Becker's muscular dystrophy

Revision as of 04:53, 28 May 2020 by MoisesRomo (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search


WikiDoc Resources for Becker's muscular dystrophy

Articles

Most recent articles on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Most cited articles on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Review articles on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Articles on Becker's muscular dystrophy in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Images of Becker's muscular dystrophy

Photos of Becker's muscular dystrophy

Podcasts & MP3s on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Videos on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Bandolier on Becker's muscular dystrophy

TRIP on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Becker's muscular dystrophy at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Clinical Trials on Becker's muscular dystrophy at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Becker's muscular dystrophy

NICE Guidance on Becker's muscular dystrophy

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Becker's muscular dystrophy

CDC on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Books

Books on Becker's muscular dystrophy

News

Becker's muscular dystrophy in the news

Be alerted to news on Becker's muscular dystrophy

News trends on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Commentary

Blogs on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Definitions

Definitions of Becker's muscular dystrophy

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Discussion groups on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Patient Handouts on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Becker's muscular dystrophy

Risk calculators and risk factors for Becker's muscular dystrophy

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Becker's muscular dystrophy

Causes & Risk Factors for Becker's muscular dystrophy

Diagnostic studies for Becker's muscular dystrophy

Treatment of Becker's muscular dystrophy

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Becker's muscular dystrophy

International

Becker's muscular dystrophy en Espanol

Becker's muscular dystrophy en Francais

Business

Becker's muscular dystrophy in the Marketplace

Patents on Becker's muscular dystrophy

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Becker's muscular dystrophy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Moises Romo, M.D.


Overview[edit | edit source]

Former "pseudohypertrophic muscular dystrophy", now Becker's muscular dystrophy, is a genetic neuromuscular condition characterized by slowly progresive weakness and atrophy of skeletal (mostly legs and pelvis) and cardiac muscles.

Historical Perspective[edit | edit source]

Becker's muscular dystrophy was first described by Peter Emil Becker, a German neurologist, psychiatrist and geneticist, in 1953 with his thesis called ‘‘Dystrophia Musculorum Progessiva: A Genetic and Clinical Investigation of the Muscular Dystrophies’’, after his work was interrumpted in 1942 due to WWII recruitment.

Before Becker, in the 1860's, French neurologist Guillaume Benjamin Amand Duchenne described in detail a slowly progessive muscular weakness in a boy, later known as Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

The association between genetic mutations and Duchenne muscular dystrophy was made in 1986.

In 1987, dystrophin gene on X chromosome were first implicated in the pathogenesis of Becker's muscular dystrophy.

Pathophysiology[edit | edit source]

The pathogenesis of Becker's muscular dystrophy is characterized by muscle weakness and pseudohypertrophy (mostly proximal), cardiomyopathy, elevated CK and skelletal deformities.

Becker's muscular dystrophy is inherited in an X-linked recessive fashion.

Becker's muscular dystrophy is caused by a mutation in the gene DMD, one of the largest genes in humans. This gene encodes for the 3685Y aminoacid protein called dystrophin, wich can be found in skeletal and cardiac muscle, among other tisues. This mutation produces a truncated dystrophin protein that will translate into a decreased but not incomplete functionality (difference from Duchenne). Around 33% of patients with Becker's muscular dystrophy have de novo mutations. Point mutations and duplications appear mostly from spermatogenesis while deletions arise from oogenesis in most of te cases.[1] 

On microscopic histopathological analysis, endomysial fibrosis with fatty replacement of muscle in later stages, inflammation, increased internal nuclei, myofiber cleavage with necrosis, and phagocytosis are characteristic findings of Becker's muscular dystrophy.[2]

Clinical Features[edit | edit source]

Unlike Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Becker's muscular dystrophy (BMD) phenotype presents at a later age, widely variable onset from early childhood to late adulthood, most of them falling in puberty range. Most of the patients will requiere a wheelchair after age 16.

Clinical presentation Becker's muscular dystrophy include:

There is an abcense of fasciculations, and this finding may exclude BMD[3]

CNS is rarely afected in Becker's muscular dystrophy, for this reason, intelligence is usually spared.

