Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Carotid stenosis is usually diagnosed by [[ultrasound]] scan of the neck arteries. This is the first imaging option and usually used for follow up and observation as it involves no radiation and no contrast agents that may cause [[allergic]] reactions. | Carotid stenosis is usually diagnosed by [[ultrasound]] scan of the neck arteries. This is the first imaging option and usually used for follow up and observation as it involves no radiation and no contrast agents that may cause [[allergic]] reactions. | ||
== | ==Echocardiography or Ultrasound== | ||
* Carotid duplex ultrasound is the test of choice to evaluate carotid disease. | * [[Carotid]] [[duplex ultrasound]] is the test of choice to evaluate carotid disease. | ||
* Grading: | * Grading: | ||
** Mild - < 40% stenosis | ** Mild - < 40% [[stenosis]] | ||
** Moderate - 40 - 69% stenosis | ** Moderate - 40 - 69% stenosis | ||
** Severe - 70 - 99% stenosis | ** Severe - 70 - 99% stenosis | ||
==Ultrasound Criteria for Carotid Artery Stenosis== | === Ultrasound Criteria for Carotid Artery Stenosis === | ||
*Normal: | *Normal: | ||
**ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/sec and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible sonographically. | **ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/sec and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible sonographically. | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
**No detectable patent lumen at gray-scale US and no flow with spectral, power, and color Doppler US. <ref>Edward G. Grant, Carol B. Benson, Gregory L. Moneta, Andrei V. Alexandrov, J. Dennis Baker, Edward I. Bluth, Barbara A. Carroll, Michael Eliasziw, John Gocke, Barbara S. Hertzberg, Sandra Katanick, Laurence Needleman, John Pellerito, Joseph F. Polak, Kenneth S. Rholl, Douglas L. Wooster, and Eugene Zierler. [http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/2292030516v1 Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference.] Radiology published online September 18, 2003.</ref> | **No detectable patent lumen at gray-scale US and no flow with spectral, power, and color Doppler US. <ref>Edward G. Grant, Carol B. Benson, Gregory L. Moneta, Andrei V. Alexandrov, J. Dennis Baker, Edward I. Bluth, Barbara A. Carroll, Michael Eliasziw, John Gocke, Barbara S. Hertzberg, Sandra Katanick, Laurence Needleman, John Pellerito, Joseph F. Polak, Kenneth S. Rholl, Douglas L. Wooster, and Eugene Zierler. [http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/2292030516v1 Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference.] Radiology published online September 18, 2003.</ref> | ||
==Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Duplex Ultrasonography to Evaluate Asymptomatic Patients With Known or Suspected Carotid Stenosis<ref name="pmid21282505">{{cite journal| author=Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL et al.| title=2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. | journal=Circulation | year= 2011 | volume= 124 | issue= 4 | pages= 489-532 | pmid=21282505 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21282505 }} </ref> | ==Examples== | ||
<div align="left"> | |||
<gallery heights="175" widths="175"> | |||
Image:Carotid-artery-stenosis-001.jpg | |||
Image:Carotid-artery-stenosis-002.jpg | |||
Image:Carotid-artery-stenosis-003.jpg | |||
</gallery> | |||
</div> | |||
{{#ev:youtube|nkCmbY_oLAo}} | |||
==2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS: Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease (DO NOT EDIT)<ref name="pmid21282505">{{cite journal| author=Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL et al.| title=2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. | journal=Circulation | year= 2011 | volume= 124 | issue= 4 | pages= 489-532 | pmid=21282505 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21282505 }} </ref>== | |||
===Duplex Ultrasonography to Evaluate Asymptomatic Patients With Known or Suspected Carotid Stenosis (DO NOT EDIT)<ref name="pmid21282505">{{cite journal| author=Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL et al.| title=2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. | journal=Circulation | year= 2011 | volume= 124 | issue= 4 | pages= 489-532 | pmid=21282505 | doi=10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=21282505 }} </ref>=== | |||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
Line 39: | Line 53: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| bgcolor="LightGreen"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' In asymptomatic patients with known or suspected carotid stenosis, duplex ultrasonography, performed by a qualified technologist in a certified laboratory, is recommended as the initial test to detect hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis. (Level of Evidence: C)'' <nowiki>"</nowiki> | | bgcolor="LightGreen"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' In asymptomatic patients with known or suspected [[carotid stenosis]], [[duplex ultrasonography]], performed by a qualified technologist in a certified laboratory, is recommended as the initial test to detect [[hemodynamically]] significant carotid stenosis. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|} | |} | ||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LightCoral"|[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class III]] | |colspan="1" style="text-align:center; background:LightCoral"|[[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Classification of Recommendations|Class III]] (No Benefit) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' | |bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' Carotid duplex [[ultrasonography]] is not recommended for routine screening of asymptomatic patients who have no clinical manifestations of or risk factors for [[atherosclerosis]]. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' | |bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' Carotid [[duplex ultrasonography]] is not recommended for routine evaluation of patients with neurological or [[psychiatric disorders]] unrelated to focal [[cerebral ischemia]], such as [[brain tumor]]s, familial or degenerative cerebral or [[motor neuron disorders]], infectious and inflammatory conditions affecting the brain, psychiatric disorders, or [[epilepsy]]. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''3.''' | |bgcolor="LightCoral"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''3.''' Routine serial imaging of the extracranial [[carotid artery|carotid arteries]] is not recommended for patients who have no risk factors for development of [[atherosclerotic]] carotid disease and no disease evident on initial vascular testing. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])'' <nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 64: | Line 75: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' It is reasonable to perform [[duplex ultrasound|duplex ultrasonography]] to detect hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients with [[carotid bruit]]. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki> | |||
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>''' | |bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' It is reasonable to repeat duplex ultrasonography annually by a qualified technologist in a certified laboratory to assess the progression or regression of disease and response to [[therapeutic]] interventions in patients with [[atherosclerosis]] who have had stenosis greater than 50% detected previously. Once stability has been established over an extended period or the patient’s candidacy for further intervention has changed, longer intervals or termination of surveillance may be appropriate. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 78: | Line 86: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki> Duplex ultrasonography to detect hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis may be considered | |bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''1.''' [[Duplex ultrasonography]] to detect [[hemodynamically]] significant carotid stenosis may be considered in asymptomatic patients with symptomatic [[PAD]], [[coronary artery disease]] ([[CAD]]), or [[atherosclerotic]] [[aortic aneurysm]], but because such patients already have an indication for medical therapy to prevent ischemic symptoms, it is unclear whether establishing the additional diagnosis of ECVD in those without [[carotid bruit]] would justify actions that affect clinical outcomes. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' | |bgcolor="LemonChiffon"|<nowiki>"</nowiki>'''2.''' Duplex ultrasonography might be considered to detect carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients without clinical evidence of [[atherosclerosis]] who have 2 or more of the following risk factors: [[hypertension]], [[hyperlipidemia]], tobacco [[smoking]], a family history in a first degree relative of atherosclerosis manifested before age 60 years, or a family history of [[ischemic stroke]]. However, it is unclear whether establishing a diagnosis of ECVD would justify actions that affect clinical outcomes. ''([[ACC AHA guidelines classification scheme#Level of Evidence|Level of Evidence: C]])''<nowiki>"</nowiki> | ||
|} | |} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 107: | Line 99: | ||
[[Category:Cardiology]] | [[Category:Cardiology]] | ||
[[Category:Emergency medicine]] | [[Category:Emergency medicine]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Disease]] | ||
[[Category:Up-To-Date]] | |||
[[Category:Up-To-Date cardiology]] | |||
[[Category:Best pages]] |
Latest revision as of 19:45, 30 January 2013
Carotid artery stenosis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
ACC/AHA Guideline Recommendations |
Periprocedural Management of Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy |
Atherosclerotic Risk Factors in Patients With Vertebral Artery Disease |
Occlusive Disease of the Subclavian and Brachiocephalic Arteries |
Case Studies |
Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound |
FDA on Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound |
CDC on Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound |
Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound in the news |
Blogs on Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Carotid artery stenosis echocardiography or ultrasound |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]
Overview
Carotid stenosis is usually diagnosed by ultrasound scan of the neck arteries. This is the first imaging option and usually used for follow up and observation as it involves no radiation and no contrast agents that may cause allergic reactions.
Echocardiography or Ultrasound
- Carotid duplex ultrasound is the test of choice to evaluate carotid disease.
- Grading:
- Mild - < 40% stenosis
- Moderate - 40 - 69% stenosis
- Severe - 70 - 99% stenosis
Ultrasound Criteria for Carotid Artery Stenosis
- Normal:
- ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/sec and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible sonographically.
