Intravascular device related infections: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
{{SI}}
{{SI}}


Intravascular catheters are indispensable in modern-day medical practice, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). Although such catheters provide necessary vascular access, their use puts patients at risk for local and systemic infectious complications, including local site infection, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), septic thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, and other metastatic infections (e.g., lung abscess, brain abscess, osteomyelitis, and endophthalmitis).


Intravascular catheters are indispensable in modern-day medical practice, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). Although such catheters provide necessary vascular access, their use puts patients at risk for local and systemic infectious complications, including local site infection, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), septic thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, and other metastatic infections (e.g., lung abscess, brain abscess, osteomyelitis, and endophthalmitis).
Health-care institutions purchase millions of intravascular catheters each year. The incidence of CRBSI varies considerably by type of catheter, frequency of catheter manipulation, and patient-related factors (e.g., underlying disease and acuity of illness). Peripheral venous catheters are the devices most frequently used for vascular access. Although the incidence of local or bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with peripheral venous catheters is usually low, serious infectious complications produce considerable annual morbidity because of the frequency with which such catheters are used. However, the majority of serious catheter-related infections are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs), especially those that are placed in patients in ICUs. In the ICU setting, the incidence of infection is often higher than in the less acute in-patient or ambulatory setting. In the ICU, central venous access might be needed for extended periods of time; patients can be colonized with hospital-acquired organisms; and the catheter can be manipulated multiple times per day for the administration of fluids, drugs, and blood products. Moreover, some catheters can be inserted in urgent situations, during which optimal attention to aseptic technique might not be feasible. Certain catheters (e.g., pulmonary artery catheters and peripheral arterial catheters) can be accessed multiple times per day for hemodynamic measurements or to obtain samples for laboratory analysis, augmenting the potential for contamination and subsequent clinical infection.





Revision as of 21:38, 7 January 2009

Intravascular device related infections

WikiDoc Resources for Intravascular device related infections

Articles

Most recent articles on Intravascular device related infections

Most cited articles on Intravascular device related infections

Review articles on Intravascular device related infections

Articles on Intravascular device related infections in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Intravascular device related infections

Images of Intravascular device related infections

Photos of Intravascular device related infections

Podcasts & MP3s on Intravascular device related infections

Videos on Intravascular device related infections

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Intravascular device related infections

Bandolier on Intravascular device related infections

TRIP on Intravascular device related infections

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Intravascular device related infections at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Intravascular device related infections

Clinical Trials on Intravascular device related infections at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Intravascular device related infections

NICE Guidance on Intravascular device related infections

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Intravascular device related infections

CDC on Intravascular device related infections

Books

Books on Intravascular device related infections

News

Intravascular device related infections in the news

Be alerted to news on Intravascular device related infections

News trends on Intravascular device related infections

Commentary

Blogs on Intravascular device related infections

Definitions

Definitions of Intravascular device related infections

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Intravascular device related infections

Discussion groups on Intravascular device related infections

Patient Handouts on Intravascular device related infections

Directions to Hospitals Treating Intravascular device related infections

Risk calculators and risk factors for Intravascular device related infections

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Intravascular device related infections

Causes & Risk Factors for Intravascular device related infections

Diagnostic studies for Intravascular device related infections

Treatment of Intravascular device related infections

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Intravascular device related infections

International

Intravascular device related infections en Espanol

Intravascular device related infections en Francais

Business

Intravascular device related infections in the Marketplace

Patents on Intravascular device related infections

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Intravascular device related infections

Intravascular catheters are indispensable in modern-day medical practice, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). Although such catheters provide necessary vascular access, their use puts patients at risk for local and systemic infectious complications, including local site infection, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), septic thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, and other metastatic infections (e.g., lung abscess, brain abscess, osteomyelitis, and endophthalmitis).

Health-care institutions purchase millions of intravascular catheters each year. The incidence of CRBSI varies considerably by type of catheter, frequency of catheter manipulation, and patient-related factors (e.g., underlying disease and acuity of illness). Peripheral venous catheters are the devices most frequently used for vascular access. Although the incidence of local or bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with peripheral venous catheters is usually low, serious infectious complications produce considerable annual morbidity because of the frequency with which such catheters are used. However, the majority of serious catheter-related infections are associated with central venous catheters (CVCs), especially those that are placed in patients in ICUs. In the ICU setting, the incidence of infection is often higher than in the less acute in-patient or ambulatory setting. In the ICU, central venous access might be needed for extended periods of time; patients can be colonized with hospital-acquired organisms; and the catheter can be manipulated multiple times per day for the administration of fluids, drugs, and blood products. Moreover, some catheters can be inserted in urgent situations, during which optimal attention to aseptic technique might not be feasible. Certain catheters (e.g., pulmonary artery catheters and peripheral arterial catheters) can be accessed multiple times per day for hemodynamic measurements or to obtain samples for laboratory analysis, augmenting the potential for contamination and subsequent clinical infection.


Template:SIB


Template:WikiDoc Sources