AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack
< AHA
Ischemic Stroke Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack |
FDA on AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack |
CDC on AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack |
AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack in the news |
Blogs on AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Aysha Anwar, M.B.B.S[2]
AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack
Definition
Arguments in favour of definition
Class III |
"1." A 24-hour duration of symptoms does not accurately demarcate patients with and without tissue infarction. (Level of Evidence:A ) " |
"2." The frequency distribution of durations of transiently symptomatic cerebral ischemic events shows no special relationship to the 24-hour time point.(Level of Evidence:A ) " |
Class I |
"1." Defining TIA with a 24-hour maximum duration has the potential to delay the initiation of effective stroke therapies(Level of Evidence:C ) " |
Class IIa |
"1."A tissue-based definition of TIA will harmonize cerebrovascular nosology with other ischemic conditions and appropriately direct diagnostic attention to identifying the cause of ischemia and whether brain injury occurred.(Level of Evidence:C ) " |
Arguments against the new definition
Class IIb |
"1."(Level of Evidence:) " |
"2."(Level of Evidence:) " |