Sandbox:Prince: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable"
! colspan="3" |ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY IN FUNGAL MENINGITIS
|-
!Type of fungal meningitis
!Preferred therapy
!Alternate therapy
|-
|''Aspergillus''
|Voriconazole 6 mg/kg IV q12h on day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg q12h; further conversion to oral therapy may be considered. Typical oral dosing is 200 mg q12h but is dependent on therapeutic drug monitoring.
Total duration of therapy has not been defined. Multiple factors must be considered, including extent of disease, response to therapy, and underlying immune status of the host.
|Liposomal AmB 3-5 mg/kg/day IV, ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV, itraconazole 200 mg PO BID, or posaconazole 200 mg PO q6h. Note that combination therapy with voriconazole and an echinocandin such as caspofungin 70 mg IV on day 1 and 50 mg/day IV thereafter may be considered.
|-
|''Candida''
|LFAmB 3-5 mg/kg/day +/− flucytosine 25 mg/kg QID for ∼3 weeks followed by fluconazole 400-800 mg/day PO/IV (6-12 mg/kg/day)
Treatment continued until clinical signs and symptoms resolved and CNS and radiographic abnormalities have normalized.
|Fluconazole 400-800 mg/day PO/IV (6-12 mg/kg/day)
|-
|''Blastomyces''
|LFAmB 5 mg/kg/day for 4-6 weeks followed by fluconazole 800 mg/day PO/IV
Treatment for at least 12 months and until resolution of CSF abnormalities
|Alternative azole considerations include itraconazole 200 mg PO BID to TID and voriconazole 200-400 mg PO BID.
|-
|''Coccidioides''
|Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO/IV. Some use higher doses of fluconazole, up to 1,000 mg/day up-front.
Azole therapy is typically continued indefinitely.
|Itraconazole 200 mg PO BID to TID
The addition of intrathecal AmBd to azole therapy may be considered in those not responding to azoles. Intrathecal AmBd dosing ranges from 0.1 to 1.5 mg per dose given daily to weekly.
|-
|''Cryptococcus''
|HIV-infection
(Induction/consolidation):
AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day IV plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID for at least 2 weeks followed by fluconazole 400 mg/day PO/IV (6 mg/kg/day); LFAmB may be substituted for AmBd if necessary: liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV and ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV.
(Maintenance):
Fluconazole 200 mg/day<sup>[null ''b'']</sup>
Solid organ transplant:
LFAmB (liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV or ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV) plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID for at least 2 weeks followed by fluconazole 400-800 mg/day PO/IV (6-12 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks followed by fluconazole 200-400 mg/day for 6-12 months
Non-HIV, non-organ transplant:
AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day IV plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg QID for at least 4 weeks followed by fluconazole 200 mg/day (3 mg/kg) for 6-12 months
|HIV-infection
(Induction/consolidation):
AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day IV or LFAmB (liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV and ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV) monotherapy for 4-6 weeks; AmBd 0.7 mg/kg/day IV plus fluconazole 800 mg/day PO/IV for 2 weeks followed by fluconazole 800 mg/day for a minimum of 8 weeks; fluconazole (≥800 mg/day) PO/IV plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID for 6 weeks
(Maintenance):
Itraconazole 200 mg PO BID<sup>[null ''b'']</sup>
Solid organ transplant:
If flucytosine not used, then consider extension of induction with LFAmB for at least 4-6 weeks.
Non-HIV, non-organ transplant:
LFAmB (liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV or ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV) can be substituted in those unable to tolerate AmBd; if flucytosine not used, then consider extension of AmBd or LFAmB induction for at least 2 additional weeks.
|-
|''Exserohilum''
|Voriconazole 6 mg/kg IV every 12h with assessment of voriconazole trough concentrations on day 5 of therapy with adjustment to achieve trough of 2-5 mcg/ml. IV therapy should be initiated in most cases with transition to PO therapy once improving and clinically stable.
Total duration of therapy is unknown and will depend on extent of infection, response to therapy, and underlying immune status of the host. Minimum duration of 3-6 months.
|The addition of liposomal AmB 5-6 mg/kg/day IV should be considered in patients with severe disease and/or not responding appropriately to voriconazole monotherapy. Doses of liposomal AmB up to 7.5 mg/kg/day IV may be considered in patients who continue to do poorly.
|-
|''Histoplasma''
|Liposomal AmB 5 mg/kg/day IV for 4-6 weeks followed by itraconazole 200 mg BID to TID for at least 1 year and until resolution of CSF abnormalities including ''Histoplasma'' antigen levels.
|AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day is an alternative to liposomal AmB in patients at low risk of nephrotoxicity.
|-
|
|IV, intravenous; AmB, amphotericin B; ABLC, amphotericin B lipid complex; PO, per os, oral administration; BID, twice daily; LFAmB, lipid formulations of amphotericin B; TID, three times daily; QID, four times daily; AmBd, amphotericin B deoxycholate.
|
|}





