Clinical prediction rule: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
| [[The GRACE risk score]]
| [[The GRACE risk score]]
| style="text-align:center"| For risk of death in [[NSTEMI]]
| style="text-align:center"| For risk of death in [[NSTEMI]]
|-
| Goldman algorithm <ref name="pmid3280998">{{cite journal |author=Goldman L, Cook EF, Brand DA, Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, Acampora D, Stasiulewicz C, Walshon J, Terranova G |title=A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=318 |issue=13 |pages=797–803 |year=1988 |month=March |pmid=3280998 |doi=10.1056/NEJM198803313181301 |url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJM198803313181301?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed |accessdate=2012-05-15}}</ref>
| To predict the likelihood that a patient has a [[myocardial infarction]].
|-
|-
|[[CHADS2]]  
|[[CHADS2]]  

Revision as of 14:29, 15 May 2012

WikiDoc Resources for Clinical prediction rule

Articles

Most recent articles on Clinical prediction rule

Most cited articles on Clinical prediction rule

Review articles on Clinical prediction rule

Articles on Clinical prediction rule in N Eng J Med, Lancet, BMJ

Media

Powerpoint slides on Clinical prediction rule

Images of Clinical prediction rule

Photos of Clinical prediction rule

Podcasts & MP3s on Clinical prediction rule

Videos on Clinical prediction rule

Evidence Based Medicine

Cochrane Collaboration on Clinical prediction rule

Bandolier on Clinical prediction rule

TRIP on Clinical prediction rule

Clinical Trials

Ongoing Trials on Clinical prediction rule at Clinical Trials.gov

Trial results on Clinical prediction rule

Clinical Trials on Clinical prediction rule at Google

Guidelines / Policies / Govt

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Clinical prediction rule

NICE Guidance on Clinical prediction rule

NHS PRODIGY Guidance

FDA on Clinical prediction rule

CDC on Clinical prediction rule

Books

Books on Clinical prediction rule

News

Clinical prediction rule in the news

Be alerted to news on Clinical prediction rule

News trends on Clinical prediction rule

Commentary

Blogs on Clinical prediction rule

Definitions

Definitions of Clinical prediction rule

Patient Resources / Community

Patient resources on Clinical prediction rule

Discussion groups on Clinical prediction rule

Patient Handouts on Clinical prediction rule

Directions to Hospitals Treating Clinical prediction rule

Risk calculators and risk factors for Clinical prediction rule

Healthcare Provider Resources

Symptoms of Clinical prediction rule

Causes & Risk Factors for Clinical prediction rule

Diagnostic studies for Clinical prediction rule

Treatment of Clinical prediction rule

Continuing Medical Education (CME)

CME Programs on Clinical prediction rule

International

Clinical prediction rule en Espanol

Clinical prediction rule en Francais

Business

Clinical prediction rule in the Marketplace

Patents on Clinical prediction rule

Experimental / Informatics

List of terms related to Clinical prediction rule

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview

A clinical prediction rule is type of medical research study in which researchers try to identify the best combination of medical sign, symptoms, and other findings in predicting the probability of a specific disease or outcome.[1]

Physicians have difficulty in estimated risks of diseases; frequently erring towards overestimation[2], perhaps due to cognitive biases such as base rate fallacy in which the risk of an adverse outcome is exaggerated.

Methods

In a prediction rule study, investigators identify a consecutive group of patients who are suspected of a having a specific disease or outcome. The investigators then compare the value of clinical findings available to the physician versus the results of more intensive testing or the results of delayed clinical follow up.

Effect on health outcomes

Few prediction rules have had the consequences of their usage by physicians quantified.[3]

When studied, the impact of providing the information alone (for example, providing the calculated probability of disease) has been negative.[4][5]

However, when the prediction rule is implemented as part of a critical pathway, so that a hospital or clinic has procedures and policies established for how to manage patients identified as high or low risk of disease, the prediction rule has more impact on clinical outcomes.[6]

The more intensively the prediction rule is implemented the more benefit will occur.[7]

Examples of prediction rules

Rules predicting the probability of a disease.
Risk Score Purpose
Cardiovascular diseases
TIMI risk score Unstable Angina
TIMI risk score STEMI
The GRACE risk score For risk of death in NSTEMI
Goldman algorithm [8] To predict the likelihood that a patient has a myocardial infarction.
CHADS2 Risk of stroke with AFIB
HAS-BLED Bleeding risk stratification score for those on oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation.
Wells score Pulmonary embolism
Vancouver chest pain rule [9] For early discharge of patients with chest pain.
North American Chest Pain Rule [10] For early discharge of patients with chest pain.
Schnabel et al [11] Framingham Heart Study [2] 10 years risk of Atrial fibrillation
Pencina et al [12] Framingham Heart Study [3] 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease.
Wilson et al [13] Framingham Heart Study [4] 10-year risk of coronary heart disease.
Parikh et al [14] Framingham Heart Study [5] Hypertension Risk Score
Murabito et al [15] Framingham Heart Study [6] Intermittent claudication
D'Agostino et al [16] Framingham Heart Study [7] Risk of stroke
Wang et al [17] Framingham Heart Study [8] Stroke after Atrial fibrillation
Wang et al [17] Framingham Heart Study [9] Stroke or death after Atrial fibrillation.
Gastroentestinal diseases
Ranson criteria To predict the severity of acute pancreatitis.
Tygerberg score To diffrentiate tuberculosis as a cause of pericarditis.
Orthopedic diseases
QFracture score Osteoporosis [10]
Ottawa ankle rules To decide for offering Xray to patient with foot or ankle pain.
Rules predicting complications in diseased patients
Pneumonia severity index To calculate the probability of morbidityand mortality among patients with community acquired pneumonia.
CURB-65 To predict mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.
MELD To assess the severity of chronic liver disease.
Apnea-hypopnea index To assess the overall severity of sleep apnea.
Amar et al [18] To calculate pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery for primary Lung Cancer

