D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

D-Dimer Microchapters

Home

Patient information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Physiology

Clinical Correlation

Causes of High D-dimer

Diagnostic Role in Thromboembolism

Prognostic Role in Mortality

Prognostic Role in Thromboembolism Occurence

Prognostic Role in Thromboembolism Recurrence

Prognostic Role in Non-Thromboembolism

Clinical Trials

Landmark Trials

Case #1

D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions

CDC on D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions

D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions in the news

Blogs on D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions

Directions to Hospitals Treating D-dimer

Risk calculators and risk factors for D-dimer prognostic role in non thromboembolism conditions

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

D-dimer lab test can be elevated in conditions other than venous thromboembolism. Because D-dimer is a sensitive test that lacks specificity, it is considered only useful in ruling out DVT and/or PE. Since D-dimer elevation is a physiologic process related to fibrinolytic activity that counteracts the extrinsic coagulation pathway activation, it is understandably not exclusive to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and can be present in other physiologic and pathological processes.[1] D-dimer elevation is not diagnostic of PE and can sometimes be a misleading lab value that is cost-inefficient, predisposes patients to high doses of unnecessary computed tomography (CT) radiation exposure, and delays appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic work-up.[2][3]

D-Dimer and Non Thromboembolism Conditions

Age

D-dimer levels physiologically increase with age, making the usefulness of D-dimer among the elderly less significant. The exact mechanism of D-dimer increase with age is poorly understood. It is thought to be related to the expected increase in patient co-morbidities and thrombotic events that occur with age, and that also happen to elevate D-dimer levels. The use of D-dimer in elderly nonetheless remains helpful in diagnosing VTE in low and intermediate risk patients. Age-adjusted D-dimer levels are thought to be useful, especially for the elderly. However, specific age-adjusted values have not been released yet.[4]

Aortic Dissection

Elevated levels of D-dimer lab test has been used to rapidly rule out emergencies such as acute aortic dissection (AAD). More than 15 studies that enrolled more than 400 patients have evaluated the use of D-dimer in AAD. With the absence of specific biomarkers, the clinical diagnosis of AAD remains a challenge for clinicians based on clinical suspicion alone. A meta analysis for D-dimer testing in AAD revealed that D-dimer has 97% sensitivity and 59% specificity in diagnosis of AAD. The diagnostic cut-off D-dimer value for patients with AAD ranges between 0.1 and 0.9 µg/mL., with sensitivities ranging between 100% and 86% respectively. Using D-dimer cut-off value similar to that for PE at a level of 0.5 µg/mL is considered an appropriate level that has a negative predictive value that approximately reaches 100%.[1]

Atrial Fibrillation

D-dimer levels are also elevated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in those who are known to have established several embolism risk factors.[5] In 2003, Somloi et al. measured D-dimer levels in 73 patients with AF prior to TEE-guided cardioversion; they concluded that although D-dimer is unspecific, D-dimer concentration < 0.06 µg/ml provides a negative predictive value of 98%.[6] Habara et al. concluded that D-dimer concentration of 0.115 µg/mL was an optimal cut-off value to detect left atrial appendange (LAA) thrombus; the NPV was 97% irrespective of co-morbidities, such as congestive heart failure, or stroke.[5] Even in AF patients receiving appropriate Warfarin anticoagulation therapy, D-dimer levels remained abnormally high.[7]

It was further found that AF patients with D-dimer levels > 0.15 µg/mL were at a significantly greater risk of thrombo-embolic events than other patient subgroups. As such, the level 0.15 µg/mL is currently considered an accepted threshold value for increased rate of thrombo-embolic events in patients with AF. Nonetheless, increased number of risk factors bypasses the importance of D-dimer in AF patients and thus, patients with multiple risk factors are at high risk of thrombo-embolic events regardless of D-dimer levels and anticoagulation therapy. As such, D-dimer alone in patients with AF must be coupled to clinical risk factors for adequate assessment of thrombo-embolic risk.[7]