Revision as of 14:27, 2 February 2017

ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY IN FUNGAL MENINGITIS
Type of fungal meningitis Preferred therapy Alternate therapy
Aspergillus Voriconazole 6 mg/kg IV q12h on day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg q12h; further conversion to oral therapy may be considered. Typical oral dosing is 200 mg q12h but is dependent on therapeutic drug monitoring.

Total duration of therapy has not been defined. Multiple factors must be considered, including extent of disease, response to therapy, and underlying immune status of the host.

Liposomal AmB 3-5 mg/kg/day IV, ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV, itraconazole 200 mg PO BID, or posaconazole 200 mg PO q6h. Note that combination therapy with voriconazole and an echinocandin such as caspofungin 70 mg IV on day 1 and 50 mg/day IV thereafter may be considered.
Candida LFAmB 3-5 mg/kg/day +/− flucytosine 25 mg/kg QID for ∼3 weeks followed by fluconazole 400-800 mg/day PO/IV (6-12 mg/kg/day)

Treatment continued until clinical signs and symptoms resolved and CNS and radiographic abnormalities have normalized.

Fluconazole 400-800 mg/day PO/IV (6-12 mg/kg/day)
Blastomyces LFAmB 5 mg/kg/day for 4-6 weeks followed by fluconazole 800 mg/day PO/IV

Treatment for at least 12 months and until resolution of CSF abnormalities

Alternative azole considerations include itraconazole 200 mg PO BID to TID and voriconazole 200-400 mg PO BID.
Coccidioides Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO/IV. Some use higher doses of fluconazole, up to 1,000 mg/day up-front.

Azole therapy is typically continued indefinitely.

Itraconazole 200 mg PO BID to TID

The addition of intrathecal AmBd to azole therapy may be considered in those not responding to azoles. Intrathecal AmBd dosing ranges from 0.1 to 1.5 mg per dose given daily to weekly.

Cryptococcus HIV-infection

(Induction/consolidation):

AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day IV plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID for at least 2 weeks followed by fluconazole 400 mg/day PO/IV (6 mg/kg/day); LFAmB may be substituted for AmBd if necessary: liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV and ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV.

(Maintenance):

Fluconazole 200 mg/day[null b]

Solid organ transplant:

LFAmB (liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV or ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV) plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID for at least 2 weeks followed by fluconazole 400-800 mg/day PO/IV (6-12 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks followed by fluconazole 200-400 mg/day for 6-12 months

Non-HIV, non-organ transplant:

AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day IV plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg QID for at least 4 weeks followed by fluconazole 200 mg/day (3 mg/kg) for 6-12 months

HIV-infection

(Induction/consolidation):

AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day IV or LFAmB (liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV and ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV) monotherapy for 4-6 weeks; AmBd 0.7 mg/kg/day IV plus fluconazole 800 mg/day PO/IV for 2 weeks followed by fluconazole 800 mg/day for a minimum of 8 weeks; fluconazole (≥800 mg/day) PO/IV plus flucytosine 25 mg/kg PO QID for 6 weeks

(Maintenance):

Itraconazole 200 mg PO BID[null b]

Solid organ transplant:

If flucytosine not used, then consider extension of induction with LFAmB for at least 4-6 weeks.

Non-HIV, non-organ transplant:

LFAmB (liposomal AmB 3-4 mg/kg/day IV or ABLC 5 mg/kg/day IV) can be substituted in those unable to tolerate AmBd; if flucytosine not used, then consider extension of AmBd or LFAmB induction for at least 2 additional weeks.

Exserohilum Voriconazole 6 mg/kg IV every 12h with assessment of voriconazole trough concentrations on day 5 of therapy with adjustment to achieve trough of 2-5 mcg/ml. IV therapy should be initiated in most cases with transition to PO therapy once improving and clinically stable.

Total duration of therapy is unknown and will depend on extent of infection, response to therapy, and underlying immune status of the host. Minimum duration of 3-6 months.