Most of women are asymptomatic carriers, with very rare cases presenting the classic symptoms.


Differentiating [disease name] from other Diseases[edit | edit source]

Becker's muscular dystrophy must be differentiated from other diseases that cause skelletal and cardiac muscle afection, such as:

Screening

Prenatal molecular genetic testing is recomended in couples planning to conceive and have family members who are afected by or are carriers of a dystrophinopathy.

In-utero fetal muscle biopsy has also been realized under couples request for fetuses with a high probability of beign affected and inconclusive genetic linkage.

It is important to identify females at risk to be heterozygous of a dystrophinopathy, in order to manage possible cardiac complications; this can be done by molecular genetic testing, CK measurements, and linkage analysis.


Epidemiology and Demographics[edit | edit source]

The prevalence of Becker's muscular dystrophy is approximately 1-3 per 100,000 individuals.

The incidence of Becker's muscular dystrophy is approximately 3-6 per 100,000 male births worldwide.[5][6]

Age[edit | edit source]

Becker's muscular dystrophy is diagnosed in 85% of patients by age 25.

Gender[edit | edit source]

Becker's muscular dystrophy affects mostly men, women are carriers almost exclusively (except rare situation).

Race[edit | edit source]

Becker's muscular dystrophy usually affects individuals of the hispanic race.[7]

Asian individuals are less likely to develop Becker's muscular dystrophy.[8]

Risk Factors[edit | edit source]

Becker's muscular dystrophy is developed in the majority of cases from males who are born from genetic carrier mothers or by spontaneous mutation,[9] there has not been any risk factors implicated for a DMD gene mutation.

Studies have found that several genetic polymorphisms and mutations may be a factor for Becker's muscular dystrophy progression, but further research is necessary to draw conclusions.

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis[edit | edit source]

  • The majority of patients with Becker's muscular dystrophy remain asymptomatic until adolescence.
  • Early clinical features include calf hypertrophy, difficulty rising from a chair, proximal muscle weakness, climbing stairs, sustaining balance, elevating arms, and in later stages heart failure.[10]
  • If left untreated, [#%] of patients with [disease name] may progress to develop [manifestation 1], [manifestation 2], and [manifestation 3].
  • Common complications of [disease name] include [complication 1], [complication 2], and [complication 3].
  • Prognosis is generally [excellent/good/poor], and the [1/5/10­year mortality/survival rate] of patients with [disease name] is approximately [#%].

In the early stages, Duchenne and Becker MD affect the shoulder and upper arm muscles and the muscles of the hips and thighs. These weaknesses lead to difficulty in rising from the floor, climbing stairs, maintaining balance and raising the arms.

The clinical course and natural history of MDs have dramatically changed over the recent years since advances in medical management and care of patients have been made, with treatment of complications, in particular cardiac, respiratory and orthopedic, as well as enhancement of quality of life, timely supply of aids, adaptations and access to independent living (Worman and Bonne, 2007; Bushby et al., 2010a). The same clinical care should be offered to patients independently by their geographic location and nihilistic approach should not be accepted. Use of steroids have been introduced in the treatment of DMD about a decade ago and currently represent the gold standard in DMD care, being the only currently available medication able to slow down the disease progression in terms of muscle strength and function. This also reduces risk of scoliosis, stabilizes respiratory function and improves cardiac function.

Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is characterized by later-onset skeletal muscle weakness. With improved diagnostic techniques, it has been recognized that the mild end of the spectrum includes men with onset of symptoms after age 30 years who remain ambulatory even into their 60s. Despite the milder skeletal muscle involvement, heart failure from DCM is a common cause of morbidity and the most common cause of death in BMD. Mean age of death is in the mid-40s.

