Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms
|
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidelines Microchapters |
|
PCI Approaches: |
|---|
|
CAD Revascularization: |
|
Pre-procedural Considerations: |
|
Procedural Considerations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Procedural Considerations: |
|
Quality and Performance Considerations: |
|
Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms On the Web |
|
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms |
|
FDA on Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms |
|
CDC on Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms |
|
Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms in the news |
|
Blogs on Percutaneous coronary intervention revascularization to improve symptoms |
|
Directions to Hospitals Treating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
2011 ACCF/AHA Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Revascularization to Improve Symptoms (DO NOT EDIT)[1]
| Class I |
|
"1. CABG or PCI to improve symptoms is beneficial in patients with 1 or more significant (greater than 70% diameter) coronary artery stenoses amenable to revascularization and unacceptable angina despite guideline-directed medical therapy. (Level of Evidence: A)" |
| Class III (Harm) |
|
"1. CABG or PCI to improve symptoms should not be performed in patients who do not meet anatomic (greater than 50% left main or greater than 70% non–left main stenosis) or physiological (e.g., abnormal fractional flow reserve) criteria for revascularization. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
| Class IIa |
|
"1. CABG or PCI to improve symptoms is reasonable in patients with 1 or more significant (greater than 70% diameter) coronary artery stenoses and unacceptable angina for whom guideline-directed medical therapy cannot be implemented because of medication contraindications, adverse effects, or patient preferences. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
|
"2. PCI to improve symptoms is reasonable in patients with previous CABG, 1 or more significant (greater than 70% diameter) coronary artery stenoses associated with ischemia, and unacceptable anginadespite guideline-directed medical therapy. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
|
"3. It is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI to improve symptoms in patients with complex 3-vessel CAD (e.g.,SYNTAX score greater than 22), with or without involvement of the proximal LAD artery who are good candidates for CABG. (Level of Evidence: B)" |
| Class IIb |
|
"1. CABG to improve symptoms might be reasonable for patients with previous CABG, 1 or more significant (greater than 70% diameter) coronary artery stenoses not amenable to PCI, and unacceptable angina despite guideline-directed medical therapy. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
References
- ↑ Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B; et al. (2011). "2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions". Circulation. 124 (23): 2574–609. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823a5596. PMID 22064598.