The addition of liposomal AmB 5-6 mg/kg/day IV should be considered in patients with severe disease and/or not responding appropriately to voriconazole monotherapy. Doses of liposomal AmB up to 7.5 mg/kg/day IV may be considered in patients who continue to do poorly.
Histoplasma Liposomal AmB 5 mg/kg/day IV for 4-6 weeks followed by itraconazole 200 mg BID to TID for at least 1 year and until resolution of CSF abnormalities including Histoplasma antigen levels. AmBd 0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day is an alternative to liposomal AmB in patients at low risk of nephrotoxicity.
IV, intravenous; AmB, amphotericin B; ABLC, amphotericin B lipid complex; PO, per os, oral administration; BID, twice daily; LFAmB, lipid formulations of amphotericin B; TID, three times daily; QID, four times daily; AmBd, amphotericin B deoxycholate.





According to severity of the disease
Mild
  • Early diagnosis and treatment
  • Responds to medical treatment
  • Typical clinical presentation
  • Good prognosis
Moderate
  • May present late with typical or atypical symptoms
  • May present with complications
  • Variable response to treatment
Severe
  • Presents with complications or prolonged illness
  • Immunocompromised
  • Common in extremes of age
  • Delayed diagnosis and treatment
  • Surgical treatment may be required in addition to medical treatment
  • Increased morbidity and mortality
According to the duration of disease[1]
Acute
  • Lasts few weeks
  • Patient acutely ill
  • Mostly in HIV-associated patients
  • Impaired consciousness
  • Seeks medical treatment early due to sudden deterioration
Subacute
  • Lasts less than 4 weeks
  • Patient acutely ill
  • Mostly in HIV-associated patients
  • Impaired consciousness
  • Seeks medical treatment early due to sudden deterioration
Chronic
  • Lasts more than 4 weeks
  • Gradual deterioration of patient
  • Prolonged history of atypical symptoms
  • Common in older patients
Recurrent
  • Multiple episodes which lasts less than 4 weeks
  • History of incompliance to medication
  • immunosuppression may be the underlying cause










Variable Empyema Thoracis Lung abscess Pleural effusion Pneumonia Lung cancer
Presentation Variable presentation

but may follow long standing pneumonia

Usually has history of aspiration pneumonia, alcoholics, drug abusers, seizure disorder, have undergone recent general anesthesia, or have a nasogastric or endotracheal tube. Usually follows pneumonia as a complication presents with fever, pleuritc chest pain, cough mostly asymptomatic but may

have cough productive with

hemoptysis and

chronic history of smoking

Causes In general any bacteria

can cause an empyema, however different bacteria are associated

with different rates of empyema formation.[1]  Common causes include bacteroidesfusobacterium

haemophilus influenzaepneumococcal infections,

staphylococcus aureus,

streptococcusTB

Lung abscess is commonly caused by bacterial infections and these include bacteroides, peptostreptococcus and prevotella mostly after aspiration Common causes of transudative pleural effusion include;[1][2][3][4][5] left ventricular failureNephrotic syndrome, and cirrhosis, while common causes of exudative pleural effusions[6] are bacterial pneumonia and malignancy Pneumonia can result from a variety of causes, including infection with bacteriavirusesfungiparasites, and chemical injury to the lungs Direct cause of lung cancers

is DNA mutations that often

result in either activation

of proto-oncogenes

(e.g. K-RAS) or the inactivation of tumors suppressor genes

(e.g. TP53) or both. The risk of these genetic mutations may be increased following exposure to environmental components example smoking

Laboratory findings The pleural fluid typically has a low pH (<7.20),

low glucose (<60 mg/dL), and contains infectious organisms.

Therefore, the diagnosis relies on the presence of pus or organisms on gram stain. A positive bacteria culture from pleural fluid is not needed to make diagnosis of empyema.[2][3]

Raised inflammatory markers ( eg high ESRCRP) are usual but not specific The most widely used criteria is to differentiate between exudate and transudate using the light's criteria. Fluid is exudate when:
  • Pleural fluid protein/serum protein ratio >0.5
  • Fluid/serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) ratio >0.6
  • Fluid LDH greater than 2/3 the upper limits of normal of the serum LDH
Laboratory findings are non specific example leukocytosis, sputum samples for gram staining and culture. Other tests include urine antigen test, PCR, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin The laboratory findings are 

non specific including:

neutropeniahyponatremia,

hypokalemiahypercalcemia,

respiratory acidosis,

hypercarbiahypoxia, and

tumor cells in sputum and

pleural effusion cytology.