Life span. Despite improvement of survival, few affected individuals survive beyond the third decade [Passamano et al 2012]. Respiratory complications and progressive cardiomyopathy are common causes of death. A study of individuals with molecularly confirmed diagnoses has determined a median survival of 24 years, with ventilated patients reaching a median survival of 27 years [Rall & Grimm 2012]. In a cohort of affected individuals having both spinal surgery and nocturnal ventilation, the median survival was 30 years [Eagle et al 2007]. Because death frequently occurs outside the hospital setting, the cause of death is often difficult to determine [Parker et al 2005].

Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

Diagnostic Criteria[edit | edit source]

  • The diagnosis of [disease name] is made when at least [number] of the following [number] diagnostic criteria are met:
  • [criterion 1]
  • [criterion 2]
  • [criterion 3]
  • [criterion 4]

Symptoms[edit | edit source]

  • [Disease name] is usually asymptomatic.
  • Symptoms of [disease name] may include the following:
  • [symptom 1]
  • [symptom 2]
  • [symptom 3]
  • [symptom 4]
  • [symptom 5]
  • [symptom 6]

Physical Examination[edit | edit source]

  • Patients with [disease name] usually appear [general appearance].
  • Physical examination may be remarkable for:
  • [finding 1]
  • [finding 2]
  • [finding 3]
  • [finding 4]
  • [finding 5]
  • [finding 6]

Laboratory Findings[edit | edit source]

  • There are no specific laboratory findings associated with [disease name].
  • A [positive/negative] [test name] is diagnostic of [disease name].
  • An [elevated/reduced] concentration of [serum/blood/urinary/CSF/other] [lab test] is diagnostic of [disease name].
  • Other laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of [disease name] include [abnormal test 1], [abnormal test 2], and [abnormal test 3].
  • Creatine kinase (CK) is significantly elevated but not to the degree seen in DMD
  • Peak CK levels are usually found around 10 - 15 years of age
  • ALT / AST may be elevated
  • Can see occasional myoglobinuria following strenuous activity


Imaging Findings[edit | edit source]

  • There are no [imaging study] findings associated with [disease name].
  • [Imaging study 1] is the imaging modality of choice for [disease name].
  • On [imaging study 1], [disease name] is characterized by [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3].
  • [Imaging study 2] may demonstrate [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3].

Other Diagnostic Studies[edit | edit source]

  • [Disease name] may also be diagnosed using [diagnostic study name].
  • Findings on [diagnostic study name] include [finding 1], [finding 2], and [finding 3].

The diagnosis of a dystrophinopathy is established in a proband with the characteristic clinical findings and elevated CK concentration and/or by identification of a hemizygous pathogenic variant in DMD on molecular genetic testing in a male and of a heterozygous pathogenic variant in DMD on molecular genetic testing in a female. Females may present with a classic dystrophinopathy or may be asymptomatic carriers.


A dystrophinopathy should be suspected in any male or female patient presenting with progressive limb-girdle weakness, especially if the patient has a positive family history, substantially elevated CK level, or cardiomyopathy. The diagnosis of DMD should be the physician’s first thought when a 3- to 5- year-old boy who is physically slower than his peers presents with toe walking, large calves, neck weakness, a partial Gower’s sign, and a CK level greater than 3000 U/L. CK levels may be elevated 10- to 200-fold. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), which are also muscle enzymes, are often elevated. This transaminitis reflects muscle involvement rather than liver disease, and this can be verified by checking the liver-specific transaminase +-glutamyltransferase (GGT), which will be normal. In DMD, DNA analysis of the dystrophin gene is the first diagnostic procedure.

