Tricuspid atresia CT

	Tricuspid atresia Microchapters
Home
Patient Information
Overview
Pathophysiology
Causes
Differentiating Tricuspid Atresia from other Disorders
Epidemiology and Demographics
Risk Factors
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
Diagnosis
History and Symptoms
Physical Examination
Laboratory Findings
Electrocardiogram
Chest X Ray
CT
MRI
Echocardiography
Cardiac Catheterization
Other Imaging Findings
Other Diagnostic Studies
Treatment
Medical Therapy
Surgery
Primary Prevention
Secondary Prevention
Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy
Future or Investigational Therapies
Special Scenarios
Pregnancy
Case Studies
Case #1
Tricuspid atresia CT On the Web
Most recent articles
Most cited articles
Review articles
CME Programs
Powerpoint slides
Images
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Tricuspid atresia CT All Images X-rays Echo & Ultrasound CT Images MRI
Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse
NICE Guidance
FDA on Tricuspid atresia CT
CDC on Tricuspid atresia CT
Tricuspid atresia CT in the news
Blogs on Tricuspid atresia CT
Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here
Risk calculators and risk factors for Tricuspid atresia CT

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Associate Editor-In-Chief: Keri Shafer, M.D. [2] Priyamvada Singh, MBBS [[3]]

Assistant Editor-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [[4]]

Overview

Computed tomography can be helpful as a diagnostic tool in conditions where the echocardiographic findings are inconclusive.

Computed tomography (CT) can be used as a diagnostic modality in congenital heart diseases.

Advantages

Provides additional anatomic details compared to echocardiography
It is done faster compared to MRI, thus avoiding the need for anesthesia in small children.

Disadvantage