Preoperative cardiac risk assessment: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 301: Line 301:


'''Inadequate test :'''  In patients undergoing non cardiac surgery ,the inabilty to exercise to a level of 4 - 6 METs without out ischemia should be considered as inadequate test. (Stage II Bruce protocol)
'''Inadequate test :'''  In patients undergoing non cardiac surgery ,the inabilty to exercise to a level of 4 - 6 METs without out ischemia should be considered as inadequate test. (Stage II Bruce protocol)
=== Electrocardiogram - Treadmill Exercise ECG===


==ACC / AHA 2007 Guidelines for Perioperative Cardiac Assessment==
==ACC / AHA 2007 Guidelines for Perioperative Cardiac Assessment==

Revision as of 12:07, 12 October 2012

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor-In-Chief: Mohammed A. Sbeih, M.D. [2]; Kashish Goel,M.D.

Pre-operative cardiac risk assessment Microchapters

Stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment

Estimated energy requirements for various activities

Cardiac risk stratification for noncardiac surgical procedures

ACC / AHA recommendations for perioperative cardiac assessment

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment On the Web

Stepwise approach to preoperative cardiac assessment

Adapted from Fleisher et al. Circulation. 2009 Nov 24;120(21):e169-276[1]; HR, Heart rate

§,∧ Noninvasive testing is not useful for patients with no clinical risk factors undergoing intermediate-risk or low-risk noncardiac surgery (AHA guidelines Class III, Level of Evidence: C).

Clinical risk factors: Ischemic heart disease, compensated or prior heart failure, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and cerebrovascular disease

Original Cardiac Risk Index

Goldman et.al devised a cardiac index for preoperative evaluation in 1977. [2]

Risk Factors Points
History
Age > 70 years 5
Recent MI (6 months) 10
Aortic Stenosis 3
Physical Examination
Signs of Chronic Heart Failure 11
Electrocardiogram
Rhythm other than Sinus Rhythm 7
PVC's > 5/ min 7
Poor General Medical Condition
PO2 < 60mmHg; PCO2 > 50mmHg; K < 3mmol/l; HCO3 < 20mmol/l; urea >18mmol/l (BUN > 50mg/dl); Creatinine > 260umol/l (3mg/dl); bedridden from non-cardiac cause 3
Surgery
Emergency 4
Intrathoracic 3
Total Points 53
Goldman

Classification

Total

Points

1 0 - 5
2 6 - 12
3 13 - 25
4 > 25

Revised Cardiac Risk Index

  • Identification of patients at high rate of complications who are undergoing elective no cardiac surgery.
  • Risk stratification with non invasive techniques.[3]
Revised Cardiac Risk Index
1. History of Ischemic Heart Disease
2. History of Congestive Heart Failure
3. History of Cerebrovascular Disease
4. Insulin Therapy for Diabetes
5. Renal Insufficiency
6. High Risk Type Surgery
  • Rates of major cardiac complications increased with 2 or more risk factors of revised cardiac risk index.[3]

ACC/AHA - Surgery specific risk

  • Vascular surgery has a risk more than 5%
    • Aortic surgeries
    • Peripheral vascular surgery
  • Intermediate risk surgeries are as follows:(1- 5% risk)
    • Intraperitoneal
    • Intrathoracic
    • Carotid endarterectomy
    • Head and neck surgery
    • Orthopedic surgery
    • Prostate surgery
  • Low risk:(< 1%)
    • Endoscopic procedures
    • Superficial procedures
    • Cataract surgery
    • Breast surgery
    • Ambulatory surgery

Cardiac conditions of increased pre-operative risk

1. Unstable coronary syndromes

  • Unstable or severe angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or IV): May include “stable” angina in patients who are unusually sedentary.
  • Recent MI: Greater than 7 days, but less than or equal to 1 month (within 30 days)

2. Decompensated HF

  • NYHA functional class IV
  • Worsening or new-onset heart failure

3. Significant arrhythmias

  • High-grade atrioventricular block
  • Mobitz II atrioventricular block
  • Third-degree atrioventricular heart block
  • Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias
  • Supraventricular arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) with uncontrolled ventricular rate (HR greater than 100 bpm at rest)
  • Symptomatic bradycardia
  • Newly recognized ventricular tachycardia