In patients with BMD or in manifesting female carriers, weakness may not be as pronounced, the CK level may be lower, and the initial procedure will often be electrodiagnostic testing. The EMG reveals myopathic motor units with or without muscle membrane instability. If the patient has no family history of a dystrophinopathy, then a muscle biopsy may be performed. Immunostaining for the N-terminal, rod, and C-terminal regions of dystrophin will usually reveal diffusely decreased, or patchy, staining of some but not all muscle fiber membranes. Confirmatory testing is through DNA analysis. Mutation analysis consists of analysis for duplications and deletions via multiplex PCR or multiplex ligationdependent probe amplification. If this is negative, then gene sequencing is undertaken. Mutations in DMD causative for DMD and BMD are fairly consistent when assessed across different countries,13Y16 with the composition including 43% to 67% deletions and 9% to 11% duplications of exons, 16% to 26% point mutations, and 5% to 6% splice site mutations. Therapies allowing multiexon skipping from exons 45 through 55 would benefit more than 50% of patients with DMD. Mutations disrupting the reading frame (out-of-frame mutations) in DMD create a truncated RNA transcript that is rapidly degraded. This leads to a virtual absence of dystrophin in muscle and a DMD phenotype. Mutations with maintenance of the reading frame (in-frame mutations) generate shorter or less stable dystrophin. Dystrophin with in-frame mutations retain their amino- and carboxy-terminus domains and thus still maintain the mechanical bridge between actin and "-dystroglycan. Inframe mutations more often lead to a BMD phenotype. In a large series, out-of-frame mutations led to a DMD phenotype in nearly 90% of cases; however, in-frame mutations led to a BMD phenotype in only approximately 60% of cases (Case 2-1).13

Treatment[edit | edit source]

Medical Therapy[edit | edit source]

  • There is no treatment for [disease name]; the mainstay of therapy is supportive care.
  • The mainstay of therapy for [disease name] is [medical therapy 1] and [medical therapy 2].
  • [Medical therapy 1] acts by [mechanism of action 1].
  • Response to [medical therapy 1] can be monitored with [test/physical finding/imaging] every [frequency/duration].


No curative treatment

Physical therapy to promote mobility and prevent contractures

  • Exercise
    • All ambulatory boys with DMD or those in early non-ambulatory phase should participate in regular gentle exercise to avoid contractures and disuse atrophy.
    • Exercise can consist of a combination of swimming pool and recreation-based activities. Swimming can be continued in non-ambulatory patients under close supervision, if medically safe.
    • If patients complain of muscle pain during or after exercise, the activity should be reduced and monitoring for myoglobinuria should be carried out. Myoglobinuria within 24 hours after exercise indicates overexertion leading to rhabdomyolysis.


Surgery[edit | edit source]

  • Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for [disease name].
  • [Surgical procedure] in conjunction with [chemotherapy/radiation] is the most common approach to the treatment of [disease name].
  • [Surgical procedure] can only be performed for patients with [disease stage] [disease name].

Prevention[edit | edit source]

  • There are no primary preventive measures available for [disease name].
  • Effective measures for the primary prevention of [disease name] include [measure1], [measure2], and [measure3].
  • Once diagnosed and successfully treated, patients with [disease name] are followed-up every [duration]. Follow-up testing includes [test 1], [test 2], and [test 3].

Appropriate management of individuals with a dystrophinopathy can prolong survival and improve quality of life.


Prevention of secondary complications: Evaluation by a pulmonologist and cardiologist before surgeries; pneumococcal and influenza immunizations annually; nutrition assessment; physical therapy to promote mobility and prevent contractures; sunshine and a balanced diet rich in vitamin D and calcium to improve bone density and reduce the risk of fractures; weight control to avoid obesity.


Cardiomyopathy. Recommendations are based on an American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement and various additional publications [American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery 2005, Jefferies et al 2005, Viollet et al 2012] and apply to patients with the DMD or BMD phenotype.

  • The authors' institution commonly treats children with DMD or BMD early with an ACE inhibitor and/or beta blocker.
  • When used in combination, these appear to lead to initial improvement of left ventricular function; however, ACE inhibitors are also used without beta blockers, with similar results [Viollet et al 2012].
  • The optimal time to start treatment in DMD is unknown, but most cardiologists will initiate treatment when the left ventricle ejection fraction drops below 55% and fractional shortening is less than 28% [Jefferies et al 2005, Viollet et al 2012].
  • Angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) such as losartan are similarly effective and can be used in cases of poor tolerability of ACE inhibitors [Allen et al 2013].
  • In cases of overt heart failure, other heart failure therapies including diuretics and digoxin are used as needed.
  • Cardiac transplantation is offered to persons with severe dilated cardiomyopathy and BMD with limited or no clinical evidence of skeletal muscle disease.

