Deep vein thrombosis screening: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The sensitivity and specificity of compression [[ultrasound]] (CUS) for proximal DVT are high (97% and 98%, respectively) <ref name="pmid9867760">{{cite journal |author=Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J |title=The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=129 |issue=12 |pages=1044–9 |year=1998 |month=December |pmid=9867760 |doi= |url=}}</ref> and the necessity for treating proximal DVT with anticoagulants is widely accepted <ref name="pmid1406880">{{cite journal |author=Brandjes DP, Heijboer H, Büller HR, de Rijk M, Jagt H, ten Cate JW |title=Acenocoumarol and heparin compared with acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=327 |issue=21 |pages=1485–9 |year=1992 |month=November |pmid=1406880 |doi=10.1056/NEJM199211193272103 |url=}}</ref>. On the other hand, the sensitivity and specificity of CUS for distal DVTs are lower <ref name="pmid9867760">{{cite journal |author=Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J |title=The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=129 |issue=12 |pages=1044–9 |year=1998 |month=December |pmid=9867760 |doi= |url=}}</ref> <ref name="pmid9546569">{{cite journal |author=Anand SS, Wells PS, Hunt D, Brill-Edwards P, Cook D, Ginsberg JS |title=Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? |journal=JAMA |volume=279 |issue=14 |pages=1094–9 |year=1998 |month=April |pmid=9546569 |doi= |url=}}</ref>, and a meta-analysis reported sensitivity of 50% to 75% and specificity of 90% to 95% <ref name="pmid9867760">{{cite journal |author=Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J |title=The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=129 |issue=12 |pages=1044–9 |year=1998 |month=December |pmid=9867760 |doi= |url=}}</ref>. | The sensitivity and specificity of compression [[ultrasound]] (CUS) for proximal DVT are high (97% and 98%, respectively) <ref name="pmid9867760">{{cite journal |author=Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J |title=The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=129 |issue=12 |pages=1044–9 |year=1998 |month=December |pmid=9867760 |doi= |url=}}</ref> and the necessity for treating proximal DVT with anticoagulants is widely accepted <ref name="pmid1406880">{{cite journal |author=Brandjes DP, Heijboer H, Büller HR, de Rijk M, Jagt H, ten Cate JW |title=Acenocoumarol and heparin compared with acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=327 |issue=21 |pages=1485–9 |year=1992 |month=November |pmid=1406880 |doi=10.1056/NEJM199211193272103 |url=}}</ref>. On the other hand, the sensitivity and specificity of CUS for distal DVTs are lower <ref name="pmid9867760">{{cite journal |author=Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J |title=The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=129 |issue=12 |pages=1044–9 |year=1998 |month=December |pmid=9867760 |doi= |url=}}</ref> <ref name="pmid9546569">{{cite journal |author=Anand SS, Wells PS, Hunt D, Brill-Edwards P, Cook D, Ginsberg JS |title=Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis? |journal=JAMA |volume=279 |issue=14 |pages=1094–9 |year=1998 |month=April |pmid=9546569 |doi= |url=}}</ref>, and a meta-analysis reported sensitivity of 50% to 75% and specificity of 90% to 95% <ref name="pmid9867760">{{cite journal |author=Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J |title=The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=129 |issue=12 |pages=1044–9 |year=1998 |month=December |pmid=9867760 |doi= |url=}}</ref>. | ||
Deep-vein thrombosis can be ruled out in a patient who is judged clinically unlikely to have deep-vein thrombosis and who has a negative D-dimer test. Ultrasound testing can be safely omitted in such patients.<ref name="pmid14507948">{{cite journal |author=Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, ''et al.'' |title=Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=349 |issue=13 |pages=1227–35 |year=2003 |month=September |pmid=14507948 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa023153 |url=}}</ref> | |||