4. Severe valvular disease

  • Severe aortic stenosis (mean pressure gradient >40 mm Hg, aortic valve area <1.0 cm2, or symptomatic)
  • Symptomatic mitral stenosis (progressive dyspnea on exertion, exertional presyncope, or heart failure)

Estimated energy requirements for various activities#

The metabolic equivalent of task (MET), or simply metabolic equivalent, is a physiological concept expressing the energy cost of physical activities[4] as multiples of resting metabolic rate (RMR) and is defined as the ratio of metabolic rate (and therefore the rate of energy consumption) during a specific physical activity to a reference rate of metabolic rate at rest, set by convention to 3.5 ml O2·kg-1·min-1 or equivalently 1 kcal·kg-1· h-1 or 4.184 kJ·kg-1· h-1. By convention 1 MET is considered as the resting metabolic rate obtained during quiet sitting[5][6] . MET values of physical activities range from 0.9 (sleeping) to 18 (running at 17.5 km/h or a 5:31 mile pace).

Calculating the weekly energy expended in recreational-time physical activity using METs (Metabolic equivalent task) [7].

Physical Activity MET
Light Intensity Activities < 3
Sleeping 0.9
Watching television 1.0
Writing, desk work, typing 1.8
Walking, 1.7 mph (2.7 km/h), level ground, strolling, very slow 2.3
Walking, 2.5 mph (4 km/h) 2.9
Moderate Intensity Activities 3 to 6
Bicycling, stationary, 50 watts, very light effort 3.0
Walking 3.0 mph (4.8 km/h) 3.3
Calisthenics, home exercise, light or moderate effort, general 3.5
Walking 3.4 mph (5.5 km/h) 3.6
Bicycling, <10 mph (16 km/h), leisure, to work or for pleasure 4.0
Bicycling, stationary, 100 watts, light effort 5.5
Vigorous Intensity Activities > 6
Jogging, general 7.0
Calisthenics (e.g. pushups, situps, pullups,jumping jacks), heavy, vigorous effort 8.0
Running jogging, in place 8.0
Rope jumping 10.0

Cardiac risk stratification for noncardiac surgical procedures

High (Reported cardiac risk often greater than 5%)

  • Aortic and other major vascular surgery.
  • Peripheral vascular surgery.
  • Anticipated prolonged surgical procedures associated with large fluid shifts and/or blood loss.

Intermediate (Reported cardiac risk generally 1% to 5%)

  • Carotid endarterectomy.
  • Head and neck surgery.
  • Intraperitoneal and intrathoracic surgery.
  • Orthopedic surgery.
  • Prostate surgery.

Low (Reported cardiac risk generally less than 1%)

  • Endoscopic procedures.
  • Superficial procedure.
  • Cataract surgery.
  • Breast surgery.
  • Ambulatory surgery

ACC / AHA 2007 Recommendations for Preoperative Cardiac Assessment

Risk Factors Functional Capacity Vascular Surgery (High Risk) Intermediate Risk Surgery Low Risk Surgery
0 < 4 Proceed with surgery
Proceed with surgery
Proceed with surgery
0 >= 4 Proceed with surgery
Proceed with surgery
Proceed with surgery
1 or 2 < 4 Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery
1 or 2 >= 4 Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery
>= 3 < 4 Non invasive Stress Test (NST)
Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery
>= 3 >= 4 Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery and Heart rate control
Proceed with surgery

Adapted from lecture of Robert B.McCully,M.D.;

Class I recommendation
Class IIa recommendation
Key points about NST
  • No Class I recommendation
  • Class IIa recommendation in patients with
    • >= 3 risk factors
    • Functional capacity of < 4 METs
    • High risk surgery (Vascular surgery)

Pre-operative stress testing

  • For patients who are able to exercise : Treadmill Exercise ECG.
  • For patients who are unable to exercise : Pharmacological Stress Imaging.

