Rocky Mountain spotted fever: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 56: Line 56:
==Treatment==
==Treatment==
[[Rocky Mountain spotted fever medical therapy|Medical therapy]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever surgery|Surgical options]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever primary prevention|Primary prevention]]  | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention|Secondary prevention]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever cost-effectiveness of therapy|Financial costs]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever future or investigational therapies|Future therapies]]
[[Rocky Mountain spotted fever medical therapy|Medical therapy]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever surgery|Surgical options]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever primary prevention|Primary prevention]]  | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever secondary prevention|Secondary prevention]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever cost-effectiveness of therapy|Financial costs]] | [[Rocky Mountain spotted fever future or investigational therapies|Future therapies]]
== Diagnosis ==
A diagnosis of Rocky Mountain spotted fever is based on a combination of clinical signs and symptoms and specialized confirmatory laboratory tests.  Other common laboratory findings suggestive of Rocky Mountain spotted fever include thrombocytopenia, hyponatremia, and elevated liver enzyme levels.
=== Laboratory Findings ===
[[Image:Rick-IFA.jpg|right|thumb|180px|IFA reaction of a positive human serum on Rickettsia rickettsii grown in chicken yolk sacs, 400X]]
Although it is technically feasible, specific rapid laboratory confirmation of early Rocky Mountain spotted fever is rarely done.  Therefore, treatment decisions should be based on epidemiologic and clinical clues, and should never be delayed while waiting for confirmation by laboratory results. Fundamental understanding of the signs, symptoms, and epidemiology of the disease is crucial in guiding requests for tests for Rocky Mountain spotted fever, sample collection and submission, and interpretation of laboratory results.
Routine clinical laboratory findings suggestive of Rocky Mountain spotted fever may include abnormal white blood cell count, thrombocytopenia, hyponatremia, or elevated liver enzyme levels (see Glossary for definitions of terms). Serologic assays are the most widely available and frequently used methods for confirming cases of Rocky Mountain spotted fever. The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (see figure) is generally considered the reference standard in Rocky Mountain spotted fever serology and is the test currently used by CDC and most state public health laboratories, but other well validated assays including ELISA, latex agglutination, and dot immunoassays can be used.
IFA can be used to detect either IgG or IgM antibodies. Blood samples taken early (acute) and late (convalescent) in the disease are the preferred specimens for evaluation. Most patients demonstrate increased IgM titers by the end of the first week of illness. Diagnostic levels of IgG antibody generally do not appear until 7-10 days after the onset of illness.  It is important to consider the amount of time it takes for antibodies to appear when ordering laboratory tests, especially because most patients  visit their physician relatively early in the course of the illness, before diagnostic antibody levels may be present.  The value of testing two sequential serum or plasma samples together to show a rising antibody level is very important in confirming acute infection with rickettsial agents because antibody titers may persist in some individuals for years after the original exposure to any of a number rickettsial agents. IgG antibodies are more specific and reliable since other bacterial infections can also cause elevations in riskettsial IgM antibody titers.
[[Image:Rick-IHC.jpg|right|thumb|180px|Rickettsia rickettsii in endothelial cells of a blood vessel from a patient with fatal RMSF]]
The most rapid and specific diagnostic assays for Rocky Mountain spotted fever rely on molecular methods like PCR which can detect DNA present in 5-10 rickettsiae in a sample. While organisms can be detected in whole blood samples obtained at the acute onset of illness in a few hours, rickettsial DNA is most readily detected in fresh skin biopsies like those used in immunostaining procedures. PCR can also be done on the fixed tissues used in immunostaining, but it is less sensitive than with unfixed tissues. PCR methods can be R. rickettsii-specific but are usually confirmed by DNA sequencing of the amplified gene fragments. Consequently, this procedure is more specific than antibody-based methods which are often only genus or spotted fever group-specific. Specified diagnosis can also be confirmed by isolation of R. rickettsii from clinical samples like whole blood and biopsies. Materials can be shipped unfrozen or frozen and on dry ice to ensure optimal chances of isolation at the CDC. Isolation may require several weeks, but isolates are very important for investigating differences in the pathogenic properties and antimicrobial resistance of rickettsiae which cause disease in different parts of the United States.
Another approach to Rocky Mountain spotted fever diagnostics is immunostaining. This method is used by taking a skin biopsy of the rash from an infected patient prior to therapy or within the first 48 hours after antibiotic therapy has been started.  Because rickettsiae are focally distributed in lesions of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, this test may not always detect the agent.  Even in laboratories with expertise in performing this test, the sensitivity is only about 70% on biopsied tissues because of the scarcity of organisms in some samples.  This assay may also be used to test tissues obtained at autopsy and has been used to confirm Rocky Mountain spotted fever in otherwise unexplained deaths (see figure).  Immunostaining for spotted fever group rickettsiae is offered by the CDC, a few state health departments, and some university-based hospitals and commercial laboratories in the United States.


