AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ischemic Stroke Microchapters

Main Stroke Page

Transient ischemic attack

Hemorrhagic Stroke Page

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Stroke from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

CT

MRI

Echocardiography

Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Treatment

Early Assessment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Rehabilitation

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

AHA/ASA Guidelines for Stroke

Case Studies

Case #1

AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

CDC on AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack in the news

Blogs on AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

Directions to Hospitals Treating Stroke

Risk calculators and risk factors for AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aysha Anwar, M.B.B.S[2]

AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack

Definition

Arguments in favour of definition

Class III
"1." A 24-hour duration of symptoms does not accurately demarcate patients with and without tissue infarction. (Level of Evidence:A ) "
"2." The frequency distribution of durations of transiently symptomatic cerebral ischemic events shows no special relationship to the 24-hour time point.(Level of Evidence:A ) "
Class I
"1." Defining TIA with a 24-hour maximum duration has the potential to delay the initiation of effective stroke therapies(Level of Evidence:C ) "
Class IIa
"1."A tissue-based definition of TIA will harmonize cerebrovascular nosology with other ischemic conditions and appropriately direct diagnostic attention to identifying the cause of ischemia and whether brain injury occurred.(Level of Evidence:C ) "

Arguments against the new definition

Class IIb
"1."(Level of Evidence:) "
"2."(Level of Evidence:) "

References

Template:WS Template:WH