Unstable angina / non ST elevation myocardial infarction long-term medical therapy and secondary prevention ACC/AHA guidelines for diabetes mellitus
|
Unstable angina / NSTEMI Microchapters |
|
Differentiating Unstable Angina/Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction from other Disorders |
|
Special Groups |
|
Diagnosis |
|
Laboratory Findings |
|
Treatment |
|
Antitplatelet Therapy |
|
Additional Management Considerations for Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy |
|
Risk Stratification Before Discharge for Patients With an Ischemia-Guided Strategy of NSTE-ACS |
|
Mechanical Reperfusion |
|
Discharge Care |
|
Case Studies |
|
Unstable angina / non ST elevation myocardial infarction long-term medical therapy and secondary prevention ACC/AHA guidelines for diabetes mellitus On the Web |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editors-in-Chief: Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S.; Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan, M.B.B.S.
2012 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline and Replacing the 2011 Focused Update) (DO NOT EDIT)[1]
Diabetes Mellitus (DO NOT EDIT)[1]
| Class I |
| "1. Medical treatment in the acute phase of UA/NSTEMI and decisions on whether to perform stress testing, angiography, and revascularization should be similar in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. (Level of Evidence: A) " |
| Class IIa |
| "1. For patients with UA/NSTEMI and multivessel disease, CABG with use of the internal mammary arteries can be beneficial over PCI in patients being treated for diabetes mellitus. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
| "2. PCI is reasonable for UA/NSTEMI patients with diabetes mellitus with single-vessel disease and inducible ischemia. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
| "3. It is reasonable to use an insulin-based regimen to achieve and maintain glucose levels less than 180 mg/dL while avoiding hypoglycemia* for hospitalized patients with UA/NSTEMI with either a complicated or uncomplicated course. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
* There is uncertainty about the ideal target range for glucose necessary to achieve an optimal risk-benefit ratio.
See Also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 2012 Writing Committee Members. Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, Adams CD, Bridges CR; et al. (2012). "2012 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline and Replacing the 2011 Focused Update): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines". Circulation. 126 (7): 875–910. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318256f1e0. PMID 22800849.