Septic shock
|
WikiDoc Resources for Septic shock |
|
Articles |
|---|
|
Most recent articles on Septic shock Most cited articles on Septic shock |
|
Media |
|
Powerpoint slides on Septic shock |
|
Evidence Based Medicine |
|
Clinical Trials |
|
Ongoing Trials on Septic shock at Clinical Trials.gov Clinical Trials on Septic shock at Google
|
|
Guidelines / Policies / Govt |
|
US National Guidelines Clearinghouse on Septic shock
|
|
Books |
|
News |
|
Commentary |
|
Definitions |
|
Patient Resources / Community |
|
Patient resources on Septic shock Discussion groups on Septic shock Patient Handouts on Septic shock Directions to Hospitals Treating Septic shock Risk calculators and risk factors for Septic shock
|
|
Healthcare Provider Resources |
|
Causes & Risk Factors for Septic shock |
|
Continuing Medical Education (CME) |
|
International |
|
|
|
Business |
|
Experimental / Informatics |
Overview
- Septic shock is the most severe clinical phenotype of Sepsis, characterized by profound circulatory and cellular/metabolic abnormalities associated with a substantially increased risk of death.
- The Sepsis-3 operational definition is vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm Hg or greater and serum lactate concentration greater than 2 mmol/L in the absence of hypovolemia. Septic shock is associated with in-hospital mortality rates greater than 40%. [1]
- Septic shock is the most common form of distributive (vasodilatory) shock and must be distinguished from hypovolemic, cardiogenic, and obstructive shock; detailed differentiation is addressed in the Differentiating septic shock from other diseases microchapter. [2]
- Clinical assessment should integrate hemodynamics, tissue perfusion, lactate concentration, response to initial fluid administration, and the likelihood and source of infection.
Natural History, Complications and Prognosis
- Septic shock requires simultaneous treatment of infection, circulatory failure, and tissue hypoperfusion rather than sequential management of individual abnormalities.
- Persistent vasopressor requirements should prompt reassessment of volume status, ongoing infection, source-control adequacy, cardiac function, and other causes of refractory shock.
- Complications and adverse outcomes are related to persistent circulatory dysfunction, tissue hypoperfusion, ongoing infection, and progressive multiorgan dysfunction.
- Prognosis is poor. Pooled in-hospital mortality is approximately 39% across definitions and rises to approximately 52% when Sepsis-3 criteria are applied; 30-day mortality is approximately 35% and 90-day mortality approximately 38%. [3][4]
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Criteria
- Septic shock is a subset of Sepsis identified within the Sepsis-3 framework by a SOFA score increase of 2 or more points, with both of the following septic shock criteria after adequate volume resuscitation:
- Vasopressor requirement to maintain a MAP of 65 mm Hg or greater.
- Serum lactate concentration greater than 2 mmol/L in the absence of hypovolemia. [1]
- The Sepsis-3 septic shock criteria are operational criteria for clinical and epidemiologic classification and should not delay treatment when septic shock is clinically suspected. [1]
History and Symptoms
- Septic shock should be suspected in any patient with suspected or confirmed infection who develops hypotension requiring vasopressors and/or hyperlactatemia. Presentations are heterogeneous and may be subtle early.
- General features include fever or hypothermia and malaise; site-specific symptoms such as cough, dysuria, and erythema may point to the source; and organ-dysfunction symptoms include confusion, oliguria, and dyspnea.
- Altered mentation, hypotension, and tachypnea are particularly suggestive of sepsis in a patient with infection, although their absence does not exclude it, and signs may be masked by beta-blockers or antipyretics. [5]
Physical Examination
- Physical examination should assess hemodynamics, tissue perfusion, and findings that may identify the source of infection.
- Findings may include hypotension, tachypnea, altered mentation, oliguria, and other manifestations of organ dysfunction.
- General signs may include fever or hypothermia and malaise; source-specific findings may include erythema or other localizing signs.
- Clinical findings may be attenuated or masked by beta-blockers or antipyretics. [5]
- Capillary refill time may be used as a marker of tissue perfusion to guide ongoing fluid and vasopressor titration. [6]
Laboratory Findings
- Serum lactate concentration is a key component of the Sepsis-3 operational definition of septic shock.
- Serum lactate concentration greater than 2 mmol/L, together with vasopressor requirement to maintain a MAP of 65 mm Hg or greater in the absence of hypovolemia after adequate volume resuscitation, fulfills the Sepsis-3 septic shock criteria. [1]
- Characteristic laboratory abnormalities include leukocytosis or leukopenia, more than 10% immature granulocytes (bandemia), hyperglycemia, and elevated creatinine, in addition to elevated lactate. [5]
- Serial lactate assessment and lactate clearance can help guide ongoing resuscitation and assessment of tissue perfusion. [6]
Treatment
Medical Therapy
- The mainstay of therapy for septic shock is simultaneous treatment of infection, circulatory failure, and tissue hypoperfusion.
