Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ {{Second degree AV block}} Please help WikiDoc by adding content here. It's easy! Click here to learn about editing. ==References==...")
 
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Second degree AV block}}
{{Second degree AV block}}
{{CMG}}; {{AE}} {{Sara.Zand}}


Please help WikiDoc by adding content hereIt's easyClick [[Help:How_to_Edit_a_Page|here]]  to learn about editing.
==Overview==
[[Electrocardiographic monitoring]] can be used to identify the changes in [[QRS]] morphology such as alternating [[bundle branch block]] in the presence of [[atrioventricular conduction abnormalities]]. Also,[[Treadmill exercise stress testing]] may be diagnostic to differentiate that 2:1 atrioventricular block is Mobitz type I or II in some cases or identify the presence of [[infranodal]] disease. In addition, [[EPS]] may be helpful to determine the  anatomic site of [[block]] in [[mobitz type 2]] [[atrioventricular block]] including [[atrioventricular node]], [[intra-His]], or [[infra-His]]. Worsening [[atrioventricular  block]]  with  [[isoproterenol]] and [[atropine]] may be suggestive of [[infranodal  block]]. However, improvement of [[atrioventricular conduction]]  with [[carotid  sinus  massage]]  may  be  observed in [[patients]] with [[infranodal]] [[atrioventricular block]].
 
==Other diagnostic studies==
 
{| style="cellpadding=0; cellspacing= 0; width: 600px;"
|-
| style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #4682B4; color: #FFFFFF;" align=center |'''Additional testing for management of bradycardia associated atrioventricular block'''
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[ Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIa , Level of Evidence B]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring]] is recommended in [[patients]] with [[first degree AV block]], or mobitz type 1 [[second degree AV block]] to establish the correlation between [[symptoms]] related to bradycardia ([[lightheadness]], [[syncope]]) and [[atrioventricular block]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |''' [[Exercise treadmill test]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIa , Level of Evidence C]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑ [[Exercise treadmill test]] is reasonable in [[patients]] with [[first degree AV block]] or mobitz type 1 [[second degree AV block]] in resting [[ECG]] who have [[chest pain]] or [[shortness of breath]] during [[exercise]] to identify the benefit of [[permanent pacing]]<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Electrophysiologic study]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIb , Level of Evidence B]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑[[EPS]] may be considered in selective [[patients]] with [[second degree AV block]] to determine the level of block<br>
|-
|style="font-size: 100; padding: 0 5px; background: #B8B8B8" align=left |'''[[Pharmacologic challenge tests]] ([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme|Class IIb , Level of Evidence C]]):'''
|-
|style="padding: 0 5px; font-size: 100%; background: #F5F5F5; width: 70%" align=left|
❑[[Atropine]], [[procainamide]], [[isoproternole]], [[carotide sinus massage]] may be used in selected [[patients]] with [[second degree AV  block]] to determine the level of block and benefit from [[permanent pacing]]<br>
|-
<br>
|}
<br>
{|
! colspan="2" style="background: PapayaWhip;" align="center" + |The above table adopted from 2018 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline<ref name="KusumotoSchoenfeld2019">{{cite journal|last1=Kusumoto|first1=Fred M.|last2=Schoenfeld|first2=Mark H.|last3=Barrett|first3=Coletta|last4=Edgerton|first4=James R.|last5=Ellenbogen|first5=Kenneth A.|last6=Gold|first6=Michael R.|last7=Goldschlager|first7=Nora F.|last8=Hamilton|first8=Robert M.|last9=Joglar|first9=José A.|last10=Kim|first10=Robert J.|last11=Lee|first11=Richard|last12=Marine|first12=Joseph E.|last13=McLeod|first13=Christopher J.|last14=Oken|first14=Keith R.|last15=Patton|first15=Kristen K.|last16=Pellegrini|first16=Cara N.|last17=Selzman|first17=Kimberly A.|last18=Thompson|first18=Annemarie|last19=Varosy|first19=Paul D.|title=2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society|journal=Circulation|volume=140|issue=8|year=2019|issn=0009-7322|doi=10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628}}</ref>
|-
|}
 
 
 
