Reperfusion injury natural history: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 36: Line 36:
Prognosis in [[CNS]] patients  
Prognosis in [[CNS]] patients  


* Those [[patients]] who are identified and treated early, the [[prognosis]] is better along with the decreased [[incidence]] of [[Intracranial hemorrhage|intracranial]] hemorrhage. Outcomes usually depend on the timely recognition and prevention of precipitating factors. [[Hypertension]] management is most important before it can inflict damage in the form of [[edema]] or [[hemorrhage]]
* Those [[patients]] who are identified and treated early, the [[prognosis]] is better along with the decreased [[incidence]] of [[Intracranial hemorrhage|intracranial]] [[hemorrhage]]. Outcomes usually depend on the timely recognition and [[prevention]] of precipitating factors. [[Hypertension]] management is most important before it can inflict damage in the form of [[edema]] or [[hemorrhage]]
*The prognosis following [[hemorrhagic]] transformation is poor. [[Mortality]] in such cases is 3663%, and 80% of survivors have significant [[morbidity]].
*The prognosis following [[hemorrhagic]] transformation is poor. [[Mortality]] in such cases is 63%, and 80% of survivors have significant [[morbidity]].
*In case of [[Central nervous system]] the brain is a very sensitive organ to ischemia and results in death with in 5 minutes of onset of ischemia. Reperfusion is usually beneficial if it is conducted with in very short period of time aster the onset of ischemia but i most of the cases reperfusion leads to the development of cerebral ischemia and hemorrhage resulting in the bad prognosis.
*In the case of [[Central nervous system]] the [[brain]] is a very sensitive organ to [[ischemia]] and results in death within 5 minutes of the onset of [[ischemia]]. [[Reperfusion]] is usually beneficial if it is conducted within a very short period of time after the onset of [[ischemia]] but in most cases, [[reperfusion]] leads to the development of [[cerebral ischemia]] and [[hemorrhage]] resulting in a bad [[prognosis]].
*Ischemia reperfusion injury in kidneys is mainly associated with the development of high morbidity and mortality, worse prognosis with the involvement of corticomedullary junction.  
*[[Ischemia]] [[reperfusion]] injury in [[kidneys]] is mainly associated with the development of [[high morbidity]] and [[mortality]], worse prognosis with the involvement of [[corticomedullary junction]].  
*In [[CVS]] patients [[reperfusion]] injury is mainly associated with [[Arrhythmias]], [[myocardial stunning]], and [[myocyte death]], which mainly results in the occurrence of [[Myocardial Infarction]] with a worse [[prognosis]].
*In [[CVS]] patients [[reperfusion]] [[injury]] is mainly associated with [[Arrhythmias]], [[myocardial stunning]], and [[myocyte death]], which mainly results in the occurrence of [[Myocardial Infarction]] with a worse [[prognosis]].


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 22:24, 20 August 2020

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Shivam Singla, M.D.[2] Anjan K. Chakrabarti, M.D. [3] Kashish Goel, M.D.

Overview

Natural History

Reperfusion Injury Natural History

The Ischemia-reperfusion injury was first seen in 1955 by Sewell while performing ligation of Dog's coronary arteries

Then later Jennings gave the term Myocardial IRI in 1960. He is the first person to name the term Ischemia Reperfusion Injury(IRI) on the basis of histological changes in canine myocardium.

Later various terms were given by the scientist depending upon the various organ system involved:

  • Then Modry gave the term Lung IRI in 1978

Ischemic preconditioning was first explained by Murry et al. In 1986 he performed a study in dog explaining the importance of ischemia reperfusion in dogs on infarct size reduction.

Ischemic post-conditioning was given by Zhao et al in 2003 and explained this with the help of an experiment showing a small episode of Ischemia or reperfusion performed immediately after the resumption of flow following a period of ischemia. They found that this helped in the reduction of infarct size in dogs by up to 40%

Natural History of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury

Complications

Complications of IRI

Myocardial stunning: It is mainly defined as an abnormality in the contractile function of myocardium that sometimes persists even after the return of reperfusion and resolution of ischemia. It is mainly due to the release of reactive oxygen species and intracellular calcium overload.

Prognosis

Prognosis in CNS patients

References