According to Diego et al., elevated D-dimer level is significantly associated with increasing severity of atherosclerosis based on ultrasound detection of carotid plaques and overall cardiovascular decline.[8][9]

Coronary Artery Disease

Since D-dimers alterations reflect thrombus turnover, levels are expected to be increased in ischemic heart disease and coronary angina. D-dimer levels are significantly associated with a 1.5 fold increase in coronary artery disease (CAD) and in subclinical atherosclerosis.[10] In patients with CAD, the median D-dimer value was 0.112 µg/mL vs. only 0.0028 µg/mL in patients without CAD. The positive correlation between D-dimer, fibrinogen, plasma viscosity, and interleukin-6 seem to be of importance in understanding the association of D-dimer with inflammatory products.[11] The most important value that D-dimer carries is its prediction of future cardiac events in various patient age groups, in both genders, and in patients with known peripheral arterial disease and myocardial infarction.[12][13][14][15][16][17] Despite obvious associations, some still question the use of D-dimer in providing informative or additional clinical data in the diagnosis or management of myocardial ischemia.[18]

According to a prospective study and metaanalysis, D-dimers level were found to correlate with CAD with an odds ratio of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.31 to 2.13; P<0.0001).[19] This finding can be explained by the fact that CAD might be associated with activation of the coagulation cascade and increased fibrin turnover.[20]

In a study by Tataru et al. in 2000 that recruited 1112 male and 299 female patients, the significant association between and previous MI was further emphasized.[21]

Liver Disease

Cirrhosis is considered a hypercoagulable state due to altered physiology of hemostasis secondary to the disease due to the physiological role the liver plays in the synthesis of thrombopoietin and coagulation factors,[22] decrease in fibrinolytic inhibitors, and reduced clearance of tissue plasminogen activator.[23] Platelet dysfunction and thrombocytopenia are frequent in liver cirrhosis, along with prolonged prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT).[22] Elevated D-dimer level is seen in more than 75% of patients with advanced liver disease. Significant elevation correlates with worse liver outcomes, as demonstrated by Child-Pugh classification. It demonstrates features of fibrinolysis in these patients when levels are just above 0.2 µg/mL.[24][25] In a study that included 188 patients, D-dimer was considered of high specificity in patients with Child-Pugh class A or B, of cut-off values > 0.56 µg/mL and > 1.18 µg/mL respectively; whereas it was highly sensitive in patients with class C with cut-off value > 0.77 µg/mL with lower specificity in this particular class probably due to patients’ advanced state of liver dysfunction. [26]

D-dimer is suggested to have a prognostic role in liver disease because it was found to be a significant predictor of death.[27]

D-dimer elevation is notably seen in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) regardless of Child-Pugh class, a complication of portal hypertension that affects approximately 0.6-26% of patients with liver cirrhosis in general and approximately 35% of patients with cirrhosis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).[23] In patients with worse outcomes of chronic liver disease Child-Pugh class C, D-dimer level of ≥ 0.55 µg/mL was 100% sensitive to diagnose PVT when measured.[28]

Malignancy

D-dimer is significantly associated with increased incidence of malignancy. The younger patient population, especially under 60 years, seem to be of particular concern for overt or occult cancer forms when D-dimer values are > 4 µg/mL .[29] Data regarding the correlation of malignancy with D-dimer shows that increasing D-dimer values are significantly more associated with malignancy than lower, yet abnormal, values. In patients with D-dimer > 8 µg/mL, the rate of malignancy following an episode of DVT was approximately 50%.[30] Similarly, patients with thrombosis who have low D-dimer values < 1 µg/mL are less likely to have an underlying malignancy.[31]

