Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 55: Line 55:
| Serial [[Deep vein thrombosis ultrasound|lower extremity USG]] or [[Pulmonary embolism other imaging findings#Angiography|Pulmonary angiography]]
| Serial [[Deep vein thrombosis ultrasound|lower extremity USG]] or [[Pulmonary embolism other imaging findings#Angiography|Pulmonary angiography]]
|}
|}


==Low risk outpatient population==
==Low risk outpatient population==

Revision as of 16:45, 19 December 2011

Pulmonary Embolism Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Pulmonary Embolism from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Triggers

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria

Assessment of Clinical Probability and Risk Scores

Pulmonary Embolism Assessment of Probability of Subsequent VTE and Risk Scores

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Arterial Blood Gas Analysis

D-dimer

Biomarkers

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

Ventilation/Perfusion Scan

Echocardiography

Compression Ultrasonography

CT

MRI

Treatment

Treatment approach

Medical Therapy

IVC Filter

Pulmonary Embolectomy

Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy

Discharge Care and Long Term Treatment

Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Follow-Up

Support group

Special Scenario

Pregnancy

Cancer

Trials

Landmark Trials

Case Studies

Case #1

Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach

CDC on Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach

Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach in the news

Blogs on Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach

Directions to Hospitals Treating Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach

Risk calculators and risk factors for Pulmonary embolism diagnostic approach

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editors-in-Chief: Ujjwal Rastogi, MBBS [2]

Overview

Signs and symptoms of pulmonary embolism are nonspecific; therefore, patients presenting with:

—should undergo diagnostic tests until the diagnosis is confirmed or eliminated or an alternative diagnosis is made.

CT equipped hospitals

In hospitals having experience in performing and interpreting CT Pulmonary angiography, following flowchart approach can be adopted.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Determine chances of PE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Low chance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
High chance
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
D-dimer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<500 ng/ml
 
>500 ng/ml
 
 
 
 
 
CT Pulmonary angiography
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PE excluded
 
 
 
 
 
 
Negative
 
 
Positive
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PE excluded
 
 
PE confirmed

CT Non-equipped hospitals

Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) Study proposed the following, for hospitals who do not have sufficient resources to perform or interpret CT Pulmonary angiography.

Wells criteria are used to assess the clinical probability of PE and its graded as Low, Intermediate or High. later a ventilation-perfusion scan (V/Q) is performed, and based on the result of the scan PE is diagnosed.


The following table summarizes the possible outcome of V/Q scan:

V/Q Scan Clinical Probability Diagnosis
Normal any probability PE excluded
Low probability scan Low PE excluded
High probability scan High PE confirmed
Variable result/Non diagnostic Variable Serial lower extremity USG or Pulmonary angiography


Low risk outpatient population

Template:WH Template:WS