Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy

Revision as of 21:08, 22 August 2011 by Varun Kumar (talk | contribs) (/* Complications for endomyocardial biopsy{{cite journal| author=Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U et al.| title=The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Myocarditis Microchapters

Home

Patient Information

Overview

Historical Perspective

Classification

Pathophysiology

Adrenergic Myocarditis
Giant Cell Myocarditis

Causes

Differentiating Myocarditis from other Diseases

Epidemiology and Demographics

Risk Factors

Screening

Natural History, Complications and Prognosis

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Study of Choice

History and Symptoms

Physical Examination

Laboratory Findings

Electrocardiogram

X-ray

Echocardiography and Ultrasound

CT scan

MRI

Other Imaging Findings

Other Diagnostic Studies

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Surgery

Primary Prevention

Secondary Prevention

Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy

Future or Investigational Therapies

Case Studies

Case #1

Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy On the Web

Most recent articles

Most cited articles

Review articles

CME Programs

Powerpoint slides

Google Images

American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy

All Images
X-rays
Echo & Ultrasound
CT Images
MRI

Ongoing Trials at Clinical Trials.gov

US National Guidelines Clearinghouse

NICE Guidance

FDA on Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy

CDC on Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy

Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy in the news

Blogs on Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy

Directions to Hospitals Treating Type page name here

Risk calculators and risk factors for Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [2]; Varun Kumar, M.B.B.S.

Overview

The gold standard is still biopsy of the myocardium, generally done in the setting of angiography. A small tissue sample of the endocardium and myocardium is taken, and investigated by a pathologist and if necessary, immunochemistry and special staining methods may be used. Edematous myocardial interstitium with inflammatory infiltrates, rich in lymphocytes and macrophages may be noted. Focal destruction of myocytes explains the myocardial pump failure.[1]

Endomyocardial biopsy

Heart Failure Society of America recommends that endomyocardial biopsy should be considered when the cardiac function acutely deteriorates with unknown etiology and is unresponsive to medical therapy (Strength of Evidence = B)[2].

Non-specific findings such as hypertrophy, cell loss and fibrosis may be noted on biopsy. However, these biopsy findings significantly affecting patient management has not been established conclusively[3]. For example, inflammatory changes in myocardium may be detected in viral myocarditis. Nevertheless, majority of the patients with biopsy proven myocarditis improve with just supportive care without any need for antiviral or anti-inflammatory treatment[4]. Endomyocardial biopsy has a low sensitivity and specificity which could be explained by the focal and transient nature of the inflammatory infiltrates[5][6].

Myocardial biopsy may be useful in:

  • Confirming the clinically suspected cause of myocarditis.
  • Confirming the presence of cardiac disorders such as amyloidosis which may weigh against the eligibility for transplantation.
  • Giant cell myocarditis can be identified by biopsy. These patients generally progress rapidly to death and are unresponsive to treatment. Hence, myocardial biopsy helps in effective management of these patients by providing circulatory support or immediate heart transplantation[7].

Dallas criteria

Histologically, both active inflammatory cellular infiltrate within the myocardium and associated myocyte necrosis (the Dallas pathologic criteria)[8] may be noted in myocarditis. Dallas criteria despite its considerable limitations, has established uniform histologic criteria and has thus substantially reduced the variations in diagnosing this disease.

  • Active myocarditis: the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate of the myocardium with necrosis and/or degeneration of adjacent myocytes not typical of the ischaemic damage associated with coronary artery disease.
  • Borderline myocarditis: the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate of the myocardium without necrosis or degeneration of adjacent myocytes.

2009 ACC / AHA Guidelines for Endomyocardial Biopsy[9]

Class IIa

  • Endomyocardial biopsy can be useful in patients presenting with heart failure when a specific diagnosis is suspected that would influence therapy.[10] (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III

  • Endomyocardial biopsy should not be performed in the routine evaluation of patients with heart failure.[10] (Level of Evidence: C)

The AHA/ACCF/ESC Scientific Statement: The role of Endomyocardial Biopsy in fourteen clinical scenarios[10]

Class I

1. New-onset heart failure of <2 weeks’ duration associated with a normal-sized or dilated left ventricle and hemodynamic compromise. (Level of Evidence: B)

2. New-onset heart failure of 2 weeks’ to 3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle and new ventricular arrhythmias, second- or third-degree heart block, or failure to respond to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIa

1. Heart failure of >3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle and new ventricular arrhythmias, second- or third-degree heart block, or failure to respond to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: C)

2. Heart failure associated with a DCM of any duration associated with suspected allergic reaction and/or eosinophilia. (Level of Evidence: C)