Physical examination On examination, the following

findings may be seen:[4][5][6]

Lateral chest wall swelling

and tenderness, clubbing of the fingernails, dull percussion note, r

educed breath sounds on the affected side of the chest, egophony, coarse crackles, increased tactile fremitus,

mediastinal shift to opposite side with large empyema

Chest examination shows features of consolidation such as localised dullness on percussion, bronchial breath sound etc.

Dental decay is common especially in alcoholics and children. Clubbing is present in one third of patients.

Bulging of the intercostal spaces,

decreased chest expansion

bronchovesicular breath sounds

of decreased intensity, egophony,

dullness to percussion,

decreased or absent fremitus.

Physical examination increased respiratory rate, low oxygen saturation, difficulty breathing, bronchial breathe sounds, increased tactile fremitus crackling sounds, or increased whispered pectoriloquy.  Physical examination findings are non specific and may include decreased/absent breath soundspallor, low-grade fever, tachypnea and cachezia.
CXR Chest X ray of empyema shows air-fluid level continuos homogenous pattern from the mediastinum to the chest wall forming obtuse angle with the lung parenchyma.[7]

Chest xray shows often unilateral cavity containing an air-fluid level and consolidation of lung parenchyema.

A homogenous opacification is noted at the affected side. The costophrenic angle is obliterated with a meniscus. CXR shows areas of diffused opacities. CXR may show lung mass, widening of the mediastinumatelectasis, or pleural effusion.
Chest ultrasound Ultrasound in empyema is positive

for suspended microbubble sign,

air fluid level, curtains sign

and loss of gliding sign.[8]

Ultrasound in lung abscess is negative for suspended microbubble sign, curtains sign and loss of gliding sign but air fluid level may be seen,.[9] Ultrasonography is helpful in making diagnosis of pleural effusion particularly in differentiating effusion from masses.[10] The extended thoracic spine sign on sonography has high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing pleural effusion.[11] Chest or upper abdominal ultrasound may show subpulmonic effusion as shown below.[12][13][14] Not reqiured unless complicated with empyema USG is helpful in guiding biopsy, staging and estimating prognosis. It may show hypo- and hyperechogenic masses.[15][16][17]
CT scan Seen as a lung mass whose cavity

is regular with smooth

and regular lumen, well-defined

boundary and shape changes

with change in patient's position.[18]

Mass may resolve on antibiotics The split pleura sign is present[19]

(most reliable sign to differentiate

empyema from lung abscess)[20]

