Atrial septal defect echocardiography modalities
{Atrial septal defect}} Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2], Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Kristin Feeney, B.S. [4]
For a full discussion on the usage of echocardiography for atrial septal defect diagnosis click here.
Overview
Echocardiography is the preferred diagnostic tool in the evaluation of an atrial septal defect. A range of techniques may be employed to definitively image and diagnose the nature of an atrial septal defect. These include modalities such as: M-mode, trans-thoracic, trans-esophageal, contrast, and Doppler.
Echocardiography Techniques for ASD
A range of echocardiography techniques can be used to visualize and diagnose a suspected atrial septal defect. Each technique offers additional imaging information to support an atrial septal defect diagnosis.
M-mode
- Effective modality for imaging moderate to large ostium secundum atrial septal defects
- Provides imaging of:
- Right ventricular enlargement
- Paradoxical motion involving the interventricular septum
Disadvantages
- M-mode modality can appear indicative of right ventricular overload. It is not substantial enough alone to make a full diagnosis of a suspected atrial septal defect.
Trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE)
Contrast echocardiography
Doppler
- Used to demonstrate left to right flow.
- Effective modality for:
- Confirmation of a suspected atrial septal defect
- Estimation of the defect size
- Determination of the universal direction of flow across the septum
- Determination of the usage of percutaneous closure and surgical therapies
- Determination of high velocity flow, useful in patients with restrictive defects, obstructed pulmonary venous return and/or left atrial hypertension
Disadvantages
- May show false positive shunting as caval flow and incorrectly set gain may appear as left to right flow.
- Coloring across the interatrial septum can distort the perception of the shunt flow
- Not effective in determination of sinus venosus defects