According to the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS) that evaluated 1178 cancer patients, D-dimer was highest at a median of approximately 1.2 µg/mL in pancreatic cancer, followed by 1.08 µg/mL in gastric cancer, then 0.84 µg/mL in lung cancer, 0.81 µg/mL in colorectal cancers.[32] Significant association was also seen with lower D-dimer values and other malignancies, such as brain cancer (0.66 µg/mL), lymphomas (0.61 µg/mL), prostate cancer (0.46 µg/mL) and finally breast cancers (0.46 µg/mL).[32]

In a different study investigating endothelial, platelet and coagulation factors activation, patients with multiple myeloma undergoing treatment were found to have elevated D-dimers. In fact, 3 out of 4 patients who had elevated D-dimer levels beyond 500 mg/L developed DVT. Hence, D-dimer might play a role in stratifying patients with multiple myeloma who are at high risk of DVT.[33]

Not only is D-dimer associated with the presence of malignancy, but also it correlates with tumor bulk, metastasis, and overall patient prognosis and mortality.[34]

Normal Pregnancy

It is well known that physiological changes in the hypercoagulable state of normal pregnancy include alterations in coagulation and fibrinolysis systems. Pregnant women are at increased risk of VTE, and consumptive coagulopathies, such as DIC. D-dimer levels gradually increase in pregnancy and are believed to reach their peak values on day one post-partum, after which steady decline is observed to reach normal pre-pregnancy values approximately 42 days after delivery.[35] D-dimer surpasses normal range of 0.5 µg/mL in pregnant women starting the first trimester; where 79- 84% of pregnant women have normal D-dimer levels in the first trimester. This percentage declines to reach 22-33% in the second trimester, and only 0-1% in the third trimester. When studying D-dimer levels in 89 healthy pregnant women, Kovac and colleagues proposed in 2010 a new threshold of D-dimer levels for pregnancy to rule out VTE. They suggested D-dimer cut-off values of 0.286 µg/mL, 0.457 µg/mL, and 0.644 µg/mL in pregnant women in their first, second and third trimesters, respectively.[36][37]

Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Elevated D-dimer levels are shown to be associated with idiopathic primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) and correlates with severity of disease, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and survival when evaluated in a small study that included 14 patients.[38][39]

The sensitivity of D-dimer in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is low in comparison to its sensitivity in other utilities. In a study that included 34 patients with CTEPH, the sensitivity of D-dimer in diagnosing CTEPH was only 37%, whereas the specificity was 46%. Hence, it cannot be used to rule in or rule out CTEPH.[38][39]

Renal Disease

D-dimer levels is correlated with nephrotic syndrome and other renal diseases. While some postulate that D-dimer elevation is associated with renal clearance,[40] data is conflicting as to whether D-dimer elevation may be less likely correlated with renal clearance as much as it is associated with proteinuria.[41] Nevertheless, the increase of hemostatic markers, such as D-dimer in renal disease, are considered risk factors for VTE in patients with renal disease.[42]

Nephrotic syndrome is considered a hypercoagulable state that is notoriously associated with DVT and PE. Among 100 patients with proteinuria, 53% had elevated D-dimer levels. When proteinuria was more than 1g/24 hours, elevation of D-dimer levels was seen in 69% of patients with proteinuria. D-dimer is believed to be related to the heavy proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome and subsequent hepatic synthesis of fibrinogen, where strong association between D-dimer elevation and hypoalbuminemia is found. It is also suggested that elevated serum fibrinopeptide A, thrombin-antithrombin III complex, along with products of thrombin and prothrombin, and the state of activated hemostasis in nephrotic syndrome causes the elevation of D-dimer with no evidence of clinical thrombosis.[43][44][41]

Sepsis and Septic Shock

D-dimer levels are almost always increased in patients with sepsis, septic shock, and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). According to the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Woldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial that included 1,690 septic patients, D-dimer was elevated in approximately 100% of patients.[45][46][47] Increase level of D-dimer is correlated with worsening severity and death. For instance, according to one study higher D-dimer levels were correlated with high risk of 28 day mortality such as the odds ratio are 2.07 (CI=95%) and 3.03 (CI=95%) in patients having a D-dimer level >1180 and >2409 respectively.[48] On the other hand, its decrease was associated with resolution of sepsis.[45][46][47] Higher D-dimer levels were correlated with high risk of 28 day mortality such as the odds ratio are 2.07 (CI=95%) and 3.03 (CI=95%) in patients having a D-dimer level >1180 and >2409 respectively.[48]