Duplex ultrasound screening is typically used for DVT in asymptomatic trauma patients, but practice patterns vary in the United States <ref name="pmid21217477">{{cite journal |author=Haut ER, Schneider EB, Patel A, ''et al.'' |title=Duplex ultrasound screening for deep vein thrombosis in asymptomatic trauma patients: a survey of individual trauma surgeon opinions and current trauma center practices |journal=J Trauma |volume=70 |issue=1 |pages=27–33; discussion 33–4 |year=2011 |month=January |pmid=21217477 |doi=10.1097/TA.0b013e3182077d55 |url=}}</ref>. | Duplex ultrasound screening is typically used for DVT in asymptomatic trauma patients, but practice patterns vary in the United States <ref name="pmid21217477">{{cite journal |author=Haut ER, Schneider EB, Patel A, ''et al.'' |title=Duplex ultrasound screening for deep vein thrombosis in asymptomatic trauma patients: a survey of individual trauma surgeon opinions and current trauma center practices |journal=J Trauma |volume=70 |issue=1 |pages=27–33; discussion 33–4 |year=2011 |month=January |pmid=21217477 |doi=10.1097/TA.0b013e3182077d55 |url=}}</ref>. | ||
Revision as of 22:40, 18 June 2012
Editor(s)-In-Chief: The APEX Trial Investigators, C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2] Ujjwal Rastogi, MBBS [3]; Kashish Goel, M.D.; Assistant Editor(s)-In-Chief: Justine Cadet
|
Deep Vein Thrombosis Microchapters |
|
Diagnosis |
|---|
|
Treatment |
|
Special Scenario |
|
Trials |
|
Case Studies |
|
Deep vein thrombosis screening On the Web |
|
Risk calculators and risk factors for Deep vein thrombosis screening |
Value of screening
In spite of identifying patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), there is no clear clinical value for screening the general population because:
- The strongest risk factor for VTE recurrence is a prior VTE event itself.
- VTE patients with unknown cause have a high rate of recurrence, after discontinuation of warfarin, irrespective of the presence of inherited thrombophilia.
- Anticoagulant prophylaxis is rarely recommended in asymptomatic affected family members, outside of high risk situations.
Screening methods
Ultrasound is a first-line method for screening for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which may be required more than once. While uncommon, other tests may be required if the ultrasound results are unclear, including:
- D-dimer test
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
- Computed tomography (CT).
- Venogram.
The sensitivity and specificity of compression ultrasound (CUS) for proximal DVT are high (97% and 98%, respectively) [1] and the necessity for treating proximal DVT with anticoagulants is widely accepted [2]. On the other hand, the sensitivity and specificity of CUS for distal DVTs are lower [1] [3], and a meta-analysis reported sensitivity of 50% to 75% and specificity of 90% to 95% [1].
Deep-vein thrombosis can be ruled out in a patient who is judged clinically unlikely to have deep-vein thrombosis and who has a negative D-dimer test. Ultrasound testing can be safely omitted in such patients.[4]
Duplex ultrasound screening is typically used for DVT in asymptomatic trauma patients, but practice patterns vary in the United States [5].
Who should be screened?
Screening for inherited thrombophilia in patients who have DVT is discussed here.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Hirsh J (1998). "The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism". Ann. Intern. Med. 129 (12): 1044–9. PMID 9867760. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Brandjes DP, Heijboer H, Büller HR, de Rijk M, Jagt H, ten Cate JW (1992). "Acenocoumarol and heparin compared with acenocoumarol alone in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis". N. Engl. J. Med. 327 (21): 1485–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM199211193272103. PMID 1406880. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Anand SS, Wells PS, Hunt D, Brill-Edwards P, Cook D, Ginsberg JS (1998). "Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis?". JAMA. 279 (14): 1094–9. PMID 9546569. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M; et al. (2003). "Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis". N. Engl. J. Med. 349 (13): 1227–35. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa023153. PMID 14507948. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help) - ↑ Haut ER, Schneider EB, Patel A; et al. (2011). "Duplex ultrasound screening for deep vein thrombosis in asymptomatic trauma patients: a survey of individual trauma surgeon opinions and current trauma center practices". J Trauma. 70 (1): 27–33, discussion 33–4. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182077d55. PMID 21217477. Unknown parameter
|month=ignored (help)