Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


=== Swan Ganz Catheter ===
=== Swan Ganz Catheter ===
The [[Swan-ganz catheter]] or [[pulmonary artery catheter]] may be helpful in distinguishing cardiogenic shock from [[septic shock]] and in optimizing the patient's left ventricular filling pressures (see section on [[Cardiogenic shock#Treatment|Treatment below)]].  The presence of significant V waves (greatly exceeding the pulmonary [[capillary wedge pressure]]) on the [[pulmonary artery]] tracing suggests either acute [[mitral regurgitation]] or a [[ventricular septal defect]].
The [[Swan-ganz catheter]] or [[pulmonary artery catheter]] has been gradually replaced by echocardiography with color Doppler throughout the years, however, it is still common pratcice in some centers. It may be performed for different situations, such as: confirm the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock following clinical evaluation, ensure adequacy of filling pressures as well as helping in possible adjustments in therapy. It may also be helpful in distinguishing cardiogenic shock from [[septic shock]] and in optimizing the patient's left ventricular filling pressures (see section on [[Cardiogenic shock#Treatment|Treatment below)]].  The presence of significant V waves (greatly exceeding the pulmonary [[capillary wedge pressure]]) on the [[pulmonary artery]] tracing suggests either acute [[mitral regurgitation]] or a [[ventricular septal defect]].


*This technique is recommended for [[MI]] patients who are severely [[hypotensive]], however, several centers are gradually switching to a less [[invasive]] approach, managing cardiogenic shock patients by their clinic complemented by [[echocardiography]], instead of using the [[PA catheter]]. <ref name="ReynoldsHochman2008">{{cite journal|last1=Reynolds|first1=H. R.|last2=Hochman|first2=J. S.|title=Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes|journal=Circulation|volume=117|issue=5|year=2008|pages=686–697|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596}}</ref><ref name="Antman2004">{{cite journal|last1=Antman|first1=E. M.|title=ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)|journal=Circulation|volume=110|issue=5|year=2004|pages=588–636|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA}}</ref>
*This technique is recommended for [[MI]] patients who are severely [[hypotensive]], however, several centers are gradually switching to a less [[invasive]] approach, managing cardiogenic shock patients by their clinic complemented by [[echocardiography]], instead of using the [[PA catheter]]. <ref name="ReynoldsHochman2008">{{cite journal|last1=Reynolds|first1=H. R.|last2=Hochman|first2=J. S.|title=Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes|journal=Circulation|volume=117|issue=5|year=2008|pages=686–697|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596}}</ref><ref name="Antman2004">{{cite journal|last1=Antman|first1=E. M.|title=ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)|journal=Circulation|volume=110|issue=5|year=2004|pages=588–636|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA}}</ref>

Revision as of 20:00, 27 May 2014

Cardiogenic Shock Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Cardiogenic shock from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies

CDC on Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies

Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Cardiogenic shock

Risk calculators and risk factors for Cardiogenic shock other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: João André Alves Silva, M.D. [2]

Other Diagnostic Studies

Swan Ganz Catheter

The Swan-ganz catheter or pulmonary artery catheter has been gradually replaced by echocardiography with color Doppler throughout the years, however, it is still common pratcice in some centers. It may be performed for different situations, such as: confirm the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock following clinical evaluation, ensure adequacy of filling pressures as well as helping in possible adjustments in therapy. It may also be helpful in distinguishing cardiogenic shock from septic shock and in optimizing the patient's left ventricular filling pressures (see section on Treatment below). The presence of significant V waves (greatly exceeding the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) on the pulmonary artery tracing suggests either acute mitral regurgitation or a ventricular septal defect.

  • This technique is recommended for MI patients who are severely hypotensive, however, several centers are gradually switching to a less invasive approach, managing cardiogenic shock patients by their clinic complemented by echocardiography, instead of using the PA catheter. [1][2]

Biopsy

In case of suspected cardiomyopathy a biopsy of heart muscle may be of benefit in establishing a definitive diagnosis.

References

  1. Reynolds, H. R.; Hochman, J. S. (2008). "Cardiogenic Shock: Current Concepts and Improving Outcomes". Circulation. 117 (5): 686–697. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596. ISSN 0009-7322.
  2. Antman, E. M. (2004). "ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction--Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)". Circulation. 110 (5): 588–636. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000134791.68010.FA. ISSN 0009-7322.


Template:WikiDoc Sources