Sickle Cell Disease

The pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of sickle cell disease are mostly related to its hypercoagulable sickle-shaped red blood cells that contain phosphatydil serine moieties that contribute to their thrombogenic nature. In addition, endothelial dysfunction, sluggish blood flow, and increased transit time, all of which are associated with generation of subclinical or clinically relevant thrombin, are all factors generally augmented in patients with sickle cell disease. Elevated D-dimer levels is commonly found in up to 68% of homozygous sickle cell disease patients experiencing sickling crises and frequently associated with abnormal chest X-ray (CXR) findings.[49][50]

Stroke

Elevated D-dimer values can also be used to predict acute cerebrovascular events and subtypes. Levels increase remarkably during first 6 hours of stroke onset in patients with large occlusion and those being treated with intravenous thrombolytics regardless of time of artery recanalization.[51] D-dimer seems to have shown association with infarction volume[52] and with cardioembolic strokes but not atherothrombotic or lacunar strokes. According to Ageno et al. in 2002, the optimal D-dimer cut-off point for predicting cardioembolic stroke is 2 µg/mL with 93.2% specificity and 59.3% sensitivity. In contrast, the cut-off point for predicting lacunar stroke in the same study was 0.54 µg/mL with 96.2% specificity and 61.3% sensitivity.[53] Although it is suggested as a screening test for patients presenting with acute-onset headaches,[54] triage for high-risk patients who require antithrombotic therapy, and evaluating progressing strokes, defined by clinical worsening of symptoms following admission, the prognostic role of D-dimer in cases of strokes is unclear and yet to be determined.[55]

Surgery

D-dimer levels may be elevated after surgery and trauma independent of VTE and PE. The diagnosis of post-operative VTE, a common complication following surgery, becomes even a more challenging diagnosis for this specific subset of patients given the unpredictable and heterogeneous variation of post-operative D-dimer levels. The dynamics behind D-dimer elevation following surgery and trauma are poorly understood.[56]

In a study of 154 patients categorized according to different types of abdominal surgeries, surgeries that did not include entering the abdominal cavity did not reveal elevation in D-dimer. In contrast, approximately 44% of open and laparoscopic intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal (and liver) surgeries were associated with elevated D-dimer levels that normalized after 25 and 38 days post-operatively respectively. D-dimer was found to generally peak around day 7 post-operation. The right time post-operatively to use D-dimer without the effect of the surgery itself is yet to be determined, but believed to be more than 5 weeks following intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal. It is thought that following peak, D-dimer levels decline at a rate of 6% every day.( PMID: 19474701 - Dindo et al. 200). The length of the surgery was associated with the elevation of D-dimer. However, no cut-off surgery length is determined.[57]