== Treatment ==
== Treatment ==

Revision as of 19:21, 7 February 2012

For patient information click here.

Rickettsia rickettsii
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Alpha Proteobacteria
Order: Rickettsiales
Family: Rickettsiaceae
Genus: Rickettsia
Species: R. rickettsii
Binomial name
Rickettsia rickettsii
Wolbach, 1919

Template:DiseaseDisorder infobox

Rocky Mountain spotted fever Microchapters

Home

Patient Info

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology & Demographics

Risk Factors

Causes

Differentiating Rocky Mountain spotted fever from other Diseases

Natural History, Complications & Prognosis

Diagnosis

History & Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Chest X-Ray

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Prevention

Case Studies

Case #1

Rocky Mountain spotted fever On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Rocky Mountain spotted fever

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Rocky Mountain spotted fever

CDC on Rocky Mountain spotted fever

Rocky Mountain spotted fever in the news

Blogs on Rocky Mountain spotted fever

Directions to Hospitals Treating Rocky Mountain spotted fever

Risk calculators and risk factors for Rocky Mountain spotted fever

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Please Take Over This Page and Apply to be Editor-In-Chief for this topic: There can be one or more than one Editor-In-Chief. You may also apply to be an Associate Editor-In-Chief of one of the subtopics below. Please mail us [2] to indicate your interest in serving either as an Editor-In-Chief of the entire topic or as an Associate Editor-In-Chief for a subtopic. Please be sure to attach your CV and or biographical sketch.

Overview

Historical Perspective

Pathophysiology

Epidemiology & Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Causes

Differentiating Rocky Mountain spotted fever

Complications & Prognosis

Diagnosis

History and Symptoms | Physical Examination | Laboratory tests | Electrocardiogram | X Rays | CT | MRI Echocardiography or Ultrasound | Other images | Alternative diagnostics

Treatment

Medical therapy | Surgical options | Primary prevention | Secondary prevention | Financial costs | Future therapies

Treatment

Appropriate antibiotic treatment should be initiated immediately when there is a suspicion of Rocky Mountain spotted fever on the basis of clinical and epidemiologic findings. Treatment should not be delayed until laboratory confirmation is obtained.

If the patient is treated within the first 4-5 days of the disease, fever generally subsides within 24-72 hours after treatment with an appropriate antibiotic (usually in the tetracycline class). In fact, failure to respond to a tetracycline antibiotic argues against a diagnosis of RMSF. Severely ill patients may require longer periods before their fever resolves, especially if they have experienced damage to multiple organ systems. Preventive therapy in non-ill patients who have had recent tick bites is not recommended and may, in fact, only delay the onset of disease.


Removal of an embedded tick using fine-tipped tweezers
Tick removal process

What is the best way to remove a tick?

  1. Use fine-tipped tweezers or notched tick extractor, and protect your fingers with a tissue, paper towel, or latex gloves. Persons should avoid removing ticks with bare hands.
  2. Grasp the tick as close to the skin surface as possible and pull upward with steady, even pressure. Do not twist or jerk the tick; this may cause the mouthparts to break off and remain in the skin. (If this happens, remove mouthparts with tweezers. Consult your health care provider if illness occurs.)
  3. After removing the tick, thoroughly disinfect the bite site and wash your hands with soap and water.
  4. Do not squeeze, crush, or puncture the body of the tick because its fluids may contain infectious organisms. Skin accidentally exposed to tick fluids can be disinfected with iodine scrub, rubbing alcohol, or water containing detergents.
  5. Save the tick for identification in case you become ill. This may help your doctor to make an accurate diagnosis. Place the tick in a sealable plastic bag and put it in your freezer. Write the date of the bite on a piece of paper with a pencil and place it in the bag.


Do folklore remedies work?

