS of 12.5 kPa suggests F4 fibrosis

A more recent study suggests lower cutoffs[2]:

  • LS of 6 suggests F2 fibrosis
  • LS of 7 suggests F3 fibrosis
  • LS of 11 kPa suggests F4 fibrosis

The FibroScan can measure LSM by SWE

Magnetic resonance elastography

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) may be more accurate than elastography[3]

Hepatic steatosis

Hepattic steatosis can be measured with the Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP).[4][2][5]

The controlled attenuation parameter measures attenuation of ultrasound waves through the liver and is usually performed with vibration-controlled transient elastography. A controlled attenuation parameter value of 248 dB/m or greater is considered diagnostic for hepatic steatosis, and higher values indicate more severe steatosis.

Compared with conventional ultrasonography, controlled attenuation parameter has similar sensitivity and slightly higher specificity, approximately 90%, for detecting hepatic steatosis.

Other imaging

CT scan: "≤ 40 Hounsfield units indicating > 30% hepatic steatosis"[6].

References

  1. Mueller S, Sandrin L (2010). "Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease". Hepat Med. 2: 49–67. doi:10.2147/hmer.s7394. PMC 3846375. PMID 24367208.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Eddowes PJ, Sasso M, Allison M, Tsochatzis E, Anstee QM, Sheridan D; et al. (2019). "Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease". Gastroenterology. 156 (6): 1717–1730. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042. PMID 30689971.
  3. Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z, Miller FH, Motosugi U, Low RN; et al. (2015). "Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data". Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13 (3): 440–451.e6. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.046. PMC 4333001. PMID 25305349.
  4. Petroff D, Blank V, Newsome PN, Voican CS, Thiele M; et al. (2021). "Assessment of hepatic steatosis by controlled attenuation parameter using the M and XL probes: an individual patient data meta-analysis". Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 6 (3): 185–198. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30357-5. PMID 33460567 Check |pmid= value (help).
  5. Tilg H, Petta S, Stefan N, Targher G (January 2026). "Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Adults: A Review". JAMA. 335 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.19615. PMID 41212550 Check |pmid= value (help).
  6. Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named pmid33501527

Template:WS Template:WH