Orthopedic surgeries are also associated with an increase in D-dimer levels. In a study that recruited 78 patients with cemented or hybrid total hip replacement and uncemented total knee replacement. During the first 7 days post-op, D-dimers were significantly elevated particularly on day 1 and 7 post-operatively, showing a double-peak distribution.[58][59]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sodeck G, Domanovits H, Schillinger M, Ehrlich MP, Endler G, Herkner H; et al. (2007). "D-dimer in ruling out acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and prospective cohort study". Eur Heart J. 28 (24): 3067–75. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm484. PMID 17986466.
  2. Dunn KL, Wolf JP, Dorfman DM, Fitzpatrick P, Baker JL, Goldhaber SZ (2002). "Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism". J Am Coll Cardiol. 40 (8): 1475–8. PMID 12392839. Review in: J Fam Pract. 2003 Feb;52(2):99, 103
  3. Chopra N, Doddamreddy P, Grewal H, Kumar PC (2012). "An elevated D-dimer value: a burden on our patients and hospitals". Int J Gen Med. 5: 87–92. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S25027. PMC 3273370. PMID 22319245.
  4. Der Sahakian G, Claessens YE, Allo JC, Kansao J, Kierzek G, Pourriat JL (2010). "Accuracy of D-Dimers to Rule Out Venous Thromboembolism Events across Age Categories". Emerg Med Int. 2010: 185453. doi:10.1155/2010/185453. PMC 3195346. PMID 22046531.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Cohen A, Ederhy S, Meuleman C, Di Angelantonio E, Dufaitre G, Boccara F (2007). "D-dimers in atrial fibrillation: a further step in risk stratification of thrombo-embolism?". Eur Heart J. 28 (18): 2179–80. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm170. PMID 17716992.
  6. Somlói M, Tomcsányi J, Nagy E, Bodó I, Bezzegh A (2003). "D-dimer determination as a screening tool to exclude atrial thrombi in atrial fibrillation". Am J Cardiol. 92 (1): 85–7. PMID 12842257.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Nozawa T, Inoue H, Hirai T, Iwasa A, Okumura K, Lee JD; et al. (2006). "D-dimer level influences thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation". Int J Cardiol. 109 (1): 59–65. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.05.049. PMID 15992948.
  8. de Maat MP, Bladbjerg EM, Drivsholm T, Borch-Johnsen K, Møller L, Jespersen J (2003). "Inflammation, thrombosis and atherosclerosis: results of the Glostrup study". J Thromb Haemost. 1 (5): 950–7. PMID 12871360.
  9. Cohen HJ, Harris T, Pieper CF (2003). "Coagulation and activation of inflammatory pathways in the development of functional decline and mortality in the elderly". Am J Med. 114 (3): 180–7. PMID 12637131.
  10. Salomaa V, Stinson V, Kark JD, Folsom AR, Davis CE, Wu KK (1995). "Association of fibrinolytic parameters with early atherosclerosis. The ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study". Circulation. 91 (2): 284–90. PMID 7805229.
  11. Koenig W, Rothenbacher D, Hoffmeister A, Griesshammer M, Brenner H (2001). "Plasma fibrin D-dimer levels and risk of stable coronary artery disease: results of a large case-control study". Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 21 (10): 1701–5. PMID 11597948.
  12. Lowe GD, Yarnell JW, Sweetnam PM, Rumley A, Thomas HF, Elwood PC (1998). "Fibrin D-dimer, tissue plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor, and the risk of major ischaemic heart disease in the Caerphilly Study". Thromb Haemost. 79 (1): 129–33. PMID 9459337.
  13. Lowe GD, Yarnell JW, Rumley A, Bainton D, Sweetnam PM (2001). "C-reactive protein, fibrin D-dimer, and incident ischemic heart disease in the Speedwell study: are inflammation and fibrin turnover linked in pathogenesis?". Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 21 (4): 603–10. PMID 11304479.
  14. Folsom AR, Aleksic N, Park E, Salomaa V, Juneja H, Wu KK (2001). "Prospective study of fibrinolytic factors and incident coronary heart disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study". Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 21 (4): 611–7. PMID 11304480.
