Vascular access steal syndrome

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiDoc Cardiology News Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Joseph Nasr, M.D.[2]

Synonyms and keywords: Steal syndrome; Access-related hand ischemia; dialysis access steal syndrome; vascular access–induced distal ischemia

Overview

Vascular access steal syndrome, more precisely termed access-related hand ischemia, refers to ischemic symptoms of the hand caused by diversion of arterial blood through a hemodialysis arteriovenous access. It occurs after creation of arteriovenous fistulas or grafts and ranges in severity from mild coolness and paresthesia to rest pain, ulceration, and tissue loss.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Epidemiology

Access-related hand ischemia occurs in approximately 1 percent to 20 percent of patients following arteriovenous access creation, with 1 percent to 9 percent requiring surgical intervention. Incidence varies by access configuration and patient comorbidities.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

Pathophysiology

Three primary mechanisms contribute to access-related hand ischemia:

  1. Arterial occlusive disease proximal or distal to the arteriovenous anastomosis
  2. Increased blood flow through the access, particularly in high-flow fistulas
  3. Failure of distal collateral circulation to adapt to reduced perfusion

These mechanisms may coexist. High-flow states increase the pressure gradient favoring diversion of blood into the access, while underlying atherosclerotic disease limits compensatory distal flow.[1][2][6][7][8]

Symptoms after arteriovenous graft creation tend to occur early due to the fixed large diameter of the graft, whereas symptoms after fistula creation may be delayed as the vein progressively dilates and flow increases.[9]

Risk factors

Risk factors include:

  • Peripheral vascular disease
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Advanced age
  • Female sex
  • Brachial artery–based inflow
  • Multiple prior arteriovenous access procedures
  • History of access-related ischemia

Access configuration and anastomotic size also influence risk. Smaller arteriotomies and avoidance of distal brachial artery inflow when feasible may reduce incidence.[1][2][6][8][10][11]

Clinical features

Symptoms vary in severity and may be intermittent or persistent:

  • Coolness, pallor, paresthesia
  • Pain or claudication during dialysis or exertion
  • Weakness
  • Ischemic rest pain
  • Ulceration or tissue loss

On examination, findings often include diminished or absent distal pulses, delayed capillary refill, and coolness of the hand. Improvement of perfusion findings with manual compression of the access supports the diagnosis.[4][7]

Severity grading

A commonly used clinical grading system includes:

  • Grade 0: Asymptomatic
  • Grade I: Cool extremity with mild symptoms
  • Grade II: Symptoms with dialysis or exertion; claudication
  • Grade III: Ischemic rest pain or tissue loss

Grades II (if lifestyle limiting) and III typically warrant intervention.[5][12]

Differential diagnosis

Conditions that may mimic access-related hand ischemia include:

  • Ischemic monomelic neuropathy – acute onset of severe pain and global neurologic deficits with preserved pulses
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome – median nerve symptoms, worse at night, without ischemic signs
  • Acute limb ischemia – sudden onset with absent pulses and poor perfusion

Careful neurologic examination and hemodynamic assessment are essential for differentiation. [32,33–38][13][14][15][16]

Diagnostic evaluation

Duplex ultrasonography

  • Evaluates arterial stenosis or occlusion
  • May demonstrate retrograde flow from distal artery into the access
  • Measures access flow volume

Retrograde flow can be present in asymptomatic patients and must be interpreted in clinical context.[17]

Access flow measurements

  • High flow generally defined as:
  • 800 mL per minute in autogenous access
  • 1200 mL per minute in nonautogenous access[17][18]

Digital pressures and indices

  • Basal digital pressure <80 mm Hg
  • Digital brachial index <0.6 to 0.7

These findings are associated with ischemia but lack universally accepted thresholds. Improvement with access compression supports diagnosis.[19][20]

Angiography

  • Allows definitive assessment of inflow and outflow lesions
  • Facilitates procedural planning when intervention is indicated

Management

Management depends on symptom severity, access flow, anatomy, comorbidities, and availability of alternative access sites.[12]

Conservative management

  • Appropriate for mild, non–lifestyle-limiting symptoms
  • Close surveillance required

Endovascular treatment

  • Balloon angioplasty with or without stenting for arterial inflow or outflow stenosis[12]