No. Folklore remedies, such as the use of petroleum jelly or hot matches, do little to encourage a tick to detach from skin. In fact, they may make matters worse by irritating the tick and stimulating it to release additional saliva or regurgitate gut contents, increasing the chances of transmitting the pathogen. These methods of tick removal should be avoided.

Pharmacotherapy

Doxycycline (100 mg every 12 hours for adults or 4 mg/kg body weight per day in two divided doses for children under 45 kg [100 lbs]) is the drug of choice for patients with Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Therapy is continued for at least 3 days after fever subsides and until there is unequivocal evidence of clinical improvement, generally for a minimum total course of 5 to 10 days. Severe or complicated disease may require longer treatment courses. Doxycycline is also the preferred drug for patients with ehrlichiosis, another tick-transmitted infection with signs and symptoms that may resemble Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

Tetracyclines are usually not the preferred drug for use in pregnant women because of risks associated with malformation of teeth and bones in unborn children. Chloramphenicol is an alternative drug that can be used to treat Rocky Mountain spotted fever; however, this drug may be associated with a wide range of side effects and may require careful monitoring of blood levels.

Prevention

Primary Prevention

Tuck pants into socks

Limiting exposure to ticks reduces the likelihood of infection with Rocky Mountain spotted fever. In persons exposed to tick-infested habitats, prompt careful inspection and removal of crawling or attached ticks is an important method of preventing disease. It may take extended attachment time before organisms are transmitted from the tick to the host.

It is unreasonable to assume that a person can completely eliminate activities that may result in tick exposure. Therefore, prevention measures should emphasize personal protection when exposed to natural areas where ticks are present:

  • Wear light-colored clothing which allows you to see ticks that are crawling on your clothing.
  • Tuck your pants legs into your socks so that ticks cannot crawl up the inside of your pants legs.
  • Apply repellents to discourage tick attachment. Repellents containing permethrin can be sprayed on boots and clothing, and will last for several days. Repellents containing DEET (n, n-diethyl-m-toluamide) can be applied to the skin, but will last only a few hours before reapplication is necessary. Use DEET with caution on children. Application of large amounts of DEET on children has been associated with adverse reactions.
  • Conduct a body check upon return from potentially tick-infested areas by searching your entire body for ticks. Use a hand-held or full-length mirror to view all parts of your body. Remove any tick you find on your body.
  • Parents should check their children for ticks, especially in the hair, when returning from potentially tick-infested areas. *Ticks may also be carried into the household on clothing and pets and only attach later, so both should be examined carefully to exclude ticks.

Secondary Prevention

Tick Control

Strategies to reduce populations of vector ticks through area-wide application of acaricides (chemicals that will kill ticks and mites) and control of tick habitats (e.g., leaf litter and brush) have been effective in small-scale trials. New methods being developed include applying acaricides to animal hosts by using baited tubes, boxes, and feeding stations in areas where these pathogens are endemic. Biological control with fungi, parasitic nematodes, and parasitic wasps may play supportive roles in integrated tick control efforts. Community-based, integrated, tick-management strategies may prove to be an effective public health response to reduce the incidence of tick-borne infections. However, limiting exposure to ticks is currently the most effective method of prevention of tick-transmitted diseases.

History

Rocky Mountain spotted fever was first recognized in 1896 in the Snake River Valley of Idaho and was originally called “black measles” because of the characteristic rash. It was a dreaded and frequently fatal disease that affected hundreds of people in this area. By the early 1900s, the recognized geographic distribution of this disease grew to encompass parts of the United States as far north as Washington and Montana and as far south as California, Arizona, and New Mexico.

Howard T. Ricketts was the first to establish the identity of the infectious organism that causes this disease. He and others characterized the basic epidemiological features of the disease, including the role of tick vectors. Their studies found that Rocky Mountain spotted fever is caused by Rickettsia rickettsii. This species is maintained in nature by a complex cycle involving ticks and mammals; humans are considered to be accidental hosts and are not involved in the natural transmission cycle of this pathogen. Tragically—and ironically—Dr. Ricketts died of typhus (another rickettsial disease) in Mexico in 1910, shortly after completing his remarkable studies on Rocky Mountain spotted fever.

References

http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/submenus/sub_rmsf.htm

External links

Template:Wikispecies Template:Wikispecies

Template:SIB Template:Bacterial diseases de:Rocky-Mountains-Fleckfieber eo:Makula febro uk:Висипний тиф Скелястих Гір


Template:WikiDoc Sources