  15. Cushman M, Lemaitre RN, Kuller LH, Psaty BM, Macy EM, Sharrett AR; et al. (1999). "Fibrinolytic activation markers predict myocardial infarction in the elderly. The Cardiovascular Health Study". Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 19 (3): 493–8. PMID 10073948.
  16. Fowkes FG, Lowe GD, Housley E, Rattray A, Rumley A, Elton RA; et al. (1993). "Cross-linked fibrin degradation products, progression of peripheral arterial disease, and risk of coronary heart disease". Lancet. 342 (8863): 84–6. PMID 8100915.
  17. Moss AJ, Goldstein RE, Marder VJ, Sparks CE, Oakes D, Greenberg H; et al. (1999). "Thrombogenic factors and recurrent coronary events". Circulation. 99 (19): 2517–22. PMID 10330382.
  18. Lippi G, Filippozzi L, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Guidi GC (2008). "Diagnostic value of D-dimer measurement in patients referred to the emergency department with suspected myocardial ischemia". J Thromb Thrombolysis. 25 (3): 247–50. doi:10.1007/s11239-007-0060-6. PMID 17541763.
  19. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P; et al. (2001). "Fibrin D-dimer and coronary heart disease: prospective study and meta-analysis". Circulation. 103 (19): 2323–7. PMID 11352877.
  20. Lowe GD, Rumley A (1999). "Use of fibrinogen and fibrin D-dimer in prediction of arterial thrombotic events". Thromb Haemost. 82 (2): 667–72. PMID 10605766.
  21. Tataru MC, Heinrich J, Junker R, Schulte H, von Eckardstein A, Assmann G; et al. (2000). "C-reactive protein and the severity of atherosclerosis in myocardial infarction patients with stable angina pectoris". Eur Heart J. 21 (12): 1000–8. PMID 10901512.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Lisman T, Porte RJ (2010). "Rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease: evidence and clinical consequences". Blood. 116 (6): 878–85. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-02-261891. PMID 20400681.
  23. 23.0 23.1 Sacerdoti D, Serianni G, Gaiani S, Bolognesi M, Bombonato G, Gatta A (2007). "Thrombosis of the portal venous system". J Ultrasound. 10 (1): 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jus.2007.02.007. PMC 3478708. PMID 23396402.
  24. Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, Saliola M, Quintarelli C, Alessandri C; et al. (1995). "Association between low-grade disseminated intravascular coagulation and endotoxemia in patients with liver cirrhosis". Gastroenterology. 109 (2): 531–9. PMID 7615203.
  25. Violi F, Ferro D, Basili S, Quintarelli C, Musca A, Cordova C; et al. (1993). "Hyperfibrinolysis resulting from clotting activation in patients with different degrees of cirrhosis. The CALC Group. Coagulation Abnormalities in Liver Cirrhosis". Hepatology. 17 (1): 78–83. PMID 8423044.
  26. Zhang DL, Hao JY, Yang N (2013). "Value of D-dimer and protein S for diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis". J Int Med Res. 41 (3): 664–72. doi:10.1177/0300060513483413. PMID 23637275.
  27. Primignani M, Dell'Era A, Bucciarelli P, Bottasso B, Bajetta MT, de Franchis R; et al. (2008). "High-D-dimer plasma levels predict poor outcome in esophageal variceal bleeding". Dig Liver Dis. 40 (11): 874–81. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2008.01.010. PMID 18329968.
  28. Fimognari FL, De Santis A, Piccheri C, Moscatelli R, Gigliotti F, Vestri A; et al. (2005). "Evaluation of D-dimer and factor VIII in cirrhotic patients with asymptomatic portal venous thrombosis". J Lab Clin Med. 146 (4): 238–43. doi:10.1016/j.lab.2005.06.003. PMID 16194685.
  29. Schutgens RE, Beckers MM, Haas FJ, Biesma DH (2005). "The predictive value of D-dimer measurement for cancer in patients with deep vein thrombosis". Haematologica. 90 (2): 214–9. PMID 15710574.
  30. Paneesha S, Cheyne E, French K, Delgado J, Borg A, Rose P (2005). "High D-dimer level at presentation in patients with venous thrombosis is a marker for malignancy". Haematologica. 90 (12 Suppl): ELT08. PMID 16464765.