References

  1. McGinn TG, Guyatt GH, Wyer PC, Naylor CD, Stiell IG, Richardson WS (2000). "Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group". JAMA. 284 (1): 79–84. PMID 10872017.
  2. Friedmann PD, Brett AS, Mayo-Smith MF (1996). "Differences in generalists' and cardiologists' perceptions of cardiovascular risk and the outcomes of preventive therapy in cardiovascular disease". Ann. Intern. Med. 124 (4): 414–21. PMID 8554250.
  3. Reilly BM, Evans AT (2006). "Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions". Ann. Intern. Med. 144 (3): 201–9. PMID 16461965.
  4. Lee TH, Pearson SD, Johnson PA; et al. (1995). "Failure of information as an intervention to modify clinical management. A time-series trial in patients with acute chest pain". Ann. Intern. Med. 122 (6): 434–7. PMID 7856992.
  5. Poses RM, Cebul RD, Wigton RS (1995). "You can lead a horse to water--improving physicians' knowledge of probabilities may not affect their decisions". Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 15 (1): 65–75. PMID 7898300.
  6. Marrie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, Wong CJ, Vandervoort MK, Feagan BG (2000). "A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin". JAMA. 283 (6): 749–55. PMID 10683053.
  7. Yealy DM, Auble TE, Stone RA; et al. (2005). "Effect of increasing the intensity of implementing pneumonia guidelines: a randomized, controlled trial". Ann. Intern. Med. 143 (12): 881–94. PMID 16365469.
  8. Goldman L, Cook EF, Brand DA, Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, Acampora D, Stasiulewicz C, Walshon J, Terranova G (1988). "A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain". N. Engl. J. Med. 318 (13): 797–803. doi:10.1056/NEJM198803313181301. PMID 3280998. Retrieved 2012-05-15. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. Christenson J, Innes G, McKnight D, Thompson CR, Wong H, Yu E, Boychuk B, Grafstein E, Rosenberg F, Gin K, Anis A, Singer J (2006). "A clinical prediction rule for early discharge of patients with chest pain". Ann Emerg Med. 47 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.007. PMID 16387209. Retrieved 2012-05-15. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  10. Hess EP, Wells GA, Jaffe A, Stiell IG (2008). "A study to derive a clinical decision rule for triage of emergency department patients with chest pain: design and methodology". BMC Emerg Med. 8: 3. doi:10.1186/1471-227X-8-3. PMC 2275746. PMID 18254973. Retrieved 2012-05-15.
  11. Schnabel RB, Sullivan LM, Levy D, Pencina MJ, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB, Newton-Cheh C, Yamamoto JF, Magnani JW, Tadros TM, Kannel WB, Wang TJ, Ellinor PT, Wolf PA, Vasan RS, Benjamin EJ (2009). "Development of a risk score for atrial fibrillation (Framingham Heart Study): a community-based cohort study". Lancet. 373 (9665): 739–45. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60443-8. PMC 2764235. PMID 19249635. Retrieved 2012-05-14. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Larson MG, Massaro JM, Vasan RS (2009). "Predicting the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease: the framingham heart study". Circulation. 119 (24): 3078–84. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.816694. PMC 2748236. PMID 19506114. Retrieved 2012-05-14. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  13. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB (1998). "Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories". Circulation. 97 (18): 1837–47. PMID 9603539. Retrieved 2012-05-14. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  14. Parikh NI, Pencina MJ, Wang TJ, Benjamin EJ, Lanier KJ, Levy D, D'Agostino RB, Kannel WB, Vasan RS (2008). "A risk score for predicting near-term incidence of hypertension: the Framingham Heart Study". Ann. Intern. Med. 148 (2): 102–10. PMID 18195335. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  15. Murabito JM, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Wilson WF (1997). "Intermittent claudication. A risk profile from The Framingham Heart Study". Circulation. 96 (1): 44–9. PMID 9236415. Retrieved 2012-05-14. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  16. D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB (1994). "Stroke risk profile: adjustment for antihypertensive medication. The Framingham Study". Stroke. 25 (1): 40–3. PMID 8266381. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  17. 17.0 17.1 Wang TJ, Massaro JM, Levy D, Vasan RS, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Benjamin EJ (2003). "A risk score for predicting stroke or death in individuals with new-onset atrial fibrillation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study". JAMA. 290 (8): 1049–56. doi:10.1001/jama.290.8.1049. PMID 12941677. Retrieved 2012-05-14. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  18. Amar D, Munoz D, Shi W, Zhang H, Thaler HT (2010). "A clinical prediction rule for pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery for primary lung cancer". Anesth. Analg. 110 (5): 1343–8. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bf5c99. PMID 19861366. Retrieved 2012-05-14. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Template:WS