Lung mass whose cavity is rregular with undulated lumen, irregular-poorly defined boundary and shape does not change with change in patient's position.[21] Mass may resolve on antibiotics In most cases CT imaging may not provide additional information that would influence the clinical decision-making process.[22][23] [24] CT scan shows heterogeneous opacification of the affected side and cardiomediastinal shift to the opposite site in unilateral effusion.[25]
  • CT findings in pneumonia include:[1]
Seen as a spiculated irregular solid mass that does not resolve on antibiotics
  1. Zheng H, Chen Q, Xie Z, Wang D, Li M, Zhang X; et al. (2016). "A retrospective research of HIV-negative cryptococcal meningoencephalitis patients with acute/subacute onset". Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 35 (2): 299–303. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2545-0. PMID 26792138.
  2. Mavroudis C, Ganzel BL, Cox SK, Polk HC (1987). "Experimental aerobic-anaerobic thoracic empyema in the guinea pig". Ann Thorac Surg. 43 (3): 298–302. PMID 3548615.
  3. Perez VP, Caierão J, Fischer GB, Dias CA, d'Azevedo PA (2016). "Pleural effusion with negative culture: a challenge for pneumococcal diagnosis in children". Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 86 (2): 200–4. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.07.022. PMID 27527890.
  4. Atay S, Banki F, Floyd C (2016). "Empyema necessitans caused by actinomycosis: A case report". Int J Surg Case Rep. 23: 182–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.04.005. PMC 5022073. PMID 27180228.
  5. Gomes MM, Alves M, Correia JB, Santos L (2013). "Empyema necessitans: very late complication of pulmonary tuberculosis". BMJ Case Rep. 2013. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-202072. PMC 3863066. PMID 24326441.
  6. Kuan YC, How SH, Yeen WC, Ng TH, Fauzi AR (2011). "Empyema thoracis complicated by pneumothorax necessitans manifesting as lobulated, localized subcutaneous emphysematous swellings". Ann Thorac Surg. 91 (6): 1969–71. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.075. PMID 21619994.
  7. Moffett BK, Panchabhai TS, Nakamatsu R, Arnold FW, Peyrani P, Wiemken T; et al. (2016). "Comparing posteroanterior with lateral and anteroposterior chest radiography in the initial detection of parapneumonic effusions". Am J Emerg Med. 34 (12): 2402–2407. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.09.021. PMID 27793503.
  8. Lin FC, Chou CW, Chang SC (2004). "Differentiating pyopneumothorax and peripheral lung abscess: chest ultrasonography". Am J Med Sci. 327 (6): 330–5. PMID 15201646.
  9. Lin FC, Chou CW, Chang SC (2004). "Differentiating pyopneumothorax and peripheral lung abscess: chest ultrasonography". Am J Med Sci. 327 (6): 330–5. PMID 15201646.
  10. Dickman E, Terentiev V, Likourezos A, Derman A, Haines L (2015). "Extension of the Thoracic Spine Sign: A New Sonographic Marker of Pleural Effusion". J Ultrasound Med. 34 (9): 1555–61. doi:10.7863/ultra.15.14.06013. PMID 26269297.
  11. Almeida FA, Eiger G (2008). "Subpulmonic effusion". Intern Med J. 38 (3): 216–7. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01619.x. PMID 18290818.
  12. Connell DG, Crothers G, Cooperberg PL (1982). "The subpulmonic pleural effusion: sonographic aspects". J Can Assoc Radiol. 33 (2): 101–3. PMID 7107669.
  13. Halvorsen RA, Thompson WM (1986). "Ascites or pleural effusion? CT and ultrasound differentiation". Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 26 (3): 201–40. PMID 3536306.
  14. Mroz RM, Korniluk M, Swidzinska E, Dzieciol J, Czaban J, Panek B; et al. (2010). "Lung mass in a 28-year-old male: a case report of a rare tumor". Eur J Med Res. 15 Suppl 2: 95–7. PMC 4360372. PMID 21147631.
  15. Torun E, Fidan A, Cağlayan B, Salepçi T, Mayadağli A, Salepçi B (2008). "[Prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer]". Tuberk Toraks. 56 (1): 22–9. PMID 18330751.
  16. Filon E, Kodur E, Cygan M (1989). "[Ultrasonographic examination of the adrenal glands for detection of lung cancer metastasis]". Nowotwory. 39 (3–4): 157–61. PMID 2700089.
  17. Baber CE, Hedlund LW, Oddson TA, Putman CE (1980). "Differentiating empyemas and peripheral pulmonary abscesses: the value of computed tomography". Radiology. 135 (3): 755–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.135.3.7384467. PMID 7384467.
  18. Stark DD, Federle MP, Goodman PC, Podrasky AE, Webb WR (1983). "Differentiating lung abscess and empyema: radiography and computed tomography". AJR Am J Roentgenol. 141 (1): 163–7. doi:10.2214/ajr.141.1.163. PMID 6602513.
  19. Kraus GJ (2007). "The split pleura sign". Radiology. 243 (1): 297–8. doi:10.1148/radiol.2431041658. PMID 17392263.
  20. Baber CE, Hedlund LW, Oddson TA, Putman CE (1980). "Differentiating empyemas and peripheral pulmonary abscesses: the value of computed tomography". Radiology. 135 (3): 755–8. doi:10.1148/radiology.135.3.7384467. PMID 7384467.
  21. Corcoran JP, Acton L, Ahmed A, Hallifax RJ, Psallidas I, Wrightson JM; et al. (2016). "Diagnostic value of radiological imaging pre- and post-drainage of pleural effusions". Respirology. 21 (2): 392–5. doi:10.1111/resp.12675. PMID 26545413.
  22. Federle MP, Mark AS, Guillaumin ES (1986). "CT of subpulmonic pleural effusions and atelectasis: criteria for differentiation from subphrenic fluid". AJR Am J Roentgenol. 146 (4): 685–9. doi:10.2214/ajr.146.4.685. PMID 3485341.
  23. Halvorsen RA, Thompson WM (1986). "Ascites or pleural effusion? CT and ultrasound differentiation". Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 26 (3): 201–40. PMID 3536306.
  24. Wolverson MK, Crepps LF, Sundaram M, Heiberg E, Vas WG, Shields JB (1983). "Hyperdensity of recent hemorrhage at body computed tomography: incidence and morphologic variation". Radiology. 148 (3): 779–84. doi:10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878700. PMID 6878700.