  31. Rege KP, Jones S, Day J, Hoggarth CE (2004). "In proven deep vein thrombosis, a low positive D-Dimer score is a strong negative predictor for associated malignancy". Thromb Haemost. 91 (6): 1219–22. doi:10.1267/THRO04061219. PMID 15175810.
  32. 32.0 32.1 Ay C, Dunkler D, Pirker R, Thaler J, Quehenberger P, Wagner O; et al. (2012). "High D-dimer levels are associated with poor prognosis in cancer patients". Haematologica. 97 (8): 1158–64. doi:10.3324/haematol.2011.054718. PMC 3409812. PMID 22371182.
  33. Streetly M, Hunt BJ, Parmar K, Jones R, Zeldis J, Schey S (2005). "Markers of endothelial and haemostatic function in the treatment of relapsed myeloma with the immunomodulatory agent Actimid (CC-4047) and their relationship with venous thrombosis". Eur J Haematol. 74 (4): 293–6. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0609.2004.00393.x. PMID 15777340.
  34. Dirix LY, Salgado R, Weytjens R, Colpaert C, Benoy I, Huget P; et al. (2002). "Plasma fibrin D-dimer levels correlate with tumour volume, progression rate and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer". Br J Cancer. 86 (3): 389–95. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600069. PMC 2375200. PMID 11875705.
  35. Wang M, Lu S, Li S, Shen F (2013). "Reference intervals of D-dimer during the pregnancy and puerperium period on the STA-R evolution coagulation analyzer". Clin Chim Acta. 425C: 176–180. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.006. PMID 23954836.
  36. Kline JA, Williams GW, Hernandez-Nino J (2005). "D-dimer concentrations in normal pregnancy: new diagnostic thresholds are needed". Clin Chem. 51 (5): 825–9. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2004.044883. PMID 15764641.
  37. Kovac M, Mikovic Z, Rakicevic L, Srzentic S, Mandic V, Djordjevic V; et al. (2010). "The use of D-dimer with new cutoff can be useful in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy". Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 148 (1): 27–30. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.005. PMID 19804940.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Shitrit D, Bendayan D, Bar-Gil-Shitrit A, Huerta M, Rudensky B, Fink G; et al. (2002). "Significance of a plasma D-dimer test in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension". Chest. 122 (5): 1674–8. PMID 12426270.
  39. 39.0 39.1 Arunthari V, Burger CD (2009). "Utility of d-dimer in the diagnosis of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension". Open Respir Med J. 3: 85–9. doi:10.2174/1874306400903010085. PMC 2703202. PMID 19572023.
  40. Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Stehman-Breen C, Siscovick D, Newman AB (2004). "Chronic renal insufficiency and cardiovascular events in the elderly: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study". Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 13 (2): 81–90. PMID 15010654.
  41. 41.0 41.1 Sexton DJ, Clarkson MR, Mazur MJ, Plant WD, Eustace JA (2012). "Serum D-dimer concentrations in nephrotic syndrome track with albuminuria, not estimated glomerular filtration rate". Am J Nephrol. 36 (6): 554–60. doi:10.1159/000345475. PMID 23221061.
  42. Dubin R, Cushman M, Folsom AR, Fried LF, Palmas W, Peralta CA; et al. (2011). "Kidney function and multiple hemostatic markers: cross sectional associations in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis". BMC Nephrol. 12: 3. doi:10.1186/1471-2369-12-3. PMC 3037849. PMID 21269477.
  43. Chen TY, Huang CC, Tsao CJ (1993). "Hemostatic molecular markers in nephrotic syndrome". Am J Hematol. 44 (4): 276–9. PMID 8238000.
  44. Singhal R, Brimble KS (2006). "Thromboembolic complications in the nephrotic syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical management". Thromb Res. 118 (3): 397–407. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2005.03.030. PMID 15990160.
