Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


===Biopsy===
===Biopsy===
 
[[Bone marrow biopsy]] is not required in all cases of [[CLL]].  It is used to establish the findings of [[anemia]] and [[thrombocytopenia]].  It can distinguish between thrombocytopenia of peripheral destruction (in the spleen) and that due to marrow infiltration.


===Determining clonality===
===Determining clonality===

Revision as of 05:22, 7 August 2012

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Causes

Differentiating Chronic lymphocytic leukemia from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

Staging

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

Chest X Ray

CT

MRI

Echocardiography or Ultrasound

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies On the Web

Most recent articles

cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies

CDC on Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies in the news

Blogs on Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies

Directions to Hospitals Treating Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Risk calculators and risk factors for Chronic lymphocytic leukemia other diagnostic studies

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Raviteja Guddeti, M.B.B.S. [2]

Overview

Other Diagnostic Tests

Biopsy

Bone marrow biopsy is not required in all cases of CLL. It is used to establish the findings of anemia and thrombocytopenia. It can distinguish between thrombocytopenia of peripheral destruction (in the spleen) and that due to marrow infiltration.

Determining clonality

The diagnosis of CLL is based on the demonstration of an abnormal population of B lymphocytes in the blood, bone marrow, or tissues that display an unusual but characteristic pattern of molecules on the cell surface. This atypical molecular pattern includes the co-expression of cells surface markers cluster of differentiation 5 (CD5) and cluster of differentiation 23 (CD23). In addition, all the CLL cells within one individual are functionally inert and clonal, that is genetically identical. In practice, this is inferred by the detection of only one of the mutually exclusive antibody light chains, kappa or lambda, on the entire population of the abnormal B cells. Normal B lymphocytes consist of a stew of different antibody producing cells resulting in a mixture of both kappa and lambda expressing cells. The lack of the normal distribution of kappa and lambda producing B cells is one basis for demonstrating clonality, the key element for establishing a diagnosis of any B cell malignancy (B cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma).

Flow Cytometry

Clonality is confirmed by the combination of the microscopic examination of the peripheral blood and analysis of the lymphocytes by flow cytometry. The latter is easily accomplished on a small amount of blood. A flow cytometer is an instrument that can examine the marker molecule expression on individual cells in fluids. This is accomplished using antibodies with fluorescent tags recognized by the instrument. In CLL, the lymphocytes are genetically clonal, of the B cell lineage (express marker molecules CD19 and CD20), and characteristically express the marker molecules CD5 and CD23.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

In addition to the maturational state, the prognosis of patients with CLL is dependent on the genetic changes within the neoplastic cell population. These genetic changes can be identified by fluorescent probes to chromosomal parts using a technique referred to as fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Compared with fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), conventional metaphase cytogenetics play ONLY a MINOR prognostic role in CLL, so far, due to technical problems resulting from a limited proliferation of CLL cells in-vitro. Therefore conventional cytogenetics may define subgroups with a high risk of progression. FISH can be done (in CLL) on dividing and non-dividing cells. FISH doesn't tell about IgVH mutations nor does it define the presence of trisomy either. FISH is useful as long as there are CLL cells to test; you can't do it in a complete response (CR).The application of FISH to study interphase nuclei gives important prognostic information with B-cell CLL, especially for patients with 11q-, trisomy 12, 13q- and 17q-. The procedure of FISH involves cell cultures which are prepared after metaphase and prometaphase chromosomes are fixed to a glass slide. A DNA probe is then hybridized onto the chromosome; the probe is labeled with fluorochrome which can be detected with fluorescent microscopy. FISH can be done on dividing and non-dividing cells. Inversions will be missed as probes detect sequences not precise locations. Small mutations, such as small deletions and insertions, will also be missed. FISH is a cytogenetic technology that looks at 200-500 blood cells (obtained with a bone marrow biopsy). Because of the small size it is not as sensitive as PCR. (PCR has extreme sensitivity as well as being quite specific). PCR amplifies a fragment of DNA. It is at least 2-3 logs more sensitive than cytogenetic technology like FISH. PCR measurement requires a sample blood draw which is less invasive and intense than a bone marrow biopsy (with FISH). Four main genetic aberrations are recognized in CLL cells that have a major impact on disease behavior.

  1. Deletions of part of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del 17p13) which target the cell cycle regulating protein p53 (a tumore suppressor gene) are particularly deleterious. Patients with this abnormality have significantly short interval before they require therapy and a shorter survival. This abnormality is found in 5-10% of patients with CLL.
  2. Deletions of the long arm on chromosome 11 (del 11q22-q23) are also unfavorable although not to the degree seen with del 17p. The abnormality targets the ATM gene and occurs infrequently in CLL (5-10%).
  3. Trisomy 12, an additional chromosome 12, is a relatively frequent finding occurring in 20-25% of patients and imparts an intermediate prognosis. It has a higher frequency of DNA aneuploidy.
  4. Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 13 (del 13q14) is the most common abnormality in CLL with roughly 50% of patients with cells containing this defect. These patients (along with those of normal karyotype) have the best prognosis and most will live many years, even decades, without the need for therapy. The gene targeted by this deletion is a segment that likely produces small inhibitory RNA molecules that affect expression of important death inhibiting genes.

The presence of 17p- typifies cells that are resistant to fludarabine, alkylators and rituxumab. 11q- portends a decreased RR to fludrabine as well as an early relapse after bone marrow transplant (BMT). Both the 17p- and the 11q- have a decreased progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Array-based karyotyping

Array-based karyotyping is a cost-effective alternative to FISH for detecting chromosomal abnormalities in CLL. Several clinical validation studies have shown >95% concordance with the standard CLL FISH panel.[1][2][3][4][5]

References

  1. Lehmann S; Ogawa S; Raynaud SD; et al. (2008). "Molecular allelokaryotyping of early-stage, untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia". Cancer. 112 (6): 1296–305. doi:10.1002/cncr.23270. PMID 18246537. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  2. Sargent R; Jones D; Abruzzo LV; et al. (2009). "Customized oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a clinical assay for genomic profiling of chronic lymphocytic leukemia". J Mol Diagn. 11 (1): 25–34. doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080037. PMC 2607562. PMID 19074592. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  3. Schwaenen C; Nessling M; Wessendorf S; et al. (2004). "Automated array-based genomic profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: development of a clinical tool and discovery of recurrent genomic alterations". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (4): 1039–44. doi:10.1073/pnas.0304717101. PMC 327147. PMID 14730057. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  4. Pfeifer D; Pantic M; Skatulla I; et al. (2007). "Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number changes and LOH in CLL using high-density SNP arrays". Blood. 109 (3): 1202–10. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-07-034256. PMID 17053054. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)
  5. Gunn SR; Mohammed MS; Gorre ME; et al. (2008). "Whole-genome scanning by array comparative genomic hybridization as a clinical tool for risk assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia". J Mol Diagn. 10 (5): 442–51. doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2008.080033. PMC 2518739. PMID 18687794. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |author-separator= ignored (help)

Template:Hematology



Template:WikiDoc Sources