Scoliosis treatment as needed is appropriate. The management of scoliosis involves bracing and surgery. Most patients end up getting a spinal fusion. The use of rods is not contraindicated; therefore, rod and bone grafts are used to fuse the spine. A minority of patients do not develop significant scoliosis and may not require a spinal fusion.

Corticosteroid therapy. Studies have shown that corticosteroids improve the muscle strength and function of individuals with DMD (see Corticosteroid Therapy in DMD). This therapy remains the treatment of choice for affected individuals between ages five and 15 years. Corticosteroid therapy is not recommended in children before age two years [Bushby et al 2010a]. This treatment is also used in BMD, although the efficacy is less clear (see BMD below).

The following published recommendations for corticosteroid therapy are in accordance with the national practice parameters developed by the American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society [Moxley et al 2005] (full text), as well as the DMD Care Considerations Working Group [Bushby et al 2010a].

  • Boys with DMD should be offered treatment with prednisone (0.75 mg/kg/day, maximum daily dose: 30-40 mg) or deflazacort (0.9 mg/kg/day, maximum daily dose: 36-39 mg) as soon as plateauing or decline in motor skills is noted, which usually occurs at age 4-8 years. Prior to the initiation of therapy, the potential benefits and risks of corticosteroid treatment should be carefully discussed with each individual.
  • To assess benefits of corticosteroid therapy, the following parameters are useful: timed muscle function tests, pulmonary function tests, and age at loss of independent ambulation.
  • To assess risks of corticosteroid therapy, maintain awareness of the potential corticosteroid therapy side effects (e.g., weight gain, cushingoid appearance, short stature, decrease in linear growth, acne, excessive hair growth, gastrointestinal symptoms, behavioral changes). There is also an increased frequency of vertebral and long bone fractures with prolonged corticosteroid use [King et al 2007].
  • The optimal maintenance dose of prednisone (0.75 mg/kg/day) or deflazacort (0.9 mg/kg/day) should be continued if side effects are not severe. Significant but less robust improvement can be seen with gradual tapering of prednisone to as low as 0.3 mg/kg/day (or ~0.4 mg/kg/day of deflazacort).
  • If excessive weight gain occurs (>20% over estimated normal weight for height over a 12-month period), the prednisone dose should be decreased by 25%-33% and reassessed in a few months. If excessive weight gain continues, the dose should be further decreased by an additional 25% to the minimum effective dose cited above after three to four months.
  • If significant weight gain or intolerable behavioral side effects occur in patients treated with prednisone, change to deflazacort on a ten-day-on / ten-day-off schedule or a high-dose weekend schedule. In patients on deflazacort, side effects of asymptomatic cataracts and weight gain should be monitored.

BMD. Information about the efficacy of prednisone in treating individuals with BMD is limited. Many clinicians continue treatment with glucocorticoids after loss of ambulation for the purpose of maintaining upper limb strength, delaying the progressive decline of respiratory and cardiac function, and decreasing the risk of scoliosis. Retrospective data suggest that the progression of scoliosis can be reduced by long-term daily corticosteroid treatment; however, an increased risk for vertebral and lower-limb fractures has been documented [King et al 2007]. Men on steroid therapy were less likely to require spinal surgery [Dooley et al 2010b]. The dose is allowed to drift down to 0.3-0.6 mg/kg/day of prednisone or deflazacort, which is still effective [Bushby et al 2010a].

References[edit | edit source]

References

{{Reflist|2}}

Template:Muscular Dystrophy it:Distrofia muscolare di Becker nl:Becker spierdystrofie no:Beckers muskeldystrofi fi:Beckerin lihasdystrofia


Template:WikiDoc Sources

  1. Deconinck N, Dan B (2007). "Pathophysiology of duchenne muscular dystrophy: current hypotheses". Pediatr Neurol. 36 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2006.09.016. PMID 17162189.
  2. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6