  45. 45.0 45.1 Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A; et al. (2001). "Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis". N Engl J Med. 344 (10): 699–709. doi:10.1056/NEJM200103083441001. PMID 11236773.
  46. 46.0 46.1 Kinasewitz GT, Yan SB, Basson B, Comp P, Russell JA, Cariou A; et al. (2004). "Universal changes in biomarkers of coagulation and inflammation occur in patients with severe sepsis, regardless of causative micro-organism [ISRCTN74215569]". Crit Care. 8 (2): R82–90. doi:10.1186/cc2459. PMC 420030. PMID 15025782.
  47. 47.0 47.1 Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Abrahamian FM, Moran GJ, Abraham E, Trzeciak S; et al. (2006). "Severe sepsis and septic shock: review of the literature and emergency department management guidelines". Ann Emerg Med. 48 (1): 28–54. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.02.015. PMID 16781920.
  48. 48.0 48.1 Rodelo JR, De la Rosa G, Valencia ML, Ospina S, Arango CM, Gómez CI; et al. (2012). "D-dimer is a significant prognostic factor in patients with suspected infection and sepsis". Am J Emerg Med. 30 (9): 1991–9. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.033. PMID 22795996.
  49. Dar J, Mughal I, Hassan H, Al Mekki TE, Chapunduka Z, Hassan IS (2010). "Raised D-dimer levels in acute sickle cell crisis and their correlation with chest X-ray abnormalities". Ger Med Sci. 8: Doc25. doi:10.3205/000114. PMC 2975260. PMID 21063468.
  50. Setty BN, Rao AK, Stuart MJ (2001). "Thrombophilia in sickle cell disease: the red cell connection". Blood. 98 (12): 3228–33. PMID 11719358.
  51. Skoloudík D, Bar M, Sanák D, Bardon P, Roubec M, Langová K; et al. (2010). "D-dimers increase in acute ischemic stroke patients with the large artery occlusion, but do not depend on the time of artery recanalization". J Thromb Thrombolysis. 29 (4): 477–82. doi:10.1007/s11239-009-0372-9. PMID 19568692.
  52. Park YW, Koh EJ, Choi HY (2011). "Correlation between Serum D-Dimer Level and Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke". J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 50 (2): 89–94. doi:10.3340/jkns.2011.50.2.89. PMC 3206284. PMID 22053225.
  53. Ageno W, Finazzi S, Steidl L, Biotti MG, Mera V, Melzi D'Eril G; et al. (2002). "Plasma measurement of D-dimer levels for the early diagnosis of ischemic stroke subtypes". Arch Intern Med. 162 (22): 2589–93. PMID 12456231.
  54. Squizzato A, Ageno W (2005). "D-dimer testing in ischemic stroke and cerebral sinus and venous thrombosis". Semin Vasc Med. 5 (4): 379–86. doi:10.1055/s-2005-922484. PMID 16302160.
  55. Barber M, Langhorne P, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Stott DJ (2006). "D-dimer predicts early clinical progression in ischemic stroke: confirmation using routine clinical assays". Stroke. 37 (4): 1113–5. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000209240.63821.1a. PMID 16527998.
  56. Lippi G, Veraldi GF, Fraccaroli M, Manzato F, Cordiano C, Guidi G (2001). "Variation of plasma D-dimer following surgery: implications for prediction of postoperative venous thromboembolism". Clin Exp Med. 1 (3): 161–4. PMID 11833854.
  57. Dindo D, Breitenstein S, Hahnloser D, Seifert B, Yakarisik S, Asmis LM; et al. (2009). "Kinetics of D-dimer after general surgery". Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 20 (5): 347–52. doi:10.1097/MBC.0b013e32832a5fe6. PMID 19474701.
  58. Shiota N, Sato T, Nishida K, Matsuo M, Takahara Y, Mitani S; et al. (2002). "Changes in LPIA D-dimer levels after total hip or knee arthroplasty relevant to deep-vein thrombosis diagnosed by bilateral ascending venography". J Orthop Sci. 7 (4): 444–50. doi:10.1007/s007760200077. PMID 12181657.
  59. Rafee A, Herlikar D, Gilbert R, Stockwell RC, McLauchlan GJ (2008). "D-Dimer in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis following total hip and knee replacement: a prospective study". Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 90 (2): 123–6. doi:10.1308/003588408X261627. PMC 2443306. PMID 18325211.

Template:WH Template:WS