3. Heart failure associated with suspected anthracycline cardiomyopathy. (Level of Evidence: C)

4. Heart failure associated with unexplained restrictive cardiomyopathy. (Level of Evidence: C)

5. Suspected cardiac tumors. (Level of Evidence: C)

6. Unexplained cardiomyopathy in children. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class IIb

1. New-onset heart failure of 2 weeks’ to 3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle, without new ventricular arrhythmias or second- or third-degree heart block, that responds to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: B)

2. Heart failure of >3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle, without new ventricular arrhythmias or second- or third-degree heart block, that responds to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: C)

3. Heart failure associated with unexplained HCM. (Level of Evidence: C)

4. Suspected ARVD/C. (Level of Evidence: C)

5. Unexplained ventricular arrhythmias. (Level of Evidence: C)

Class III

1. Unexplained atrial fibrillation. (Level of Evidence: C)

Indications for endomyocardial biopsy[11][12]

Complications for endomyocardial biopsy[10][13]

Complications may be as high as 6% as observed in a series where 546 patients with cardiomyopathy underwent right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy[14]. Several other studies reported the incidence of complications ranging between 0.5-1.5%[13][15].

References

  1. Feldman AM, McNamara D (2000). "Myocarditis". N Engl J Med. 343 (19): 1388–98. doi:10.1056/NEJM200011093431908. PMID 11070105.
  2. Heart Failure Society of America. Lindenfeld J, Albert NM, Boehmer JP, Collins SP, Ezekowitz JA; et al. (2010). "HFSA 2010 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline". J Card Fail. 16 (6): e1–194. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.004. PMID 20610207.
  3. Chow LC, Dittrich HC, Shabetai R (1988). "Endomyocardial biopsy in patients with unexplained congestive heart failure". Ann Intern Med. 109 (7): 535–9. PMID 3421562.
  4. Mason JW, O'Connell JB, Herskowitz A, Rose NR, McManus BM, Billingham ME; et al. (1995). "A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis. The Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators". N Engl J Med. 333 (5): 269–75. doi:10.1056/NEJM199508033330501. PMID 7596370.
  5. Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, Meinhardt G, Athanasiadis A, Vogelsberg H; et al. (2004). "Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology". Circulation. 109 (10): 1250–8. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000118493.13323.81. PMID 14993139.
  6. Hauck AJ, Kearney DL, Edwards WD (1989). "Evaluation of postmortem endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 38 patients with lymphocytic myocarditis: implications for role of sampling error". Mayo Clin Proc. 64 (10): 1235–45. PMID 2593714.
  7. Cooper LT, Berry GJ, Shabetai R (1997). "Idiopathic giant-cell myocarditis--natural history and treatment. Multicenter Giant Cell Myocarditis Study Group Investigators". N Engl J Med. 336 (26): 1860–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM199706263362603. PMID 9197214.
  8. Aretz HT, Billingham ME, Edwards WD, Factor SM, Fallon JT, Fenoglio JJ; et al. (1987). "Myocarditis. A histopathologic definition and classification". Am J Cardiovasc Pathol. 1 (1): 3–14. PMID 3455232.
  9. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG; et al. (2009). "2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation". Circulation. 119 (14): e391–479. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192065. PMID 19324966.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, Frustaci A, Jessup M, Kuhl U; et al. (2007). "The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology". Circulation. 116 (19): 2216–33. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.186093. PMID 17959655.
  11. Wu LA, Lapeyre AC, Cooper LT (2001). "Current role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis". Mayo Clin Proc. 76 (10): 1030–8. PMID 11605687.
  12. Magnani JW, Dec GW (2006). "Myocarditis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment". Circulation. 113 (6): 876–90. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584532. PMID 16476862.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Yilmaz A, Kindermann I, Kindermann M, Mahfoud F, Ukena C, Athanasiadis A; et al. (2010). "Comparative evaluation of left and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy: differences in complication rate and diagnostic performance". Circulation. 122 (9): 900–9. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924167. PMID 20713901.
  14. Deckers JW, Hare JM, Baughman KL (1992). "Complications of transvenous right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in adult patients with cardiomyopathy: a seven-year survey of 546 consecutive diagnostic procedures in a tertiary referral center". J Am Coll Cardiol. 19 (1): 43–7. PMID 1729344.
  15. Holzmann M, Nicko A, Kühl U, Noutsias M, Poller W, Hoffmann W; et al. (2008). "Complication rate of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral approach: a retrospective and prospective study analyzing 3048 diagnostic procedures over an 11-year period". Circulation. 118 (17): 1722–8. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743427. PMID 18838566.

Template:WH Template:WS