Surgical treatment

Flow reduction techniques

  • Banding or plication to reduce access flow
  • Most effective for high-flow fistulas
  • Overcorrection risks thrombosis; undercorrection may fail to relieve symptoms[21][22][23]

Distal revascularization with interval ligation (DRIL)

  • Bypass from proximal to distal artery with ligation of native artery near access
  • Preserves access while restoring distal perfusion
  • High symptom resolution and durable patency when autogenous conduit is used[24][25][26]

Revision using distal inflow (RUDI)

  • Reconnects access inflow to a smaller distal artery
  • Increases resistance and lowers access flow
  • Comparable outcomes to DRIL in selected patients[27][28][29]

Proximalization of arterial inflow (PAI)

  • Reroutes inflow to a more proximal artery using a conduit
  • Useful when distal arteries are diseased or unsuitable for DRIL or RUDI[23][30]

Distal radial artery ligation

  • Option for radial artery–based forearm access
  • Requires intact palmar arch and adequate ulnar artery perfusion[31]

Access ligation

  • Reserved for refractory ischemia, failed reconstructive procedures, or limited life expectancy[32]

Prognosis

Timely diagnosis and appropriate intervention can relieve ischemic symptoms and preserve access function in most patients. Delay in recognition or treatment, particularly in severe ischemia, increases risk of tissue loss and access abandonment.[24][25][26]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Morsy AH, Kulbaski M, Chen C, Isiklar H, Lumsden AB. Incidence and characteristics of patients with hand ischemia after a hemodialysis access procedure. J Surg Res. 1998;74(1):8-10. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1997.5206
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Lazarides MK, Staramos DN, Panagopoulos GN, Tzilalis VD, Eleftheriou GJ, Dayantas JN. Indications for surgical treatment of angioaccess-induced arterial “steal”. J AmColl Surg. 1998;187(4):422-426. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00139-2
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 HaimovM, Baez A, Neff M, Slifkin R. Complications of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Arch Surg. 1975;110(6):708-712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360120026004
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 Odland MD, Kelly PH, Ney AL, Andersen RC, Bubrick MP. Management of dialysis-associated steal syndrome complicating upper extremity arteriovenous fistulas: use of intraoperative digital photoplethysmography. Surgery. 1991;110(4):664- 669.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Davidson D, Louridas G, Guzman R, et al. Steal syndrome complicating upper extremity hemoaccess procedures: incidence and risk factors. Can J Surg. 2003;46(6):408-412.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Ballard JL, Bunt TJ, Malone JM. Major complications of angioaccess surgery. Am J Surg. 1992;164(3):229-232. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05) 81076-1
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Malik J, Tuka V, Kasalova Z, et al. Understanding the dialysis access steal syndrome. a review of the etiologies, diagnosis, prevention and treatment strategies. J Vasc Access. 2008;9(3):155-166. doi: 10.1177/112972980800900301
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 Valentine RJ, Bouch CW, Scott DJ, et al. Do preoperative finger pressures predict early arterial steal in hemodialysis access patients? a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(2):351-356. doi:10. 1067/mva.2002.125848
  9. ↑ Lazarides MK, Staramos DN, Kopadis G, Maltezos C, Tzilalis VD, Georgiadis GS. Onset of arterial ‘steal’ following proximal angioaccess: immediate and delayed types. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18(11):2387-2390. doi:10.1093/ndt/ gfg346
  10. ↑ Turner MA, Mathlouthi A, Patel RJ, Perreault M, Malas MB, Al-Nouri O. Small arteriovenous anastomosis in fistula creation: establishing a functional vascular access while minimizing steal syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024;99:142-147. doi:10. 1016/j.avsg.2023.10.002
  11. ↑ 11. Kudlaty EA, Kendrick DE, AllemangMT, Kashyap VS,Wong VL. Upper extremity steal syndrome is associated with atherosclerotic burden and access configuration. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;35:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.01.058
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al; National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;75(4)(suppl 2):S1-S164. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2019. 12.001
  13. ↑ Thermann F, Kornhuber M. Ischemic monomelic neuropathy: a rare but important complication after hemodialysis access placement—a review. J Vasc Access. 2011;12(2):113- 119. doi:10.5301/JVA.2011.6365
