Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X Ray

CT

MRI

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology

on Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology in the news

Blogs on Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology

Directions to Hospitals Treating Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Risk calculators and risk factors for Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance pathophysiology

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Omer Kamal, M.D.[2]

Overview

Pathologically, the lesion in Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is in fact very similar to that in multiple myeloma. What causes Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to transform into multiple myeloma is as yet unknown.

Pathophysiology

  • Pathologically, the lesion in MGUS is in fact very similar to that in multiple myeloma.
  • There is a predominance of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow with an abnormal immunophenotype (CD38+ CD56+ CD19−) mixed in with cells of a normal phenotype (CD38+ CD56− CD19+).[1][2]
  • In MGUS, more than 3% of the clonal plasma cells have the normal phenotype, whereas in multiple myeloma, less than 3% of the cells have the normal phenotype.[3] What causes MGUS to transform into multiple myeloma is as yet unknown.
  • The transformation of normal plasma cells to MGUS to multiple myeloma involves several steps of gene mutations.[4]
  • After the stimulation by the antigens due to toll-like cell receptors expression, overexpression of interleukin receptors for example IL-6 and loss of regulation of cyclin D gene.[5][6][7]
  • Patients with MGUS may have a "gamma-spike" on serum electrophoresis, as shown below:
Courtesy:Wikimedia


References

  1. Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordsmeier B, Bumm K, Zheng M, Tian E, Sanderson R, Yang Y, Wilson C, Zangari M, Anaissie E, Morris C, Muwalla F, van Rhee F, Fassas A, Crowley J, Tricot G, Barlogie B, Shaughnessy J (2002). "Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells". Blood. 99 (5): 1745–57. PMID 11861292.
  2. Magrangeas F, Nasser V, Avet-Loiseau H, Loriod B, Decaux O, Granjeaud S, Bertucci F, Birnbaum D, Nguyen C, Harousseau J, Bataille R, Houlgatte R, Minvielle S (2003). "Gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma reveals molecular portraits in relation to the pathogenesis of the disease". Blood. 101 (12): 4998–5006. PMID 12623842.
  3. Ocqueteau M, Orfao A, Almeida J, Bladé J, González M, García-Sanz R, López-Berges C, Moro M, Hernández J, Escribano L, Caballero D, Rozman M, San Miguel J (1998). "Immunophenotypic characterization of plasma cells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. Implications for the differential diagnosis between MGUS and multiple myeloma". Am J Pathol. 152 (6): 1655–65. PMID 9626070.
  4. Chng WJ, Glebov O, Bergsagel PL, Kuehl WM (December 2007). "Genetic events in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma". Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 20 (4): 571–96. doi:10.1016/j.beha.2007.08.004. PMC 2198931. PMID 18070707.
  5. Jego G, Bataille R, Geffroy-Luseau A, Descamps G, Pellat-Deceunynck C (June 2006). "Pathogen-associated molecular patterns are growth and survival factors for human myeloma cells through Toll-like receptors". Leukemia. 20 (6): 1130–7. doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404226. PMID 16628189.
  6. Dinarello CA (February 2009). "Targeting the pathogenic role of interleukin 1{beta} in the progression of smoldering/indolent myeloma to active disease". Mayo Clin. Proc. 84 (2): 105–7. doi:10.4065/84.2.105. PMC 2664579. PMID 19181642.
  7. Merlini G, Palladini G (2012). "Differential diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance". Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012: 595–603. doi:10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.595. PMID 23233640.

Template:WH Template:WS