===Notes===
*[[Electrocardiographic monitoring]] can be used to identify the changes in [[QRS]] morphology such as alternating [[bundle branch block]].
* Mobitz type1 [[atrioventricular block]] is much more associated with narrow [[QRS]] morphology and mobitz type 2 [[atrioventricular block]]  usually has [[wide ]] [[QRS]] morphology'
* In some cases, mobitz type 1 [[atrioventricular block]] and [[narrow]] [[QRS]] complex contributes with infranodal [[atrioventricular block]].
* Event monitors, worn for 30 to 90 days, and [[ICDs]], which can be left in place for >2 years, tend to have greater diagnostic results than 24-48 hour ambulatory [[electrocardiographic monitoring]].<ref name="pmid12867227">{{cite journal |vauthors=Sivakumaran S, Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Finan J, Yee R, Renner S, Skanes AC |title=A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope |journal=Am J Med |volume=115 |issue=1 |pages=1–5 |date=July 2003 |pmid=12867227 |doi=10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00233-x |url=}}</ref>
* [[Treadmill exercise stress testing]] can be used to identify the development of [[atrioventricular block]] in the presence of [[ischemia]].<ref name="pmid11703999">{{cite journal |vauthors=Barold SS |title=Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block |journal=Am J Cardiol |volume=88 |issue=9 |pages=1018–20 |date=November 2001 |pmid=11703999 |doi=10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01980-4 |url=}}</ref>
* [[Treadmill exercise stress testing]] may be diagnostic to differentiate  that 2:1 atrioventricular block is Mobitz type I or II or identify the presence of [[infranodal]] disease.<ref name="pmid1191459">{{cite journal |vauthors=Bakst A, Goldberg B, Schamroth L |title=Significance of exercise-induced second degree atrioventricular block |journal=Br Heart J |volume=37 |issue=9 |pages=984–6 |date=September 1975 |pmid=1191459 |pmc=482908 |doi=10.1136/hrt.37.9.984 |url=}}</ref>
* Commonly, high-degree [[atrioventricular block]] is generally considered to be intra- or infra-Hisian.
* In rare cases (at night, with accompanying [[sinus]] slowing), [[high-grade AV block ]] is due to increased [[vagal]] tone especially in the presence of narrow [[QRS]] complex.
* [[Exercise]] causes [[vagal]] withdrawal and increased [[sympathetic]] tone leading to improved [[atrioventricular nodal conduction]].
* [[Exercise]]  may worsen [[atrioventricular block]] by increased [[heart rate]] in the setting of [[infranodal]] [[atrioventricular block]].<ref name="pmid1191459">{{cite journal |vauthors=Bakst A, Goldberg B, Schamroth L |title=Significance of exercise-induced second degree atrioventricular block |journal=Br Heart J |volume=37 |issue=9 |pages=984–6 |date=September 1975 |pmid=1191459 |pmc=482908 |doi=10.1136/hrt.37.9.984 |url=}}</ref>
* In the presence of [[bundle  branch  block]] or [[hemiblock]] on resting [[ECG]], suspicion  of episodic  high-grade or complete  [[atrioventricular  block]] may raise.
* [[Electrophysiologic study]] may be helpful to determine the  anatomic site of [[block]] in [[mobitz type 2]] [[atrioventricular block]] including [[atrioventricular node]], [[intra-His]], or [[infra-His]].<ref name="pmid7019962">{{cite journal |vauthors=Fisher JD |title=Role of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with known and suspected bradycardias and tachycardias |journal=Prog Cardiovasc Dis |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=25–90 |date=1981 |pmid=7019962 |doi=10.1016/0033-0620(81)90026-8 |url=}}</ref>
* The site of block  In 70% of cases of 2:1 [[atrioventricular block]] with [[bundle  branch  block]] is  infranodal block, however, 15% to 20% of these [[patients]] can have block in  the  [[atrioventricular  node]].<ref name="pmid378457">{{cite journal |vauthors=Zipes DP |title=Second-degree atrioventricular block |journal=Circulation |volume=60 |issue=3 |pages=465–72 |date=September 1979 |pmid=378457 |doi=10.1161/01.cir.60.3.465 |url=}}</ref> 
* [[EPS]] can also determine the [[bradycardia]] due to [[extrasystole]] which is similar to [[atrioventricular block]] on resting [[ECG]].
* [[Carotid sinus massage]] is useful to determine the type of [[atrioventricular block]] When 2:1 [[atrioventricular block]] or Mobitz type I [[atrioventricular]] block in the setting of a [[wide QRS complex]] can not be differentiated on resting [[ECG]]. 
* Use of [[procainamide]] in [[patients]] with [[bifascicular block]] was associated with prolonged H-V interval indicating [[infranodal atrioventricular block]]. <ref name="pmid2462213">{{cite journal |vauthors=Twidale N, Heddle WF, Tonkin AM |title=Procainamide administration during electrophysiology study--utility as a provocative test for intermittent atrioventricular block |journal=Pacing Clin Electrophysiol |volume=11 |issue=10 |pages=1388–97 |date=October 1988 |pmid=2462213 |doi= |url=}}</ref>
* [[Atropine]] may improve or have no change in [[atrioventricular conduction block]] if the block is at the level of the [[atrioventricular node]]  but may worsen  [[atrioventricular]] conduction block in the presence of [[intra-His]] or distal conduction disease.<ref name="pmid7064840">{{cite journal |vauthors=Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A |title=Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration |journal=Am J Cardiol |volume=49 |issue=5 |pages=1136–45 |date=April 1982 |pmid=7064840 |doi=10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6 |url=}}</ref>
* [[Isoproterenol]]  is useful to determine the underlying [[pathologic]] [[His-Purkinje disease]] by enhancing  [[atrioventricular]]  nodal and [[sinus conduction]] and  precipitating [[heart  block]] with faster [[heart  rates]].
* Worsening [[atrioventricular  block]]  with  [[isoproterenol]] and [[atropine]] may be suggestive of [[infranodal  block]].
*Improvement of [[atrioventricular conduction]]  with [[carotid  sinus  massage]]  may  be  observed in [[patients]] with [[infranodal]] [[atrioventricular block]].<ref name="pmid7064840">{{cite journal |vauthors=Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A |title=Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration |journal=Am J Cardiol |volume=49 |issue=5 |pages=1136–45 |date=April 1982 |pmid=7064840 |doi=10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6 |url=}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 10:28, 25 July 2021

