Neuroendocrine tumors classification

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Neuroendocrine tumors Microchapters

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

History and Symptoms

Laboratory Findings

CT scan

PET scan

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [2]

Classification

Human GEP-NETs by Site of Origin and by Symptom

Classification of GEP-NETs by cell characteristics

The diverse and amorphous nature of GEP-NETs has led to a confused, overlapping, and changing terminology. In general, aggressiveness (malignancy), secretion (of hormones), and anaplasia (dissimilarity between tumor cells and normal cells) tend to go together, but there are many exceptions, which have contributed to the confusion in terminology. For example, the term atypical carcinoid is sometimes used to indicate an aggressive tumor without secretions, whether anaplastic or well-differentiated.

In 2000, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised the classification of GEP-NETs, abandoning the term carcinoid in favor of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and abandoning islet cell tumor or pancreatic endocrine tumor for neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Judging from papers published into 2006, the medical community is accepting this new terminology with great sluggishness. (Perhaps one reason for the resistance is that the WHO chose to label the least aggressive subclass of neuroendocrine neoplasm with the term – neuroendocrine tumor – widely used previously either for the superclass or for the generally aggressive noncarcinoid subclass.)

Klöppel et alia have written an overview that clarifies the WHO classification and bridges the gap to the old terminology (Klöppel, Perren, and Heitz 2004). In this article we conform to the old terminology.

Summary of classification by cell characteristics (the WHO classification)

  • Superclass:
    • Öberg, WHO, Klöppel et alia: Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (GEP-NET)
  • Subclass 1 (less malignant)
    • Öberg: Carcinoid
    • WHO: Neuroendocrine tumor (NET)
    • Klöppel et alia: Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (carcinoid)
    • this article: Carcinoid
  • Subclass 2 (more malignant)
    • Öberg: Endocrine pancreatic tumor
    • WHO: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC)
    • Klöppel et alia: Well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (malignant carcinoid)
    • this article: Pancreatic endocrine tumor (PET) or endocrine pancreatic tumor (EPT) or islet cell tumor or noncarcinoid GEP-NET
  • Subclass 3 (most malignant)
    • WHO: Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma
    • Klöppel et alia: Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (high-grade malignant carcinoid)
  • Subclass 4 (mixed)
    • WHO: Mixed endocrine/exocrine tumor
  • Subclass 5 (miscellaneous)
    • WHO: Rare neuroendocrine-like lesions

GEP-NETs are also sometimes called APUDomas, but that term is now considered to be misleading, since it is based on a discredited theory of the development of the tumors. [1]

References

  1. "The APUD concept led to the belief that these cells arise from the embryologic neural crest. This hypothesis eventually was found to be incorrect" (Warner 2005, 2).

    "The APUD-concept is currently abandoned" (Öberg 1998, 2, [1]).

Template:WH Template:WS