Electrocardiogram - Treadmill Exercise ECG

Risk Assessment
Risk METs Heart rate
High Risk - Ischemia induced by low level of exercise < 4 < 100 or 70% age pred. max
Intermediate Risk - Ischemia induced by moderate exercise 4 - 6 > 100 - 130 or 70 - 85% of age pred. max
Low Risk - No ischemia or ischemia induced at higher level of exercise > 7 > 130 or > 85% of age pred. max

Inadequate test : In patients undergoing non cardiac surgery ,the inabilty to exercise to a level of 4 - 6 METs without out ischemia should be considered as inadequate test. (Stage II Bruce protocol)

Electrocardiogram - Treadmill Exercise ECG

ACC / AHA 2007 Guidelines for Perioperative Cardiac Assessment

This table below contains the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery[8].

Class I

1.Patients who have a need for emergency noncardiac surgery should proceed to the operating room and continue perioperative surveillance and postoperative risk :stratification and risk factor management. (Level of Evidence: C)

2.Patients with active cardiac conditions* should be evaluated and treated per ACC/AHA guidelines and, if appropriate, consider proceeding to the operating room. (Level of Evidence: B)
3.Patients undergoing low risk surgery are recommended to proceed to planned surgery.† (Level of Evidence: B)
4.Patients with poor (less than 4 METs) or unknown functional capacity and no clinical risk factors should proceed with planned surgery.† (Level of Evidence: B)
Class IIa
1.It is probably recommended that patients with functional capacity greater than or equal to 4 METs without symptoms‡ proceed to planned surgery.§ (Level of Evidence: B)
2.It is probably recommended that patients with poor (less than 4 METs) or unknown functional capacity and 3 or more clinical risk factors who are scheduled for vascular surgery consider testing if it will change management.¶ (Level of Evidence: B)
3.It is probably recommended that patients with poor (less than 4 METs) or unknown functional capacity and 3 or more clinical risk factors who are scheduled for intermediate risk surgery proceed with planned surgery with heart rate control.¶ (Level of Evidence: B)
4.It is probably recommended that patients with poor (less than 4 METs) or unknown functional capacity and 1 or 2 clinical risk factors who are scheduled for vascular or intermediate risk surgery proceed with planned surgery with heart rate control.¶ (Level of Evidence: B)
Class IIa
1.Noninvasive testing might be considered if it will change management for patients with poor (less than 4 METs) or unknown functional capacity and 3 or more clinical risk factors who are scheduled for intermediate risk surgery. (Level of Evidence: B)
2.Noninvasive testing might be considered if it will change management for patients with poor (less than 4 METs) or unknown functional capacity and 1 or 2 clinical risk factors who are scheduled for vascular or intermediate risk surgery. (Level of Evidence: B)

§Noninvasive testing may be considered before surgery in specific patients with risk factors if it will change management. Clinical risk factors include ischemic heart disease, compensated or prior heart failure, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, and cerebrovascular disease. ¶Consider perioperative beta blockade for populations in which this has been shown to reduce cardiac morbidity/mortality.

References

  1. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA; et al. (2009). "2009 ACCF/AHA focused update on perioperative beta blockade incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines". Circulation. 120 (21): e169–276. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192690. PMID 19884473. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, Burke DS, O'Malley TA, Goroll AH, Caplan CH, Nolan J, Carabello B, Slater EE (1977). "Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures". The New England Journal of Medicine. 297 (16): 845–50. doi:10.1056/NEJM197710202971601. PMID 904659. Retrieved 2012-10-11. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L (1999). "Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery". Circulation. 100 (10): 1043–9. PMID 10477528. Retrieved 2012-10-11. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Physical activity can be defined as “bodily movement produced by the contraction of skeletal muscle that increases energy expenditure above the basal level”
  5. Ainsworth et al., 1993
  6. Ainsworth et al., 2000.
  7. Adapted from Compendium of Physical Activities. Ainsworth, BE et al. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. Vol 25, Pg 713 (1993) and Vol 32, S498 (2000).
  8. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE; et al. (2007). "ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery". Circulation. 116 (17): e418–99. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185699. PMID 17901357.


Template:WikiDoc Sources