Second degree AV block Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Second degree AV block from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

EKG Examples

Chest X Ray

Echocardiography

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

CDC on Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Second degree AV block

Risk calculators and risk factors for Second degree AV block other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2]

Overview

Electrocardiographic monitoring can be used to identify the changes in QRS morphology such as alternating bundle branch block in the presence of atrioventricular conduction abnormalities. Also,Treadmill exercise stress testing may be diagnostic to differentiate that 2:1 atrioventricular block is Mobitz type I or II in some cases or identify the presence of infranodal disease. In addition, EPS may be helpful to determine the anatomic site of block in mobitz type 2 atrioventricular block including atrioventricular node, intra-His, or infra-His. Worsening atrioventricular block with isoproterenol and atropine may be suggestive of infranodal block. However, improvement of atrioventricular conduction with carotid sinus massage may be observed in patients with infranodal atrioventricular block.

Other diagnostic studies


Additional testing for management of bradycardia associated atrioventricular block
Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (Class IIa , Level of Evidence B):

Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring is recommended in patients with first degree AV block, or mobitz type 1 second degree AV block to establish the correlation between symptoms related to bradycardia (lightheadness, syncope) and atrioventricular block

Exercise treadmill test (Class IIa , Level of Evidence C):

Exercise treadmill test is reasonable in patients with first degree AV block or mobitz type 1 second degree AV block in resting ECG who have chest pain or shortness of breath during exercise to identify the benefit of permanent pacing

Electrophysiologic study (Class IIb , Level of Evidence B):

EPS may be considered in selective patients with second degree AV block to determine the level of block

Pharmacologic challenge tests (Class IIb , Level of Evidence C):

Atropine, procainamide, isoproternole, carotide sinus massage may be used in selected patients with second degree AV block to determine the level of block and benefit from permanent pacing


The above table adopted from 2018 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline[1]


Notes

References

  1. Kusumoto, Fred M.; Schoenfeld, Mark H.; Barrett, Coletta; Edgerton, James R.; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.; Gold, Michael R.; Goldschlager, Nora F.; Hamilton, Robert M.; Joglar, José A.; Kim, Robert J.; Lee, Richard; Marine, Joseph E.; McLeod, Christopher J.; Oken, Keith R.; Patton, Kristen K.; Pellegrini, Cara N.; Selzman, Kimberly A.; Thompson, Annemarie; Varosy, Paul D. (2019). "2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society". Circulation. 140 (8). doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. ISSN 0009-7322.
  2. Sivakumaran S, Krahn AD, Klein GJ, Finan J, Yee R, Renner S, Skanes AC (July 2003). "A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope". Am J Med. 115 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00233-x. PMID 12867227.
  3. Barold SS (November 2001). "Lingering misconceptions about type I second-degree atrioventricular block". Am J Cardiol. 88 (9): 1018–20. doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01980-4. PMID 11703999.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Bakst A, Goldberg B, Schamroth L (September 1975). "Significance of exercise-induced second degree atrioventricular block". Br Heart J. 37 (9): 984–6. doi:10.1136/hrt.37.9.984. PMC 482908. PMID 1191459.
  5. Fisher JD (1981). "Role of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with known and suspected bradycardias and tachycardias". Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 24 (1): 25–90. doi:10.1016/0033-0620(81)90026-8. PMID 7019962.
  6. Zipes DP (September 1979). "Second-degree atrioventricular block". Circulation. 60 (3): 465–72. doi:10.1161/01.cir.60.3.465. PMID 378457.
  7. Twidale N, Heddle WF, Tonkin AM (October 1988). "Procainamide administration during electrophysiology study--utility as a provocative test for intermittent atrioventricular block". Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 11 (10): 1388–97. PMID 2462213.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Mangiardi LM, Bonamini R, Conte M, Gaita F, Orzan F, Presbitero P, Brusca A (April 1982). "Bedside evaluation of atrioventricular block with narrow QRS complexes: usefulness of carotid sinus massage and atropine administration". Am J Cardiol. 49 (5): 1136–45. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90037-6. PMID 7064840.


Template:WikiDoc Sources