- Additional criteria include ICA/CCA PSV ratio < 2.0 and ICA EDV < 40 cm/sec.
- <50% ICA stenosis:
- ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/sec and plaque or intimal thickening is visible sonographically.
- Additional criteria include ICA/CCA PSV ratio < 2.0 and ICA EDV < 40 cm/sec.
- 50%–69% ICA stenosis:
- ICA PSV is 125–230 cm/sec and plaque is visible sonographically.
- Additional criteria include ICA/CCA PSV ratio of 2.0–4.0 and ICA EDV of 40–100 cm/sec.
- >=70% ICA stenosis but less than near occlusion
- ICA PSV is greater than 230 cm/sec and visible plaque and luminal narrowing are seen at gray-scale and color Doppler US (The higher the Doppler parameter lies above the threshold of 230 cm/sec, the greater the likelihood of severe disease).
- Additional criteria include ICA/CCA PSV ratio > 4 and ICA EDV > 100 cm/sec.
- Vear occlusion of the ICA:
- Velocity parameters may not apply, since velocities may be high, low, or undetectable.
- Diagnosis is established primarily by demonstrating a markedly narrowed lumen at color or power Doppler US (35).
- Total occlusion of the ICA
- No detectable patent lumen at gray-scale US and no flow with spectral, power, and color Doppler US. [1]
Examples
{{#ev:youtube|nkCmbY_oLAo}}
2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS: Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease (DO NOT EDIT)[2]
Duplex Ultrasonography to Evaluate Asymptomatic Patients With Known or Suspected Carotid Stenosis (DO NOT EDIT)[2]
Class I |
"1. In asymptomatic patients with known or suspected carotid stenosis, duplex ultrasonography, performed by a qualified technologist in a certified laboratory, is recommended as the initial test to detect hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class III (No Benefit) |
"1. Carotid duplex ultrasonography is not recommended for routine screening of asymptomatic patients who have no clinical manifestations of or risk factors for atherosclerosis. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"2. Carotid duplex ultrasonography is not recommended for routine evaluation of patients with neurological or psychiatric disorders unrelated to focal cerebral ischemia, such as brain tumors, familial or degenerative cerebral or motor neuron disorders, infectious and inflammatory conditions affecting the brain, psychiatric disorders, or epilepsy. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"3. Routine serial imaging of the extracranial carotid arteries is not recommended for patients who have no risk factors for development of atherosclerotic carotid disease and no disease evident on initial vascular testing. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class IIa |
"1. It is reasonable to perform duplex ultrasonography to detect hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients with carotid bruit. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
"2. It is reasonable to repeat duplex ultrasonography annually by a qualified technologist in a certified laboratory to assess the progression or regression of disease and response to therapeutic interventions in patients with atherosclerosis who have had stenosis greater than 50% detected previously. Once stability has been established over an extended period or the patient’s candidacy for further intervention has changed, longer intervals or termination of surveillance may be appropriate. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
Class IIb |
"1. Duplex ultrasonography to detect hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis may be considered in asymptomatic patients with symptomatic PAD, coronary artery disease (CAD), or atherosclerotic aortic aneurysm, but because such patients already have an indication for medical therapy to prevent ischemic symptoms, it is unclear whether establishing the additional diagnosis of ECVD in those without carotid bruit would justify actions that affect clinical outcomes. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
"2. Duplex ultrasonography might be considered to detect carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients without clinical evidence of atherosclerosis who have 2 or more of the following risk factors: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, tobacco smoking, a family history in a first degree relative of atherosclerosis manifested before age 60 years, or a family history of ischemic stroke. However, it is unclear whether establishing a diagnosis of ECVD would justify actions that affect clinical outcomes. (Level of Evidence: C)" |
References
- ↑ Edward G. Grant, Carol B. Benson, Gregory L. Moneta, Andrei V. Alexandrov, J. Dennis Baker, Edward I. Bluth, Barbara A. Carroll, Michael Eliasziw, John Gocke, Barbara S. Hertzberg, Sandra Katanick, Laurence Needleman, John Pellerito, Joseph F. Polak, Kenneth S. Rholl, Douglas L. Wooster, and Eugene Zierler. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis—Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology published online September 18, 2003.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL; et al. (2011). "2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery". Circulation. 124 (4): 489–532. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820d8d78. PMID 21282505.