Sepsis electrocardiogram

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Resident
Survival
Guide

Sepsis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information (Adult)

Patient Information (Neonatal)

Overview

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Sepsis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Criteria

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Sepsis electrocardiogram On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Sepsis electrocardiogram

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Sepsis electrocardiogram

CDC on Sepsis electrocardiogram

Sepsis electrocardiogram in the news

Blogs on Sepsis electrocardiogram

Directions to Hospitals Treating Sepsis

Risk calculators and risk factors for Sepsis electrocardiogram

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [2] Jason Le, B.S.[3]

Synonyms and keywords: sepsis syndrome; septic shock; septicemia

Sepsis electrocardiogram

Electrocardiographic abnormalities are common in sepsis but are generally nonspecific and should not be used alone to diagnose sepsis. Findings may reflect systemic inflammation, myocardial injury, autonomic disturbance, metabolic abnormalities, or other acute illness.

Electrocardiographic findings

Common findings include:

  • Sinus tachycardia is frequent in sepsis. In a large emergency department cohort, sinus tachycardia was not independently associated with poor outcome after adjustment for other factors.[1]
  • QRS widening and bundle branch block may occur but are nonspecific and are not diagnostic of sepsis.[1]
  • QT prolongation is common. In a large emergency department sepsis cohort, automated interpretation identified QT prolongation in 54.4% of patients. New-onset QT prolongation occurred in approximately 23% of septic patients and was independently associated with mortality.[1][2]
  • ST-segment elevation may occur and can mimic acute coronary syndrome. In the emergency department cohort, automated interpretation flagged ST elevation in 10.4%, whereas only 1.7% met cardiologist-confirmed acute coronary syndrome criteria.[1]
  • T-wave abnormalities may occur. Abnormal T waves were present in 8.9% of patients in the emergency department cohort and were associated with worse outcomes (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01–1.76).[1]
  • Atrial fibrillation/flutter is common in severe sepsis. Reported incidence is approximately 6%–22% in severe sepsis, with a pooled new-onset atrial fibrillation prevalence of approximately 13% overall (about 7% on general wards to 21% in the ICU). In a cohort of critically ill patients with sepsis, cumulative rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation were approximately 10% with sepsis, 22% with severe sepsis, and 40% with septic shock.[3][4][5]

New-onset atrial fibrillation in sepsis is associated with increased stroke risk (pooled OR approximately 1.17) and recurrent atrial fibrillation. However, routine acute anticoagulation is not favored, and CHA2DS2-VASc performs poorly for stroke prediction in this setting. Anticoagulation decisions should be individualized; detailed management is addressed in the medical therapy microchapter.[4][3]

ST-segment elevation and myocardial injury

ST-segment elevation in sepsis does not necessarily indicate acute coronary occlusion. Critical illness may produce ECG patterns that mimic acute myocardial infarction, and ECG abnormalities should be interpreted together with the clinical presentation and cardiac biomarkers.

In a cohort of critically ill patients with ECG patterns interpreted as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, most patients did not have a corresponding troponin rise, supporting caution in attributing ST-segment elevation to type 1 myocardial infarction.[6]

Elevated troponin levels are common in sepsis and are associated with short-term mortality, but troponin elevation alone does not establish the mechanism of myocardial injury or a diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction.[7]

QT prolongation and Brugada-pattern changes

QT prolongation is a clinically relevant ECG abnormality in sepsis because new-onset QT prolongation has been associated with mortality. ECG interpretation should account for potentially reversible contributors to QT prolongation, including metabolic abnormalities and medications.[2]

Fever can unmask a Brugada ECG pattern. Recognition of a Brugada pattern during febrile illness is important because fever may precipitate ventricular arrhythmias in susceptible patients. Fever should be promptly treated, while specialist evaluation and longer-term management are addressed outside this microchapter.[8]


References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Kotruchin P, Chuehongthong M, Tangpaisarn T, et al. (2026). "Association of Electrocardiogram Abnormalities with Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients". West J Emerg Med. 27 (2): 387–395. doi:10.5811/westjem.50775.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 Liu W, Shao R, Zhang S, et al. (2024). "Characteristics, predictors and outcomes of new-onset QT prolongation in sepsis: a multicenter retrospective study". Crit Care. 28 (1): 115. doi:10.1186/s13054-024-04879-2.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. (2024). "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines". J Am Coll Cardiol. 83 (1): 109–279. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.017.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Cormaci V, Menichelli D, Malatesta D, et al. (2026). "Sepsis, Atrial Fibrillation and Mortality Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of >3 Million Patients". J Infect. 93 (2): 106818. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2026.106818. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  5. ↑ Klein Klouwenberg PM, Frencken JF, Kuipers S, et al. (2017). "Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis. A Cohort Study". Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 195 (2): 205–211. doi:10.1164/rccm.201603-0618OC. PMID 27467907.
  6. ↑ Rennyson SL, Hunt J, Haley MW, Norton HJ, Littmann L (2010). "Electrocardiographic ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Cohort Analysis". Crit Care Med. 38 (12): 2304–2309. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa02cd. PMID 20890196. Vancouver style error: punctuation (help)
  7. ↑ Gajardo A, Ferrière-Steinert S, Valenzuela Jiménez J, et al. (2025). "Early high-sensitivity troponin elevation and short-term mortality in sepsis: a systematic review with meta-analysis". Crit Care. 29 (1): 76. doi:10.1186/s13054-025-05249-2. Vancouver style error: initials (help)
  8. ↑ Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. (2022). "2022 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death". Eur Heart J. 43 (40): 3997–4126. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehac262.