Back pain monitoring response to therapy

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Back pain Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Back Pain from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Non-Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Lecture

Back Pain

Case Studies

Case #1

Back pain monitoring response to therapy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Back pain monitoring response to therapy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Back pain monitoring response to therapy

CDC on Back pain monitoring response to therapy

Back pain monitoring response to therapy in the news

Blogs on Back pain monitoring response to therapy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Back pain

Risk calculators and risk factors for Back pain monitoring response to therapy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Zehra Malik, M.B.B.S[2]

Overview

Methods of determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)

The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (ODQ) contains 10 questions that have 5-point Likert scale answers and can measure the response to therapy.[1]

  • The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) has been proposed as >0.5 standard deviation improvement.[2]
  • MCID of 12.8 has been proposed[3]
    • Copay et al used various methods to determine the optimal MCID[3].
      • Receiver-operating characteristic curve derived MCID: " The optimal cut-off value for a ROC curve corresponds to the point of optimal trade-off between sensitivity and specificity "
      • Half a standard deviation: Template:Sfrac \times {SD}
      • Standard error of measurement SD \times \sqrt{1 - r}, "where SD is the standard deviation of the baseline scores and r is the test-retest reliability coefficient"
      • Minimum detectable change: 1.96 \times \sqrt{2} \times{SEM}
      • Effect size derived MCID: "multiplying the SD of the baseline scores by 0.2 (the small effect size)"

Recommendations for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)

Copay calculated the MCID to be 12.8[3]. Davidson recommends an MCID of 10.5 or 15[4].

Vianin's literature review finds the range of MCIDs proposed is 4 to 10.5.[5]

See also

References

  1. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980). "The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire". Physiotherapy. 66 (8): 271–3. PMID 6450426.
  2. Delitto A, Piva SR, Moore CG, Fritz JM, Wisniewski SR, Josbeno DA; et al. (2015). "Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial". Ann Intern Med. 162 (7): 465–73. doi:10.7326/M14-1420. PMC 6252248. PMID 25844995. Review in: Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb;21(1):31
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY (2008). "Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales". Spine J. 8 (6): 968–74. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. PMID 18201937.
  4. Davidson M, Keating JL (2002). "A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness". Phys Ther. 82 (1): 8–24. doi:10.1093/ptj/82.1.8. PMID 11784274.
  5. Vianin M (2008). "Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index". J Chiropr Med. 7 (4): 161–3. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2008.07.001. PMC 2697602. PMID 19646379.

Template:WikiDoc Sources