Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 from other Diseases

Epidemiology & Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications & Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery

CDC on Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery in the news

Blogs on Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery

Directions to Hospitals Treating Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Risk calculators and risk factors for Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 surgery

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Ammu Susheela, M.D. [2]

Overview

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

Surgery

Management of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 patients includes thyroidectomy including cervical central and bilateral lymph nodes dissection for medullary thyroid carcinoma, unilateral adrenalectomy for unilateral pheochromocytoma or bilateral adrenalectomy when both glands are involved and selective resection of pathologic parathyroid glands for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Medullary Thyroid Cancer

Conventional Therapy

Prophylactic or Precocious Thyroidectomy in RET Gene Carrier

  • Prophylactic thyroidectomy is advised in gene carriers to guarantee a definitive cure in these subjects. Four different risk levels (from A, the lowest, to D the highest) for RET mutations have been suggested by the American Thyroid Association task force, which developed the most recent guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma patients.[4] According to these guidelines, these levels of risk, which are related to the clinical aggressiveness of the corresponding medullary thyroid carcinoma, should be taken into consideration when planning surgical treatment. In particular patients with a level D, RET mutation (i.e., Met918Thr) should be treated as soon as possible in the first year of life; patients with level B and C mutations (located in exons 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15) should be operated on before 5 years of age; only for patients with a level A mutation (exon 8 and 5 mutations), total thyroidectomy can be delayed after five years of age or until the CT positivity.
  • During the Seventh International Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Meeting in Gubbio in 1999, the risk of MTC has been stratified in three categories according to the mutations of c-RET as following.
Prophylactic Thyroidectomy
Gene Risk Treatment
Children with MEN2B and/or c-RET codon 883, 918,

922

Highest risk of aggressive medullary thyroid carcinoma Total thyroidectomy with

central node dissection, within the first six months.

Children with any c-RET codon 611, 618, 620 or 634

mutations

High risk of medullary thyroid carcinoma Total thyroidectomy should be performed before age of

five years, with or without central node dissection.

Children with c-RET codon 609, 768, 790, 791, 804

and 891 mutations

Less aggressive and slowly growing medullary thyroid carcinoma Operated at a later stage
  • Recently, some evidences in big series of RET gene carriers demonstrated that gene carriers with undetectable levels of basal calcitonin have an almost null risk to have already developed the medullary thyroid carcinoma.[5][6] Moreover, a serum Ct <30–40 pg/mL is always associated to an intrathyroidal micro-medullary thyroid carcinoma without any evidence of lymph node metastases. Taking into account these observation, Elisei et al. [7] designed a study in which they operated on only RET gene carriers on the basis of basal and stimulated CT. According to their results, the time of surgical treatment could be personalized and safely planned when the stimulated serum CT becomes positive at the annual control, independently from the type of RET mutation and its associated level of risk. Of course, both cysteine RET mutations and older age are risk factors for having an earlier positive result for either basal or Pg-stimulated serum calcitonin. For these reasons, the follow-up controls should be more or less frequent in cysteine or noncysteine RET-mutated gene carriers, respectively. This strategy obviously implies a high compliance of the RET gene carriers to the scheduled followup with the advantage that young children can be treated later, sometime even after the puberty, close to the adulthood.
ESMO clinical practice guidelines for treatment of medullary cell carcinoma
Post Surgery
  • Thyroid should supplemented be supplemented for patients undergoing total thyroidectomy.[8]
  • Serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling time (CEA DT) are measured during post surgical follow-up.
  • Provacative pentagastrin or calcium test is administered and serum calcitonin level is measured.
  • If there is no significant elevation in serum calcitonin level, serum calcitonin is measured every 6 months for 2-3 years and then yearly.
  • If the calcitonin is below 150 pg/ml, USG neck is recommended.
  • If the basal serum calcitonin is above 150 pg/ml, screening for distant metastasis is recommended.
ESMO clinical practice guidelines for treatment of medullary cell carcinoma

References

  1. Machens A, Hauptmann S, Dralle H (2007). "Increased risk of lymph node metastasis in multifocal hereditary and sporadic medullary thyroid cancer". World J Surg. 31 (10): 1960–5. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9185-1. PMID 17665245.
  2. Russell CF, Van Heerden JA, Sizemore GW, Edis AJ, Taylor WF, ReMine WH; et al. (1983). "The surgical management of medullary thyroid carcinoma". Ann Surg. 197 (1): 42–8. PMC 1352852. PMID 6128962.
  3. Walz MK, Alesina PF (2009). "Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA)--one step beyond in endocrine surgery". Langenbecks Arch Surg. 394 (3): 447–50. doi:10.1007/s00423-008-0418-z. PMID 18784938.
  4. American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force. Kloos RT, Eng C, Evans DB, Francis GL, Gagel RF; et al. (2009). "Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association". Thyroid. 19 (6): 565–612. doi:10.1089/thy.2008.0403. PMID 19469690.
  5. Lau GS, Lang BH, Lo CY, Tso A, Garcia-Barcelo MM, Tam PK; et al. (2009). "Prophylactic thyroidectomy in ethnic Chinese patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A syndrome after the introduction of genetic testing". Hong Kong Med J. 15 (5): 326–31. PMID 19801688.
  6. Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). "Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes". Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMID http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1234 Check |pmid= value (help).
  7. Schmoldt A, Benthe HF, Haberland G (1975). "Digitoxin metabolism by rat liver microsomes". Biochem Pharmacol. 24 (17): 1639–41. PMID http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2046 Check |pmid= value (help).
  8. Pacini F, Castagna MG, Brilli L, Pentheroudakis G, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2012). "Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up". Ann Oncol. 23 Suppl 7: vii110–9. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds230. PMID 22997443.

Template:WikiDoc Sources