- Antimicrobial therapy: In possible septic shock, antimicrobial therapy should be initiated immediately. Antimicrobial therapy should subsequently be refined according to microbiologic results and clinical response. [6]
- Antimicrobial de-escalation: Narrowing antimicrobial therapy once a microbiologic diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibilities are available is recommended. [6]
- Source control: An anatomic source of infection that is amenable to intervention should be identified and controlled promptly. [6]
- Fluid resuscitation: Crystalloid solutions are the initial IV fluid of choice, with balanced crystalloids favored over 0.9% saline. SSC 2026 suggests administering at least 30 mL/kg IV crystalloid within the first 3 hours for sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock (conditional recommendation, low certainty), calculated on actual body weight (adjusted or ideal body weight if BMI >30 kg/m²), with frequent reassessment to avoid under- or over-resuscitation. This differs from the ESICM guideline, which suggests up to 30 mL/kg. [6]
- Vasopressor therapy: Norepinephrine is first-line (strong recommendation over dopamine, epinephrine, and selepressin; conditional over vasopressin and angiotensin II). Vasopressin is suggested for escalating norepinephrine doses, with panel practice approximately 0.25–0.5 µg/kg/min, followed by epinephrine if MAP remains inadequate. In septic shock with concomitant cardiac dysfunction, either norepinephrine or epinephrine is suggested first-line. [6]
- Timing of vasopressors: Vasopressors should be initiated promptly when hypotension persists or is severe; in unstable shock, vasopressor therapy may be started concurrently with initial fluid administration, including through a peripheral IV when necessary rather than delaying treatment for central venous access. [6]
- Blood pressure target: An initial MAP target of approximately 65 mm Hg is recommended during vasopressor-supported resuscitation. A lower MAP target of 60–65 mm Hg may be acceptable in older patients with vasodilatory shock. [6][5]
- Perfusion-guided resuscitation: Beyond MAP, serial assessment of tissue perfusion, including lactate clearance and capillary refill time, should inform ongoing fluid and vasopressor titration. [6][5]
- Cardiac dysfunction and persistent hypoperfusion: In septic shock with concomitant cardiac dysfunction, norepinephrine or epinephrine may be used as first-line vasopressor therapy. For persistent hypoperfusion despite adequate intravascular volume and arterial pressure, dobutamine or epinephrine may be considered to provide inotropic support. [6]
- Corticosteroids: SSC 2026 makes a conditional recommendation (low certainty) favoring IV hydrocortisone in septic shock, typically 200 mg/day (divided every 6 hours or by continuous infusion) for ongoing vasopressor requirement. A practical trigger used in the SSC 2021 guideline is norepinephrine or epinephrine ≥0.25 µg/kg/min for ≥4 hours. Corticosteroids reliably increase shock reversal, while the mortality effect is small and uncertain. Addition of fludrocortisone 50 µg daily may confer further benefit, but practice remains variable. [6][7][8]
- Adjunctive catecholamine-sparing therapy: Adjunctive catecholamine-sparing and non-adrenergic vasoactive strategies remain an evolving area of evidence and should not replace established norepinephrine-based first-line management. [9]
Surgery
- An anatomic source of infection that is amenable to procedural intervention should be identified and controlled promptly as part of septic shock management. Detailed source-control procedures are addressed in the Source control microchapter. [6]
Prevention
- Primary prevention of septic shock is addressed through prevention and early treatment of the underlying infectious conditions.
- Once septic shock is recognized, prompt antimicrobial therapy, appropriate fluid and vasopressor resuscitation, source control, and ongoing perfusion assessment are intended to reduce progression of circulatory dysfunction and associated complications.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW; et al. (2016). "The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)". JAMA. 315 (8): 801–810. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
- ↑ Vincent JL, De Backer D. (2013). "Circulatory Shock". The New England Journal of Medicine. 369 (18): 1726–1734. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208943.
- ↑ Vincent JL, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, Cadwell KK. (2019). "Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Critical Care. 23 (1): 196. doi:10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6.
- ↑ Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T; et al. (2020). "Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019—results from a systematic review and meta-analysis". Critical Care. 24 (1): 239. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Meyer NJ, Prescott HC. (2024). "Sepsis and Septic Shock". The New England Journal of Medicine. 391 (22): 2133–2146. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2403213.
- ↑ 6.00 6.01 6.02 6.03 6.04 6.05 6.06 6.07 6.08 6.09 6.10 6.11 6.12 Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W; et al. (2026). "Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026". Critical Care Medicine. 54 (4): 725–812. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000007075.
- ↑ Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W; et al. (2021). "Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021". Critical Care Medicine. 49 (11): e1063–e1143. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
- ↑ Pirracchio R, Annane D, Waschka AK; et al. (2023). "Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Adults with Septic Shock". NEJM Evidence. 2 (6): EVIDoa2300034. doi:10.1056/EVIDoa2300034.
- ↑ Dubech A, Picod A, Pierre A; et al. (2026). "Current and future strategies aiming at reducing catecholamine exposure in septic shock". Critical Care. 30 (1): 427. doi:10.1186/s13054-026-06109-3.