  14. ↑ Wilbourn AJ, Furlan AJ, HulleyW, Ruschhaupt W. Ischemic monomelic neuropathy. Neurology. 1983;33(4):447-451. doi:10.1212/WNL.33.4.447
  15. ↑ Larson E, Lancaster T, Pelrine E,Werner B, Deal DN. Carpal tunnel release in the dialysis-dependent population: Incidence and outcomes. J Hand Microsurg. 2024;16(3):100056. doi:10.1016/j.jham. 2024.100056
  16. ↑ Nardin R, Chapman KM, Raynor EM. Prevalence of ulnar neuropathy in patients receiving hemodialysis. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(2): 271-275. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.2.271
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Sivanesan S, How TV, Bakran A. Characterizing flow distributions in AV fistulae for haemodialysis access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13(12):3108- 3110. doi:10.1093/ndt/13.12.3108
  18. ↑ van Hoek F, Scheltinga MRM, Luirink M, Raaymakers LCJ, van Pul C, Beerenhout CH. Access flow, venous saturation, and digital pressures in hemodialysis. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(5):968-973. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.064
  19. ↑ Modaghegh MHS, Roudsari B, Hafezi S. Digital pressure and oxygen saturation measurements in the diagnosis of chronic hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62(1):135-142. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.024
  20. ↑ Papasavas PK, Reifsnyder T, Birdas TJ, Caushaj PF, Leers S. Prediction of arteriovenous access steal syndrome utilizing digital pressure measurements. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003;37(3):179-184. doi: 10.1177/153857440303700304
  21. ↑ Soo Hoo AJ, Scully RE, Sharma G, et al. Contemporary outcomes of precision banding for high flow hemodialysis access. J Vasc Access. 2023; 24(6):1260-1267. doi:10.1177/11297298221076581
  22. ↑ Yaghoubian A, de Virgilio C. Plication as primary treatment of steal syndrome in arteriovenous fistulas. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009;23(1): 103-107. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2008.08.009
  23. ↑ 23.0 23.1 Zanow J, Petzold K, Petzold M, Krueger U, Scholz H. Flow reduction in high-flow arteriovenous access using intraoperative flow monitoring. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(6):1273-1278. doi:10.1016/j.jvs. 2006.08.010
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 Kordzadeh A, Parsa AD. A systematic review of distal revascularization and interval ligation for the treatment of vascular access-induced ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(4):1364-1373. doi:10.1016/j. jvs.2019.02.060
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Scali ST, Chang CK, Raghinaru D, et al. Prediction of graft patency and mortality after distal revascularization and interval ligation for hemodialysis access-related hand ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(2):451-458. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012. 08.105
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 Huber TS, Brown MP, Seeger JM, LeeWA. Midterm outcome after the distal revascularization and interval ligation (DRIL) procedure. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(4):926-932. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.05.028
  27. ↑ Misskey J, Yang C, MacDonald S, Baxter K, Hsiang Y. A comparison of revision using distal inflow and distal revascularization-interval ligation for the management of severe access-related hand ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(6):1574-1581. doi:10. 1016/j.jvs.2015.10.100
  28. ↑ Minion DJ, Moore E, Endean E. Revision using distal inflow: a novel approach to dialysis-associated steal syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19(5):625-628. doi:10.1007/s10016-005-5827- 7
  29. ↑ Loh TM, Bennett ME, Peden EK. Revision using distal inflow is a safe and effective treatment for ischemic steal syndrome and pathologic high flow after access creation. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(2):441- 444. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.098
  30. ↑ Bachmann C, Parker M, Sardana T, Ramsey L, Hashemi H. Proximalization of arterial inflow for treatment of hemodialysis access-induced distal ischemia. J Vasc Surg. Published online June, 2024 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.045
  31. ↑ Fitzgibbon JJ, Heindel P, Hentschel DM, Ozaki CK,Hussain MA. Contemporary outcomes of distal radial artery ligation for access related hand ischemia. J Vasc Access. 2025;26(1):149-155. doi:10. 1177/11297298231195910
  32. ↑ Leake AE, Winger DG, Leers SA, Gupta N, Dillavou ED. Management and outcomes of dialysis access-associated steal syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(3):754-760. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.038

Template:WikiDoc Sources

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php?title=Vascular_access_steal_syndrome&oldid=1743158"